Climate Dynamics

, Volume 22, Issue 6–7, pp 597–603 | Cite as

Direct human influence of irrigation on atmospheric water vapour and climate

  • O. BoucherEmail author
  • G. Myhre
  • A. Myhre


Human activity increases the atmospheric water vapour content in an indirect way through climate feedbacks. We conclude here that human activity also has a direct influence on the water vapour concentration through irrigation. In idealised simulations we estimate a global mean radiative forcing in the range of 0.03 to +0.1 Wm–2 due to the increase in water vapour from irrigation. However, because the water cycle is embodied in the climate system, irrigation has a more complex influence on climate. We also simulate a change in the temperature vertical profile and a large surface cooling of up to 0.8 K over irrigated land areas. This is of opposite sign than expected from the radiative forcing alone, and this questions the applicability of the radiative forcing concept for such a climatic perturbation. Further, this study shows stronger links than previously recognised between climate change and freshwater scarcity which are environmental issues of paramount importance for the twenty first century.


Water Vapour Land Surface Temperature Radiative Force Precipitable Water Evaporative Cool 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank P. Döll for providing the data of irrigated areas and the LMD for supporting the LMDZT model. Computing time was provided by the “Institut du Développement et des Ressources en Informatique Scientifique” of the CNRS under project 021167. The Laboratoire d’Optique Atmosphérique is an institute of the “Fédération de Recherche” FR1818 of the CNRS. Dr. Chris Milly and an anonymous reviewer are acknowledged for their helpful comments.


  1. Ackerman AS, Toon OB, Stevens DE, Heymsfield AJ, Ramanathan V, Welton EJ (2000) Reduction of tropical cloudiness by soot. Science 288: 1042–1047CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adegoke JO, Pielke RA Sr, Eastman J, Mahmood R, Hubbard KG (2003) Impact of irrigation on midsummer surface fluxes and temperature under dry synoptic conditions: a regional atmospheric model study of the U.S. high plains. Mon Weather Rev 131: 556–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen MR, Ingram WJ (2002) Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrological cycle. Nature 419: 224–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnston AG, Schickedanz PT (1984) The effect of irrigation on warm season precipitation in the southern Great Plains. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23: 865–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boucher O, Pham M (2002) History of sulfate aerosol radiative forcings. Geophys Res Lett 29(9): 1308, doi:10.1029/2001GL014048Google Scholar
  6. Boucher O, Pham M, Venkataraman C (2002) Simulation of the atmospheric sulfur cycle in the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique General Circulation Model. Model description, model evaluation, and global and European budgets. Note Technique de l’IPSL 23. Available from Scholar
  7. Döll P (2002) Impact of climate change and variability on irrigation requirements: a global perspective. Clim Change 54: 269–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Döll P, Siebert S (2000) A digital global map of irrigated areas. ICID J 49: 55–66Google Scholar
  9. Döll P, Siebert S (2002) Global modeling of irrigation water requirements. Water Resources Res 38: 1037Google Scholar
  10. Gaffen DJ, Ross RJ (1999) Climatology and trends of US surface humidity and temperature. J Clim 12: 811–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R (1997) Radiative forcing and climate response. J Geophys Res 102: 6831–6864Google Scholar
  12. Hourdin F, Armangaud A (1999) The use of finite-volume methods for atmospheric advection of trace species. Part I. Test of various formulations in a general circulation model. Mon Weather Rev 127: 822–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1999) Aviation and the global atmosphere. In: JE Penner et al. (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp 373Google Scholar
  14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) The Scientific Basis. In: JT Houghton et al. (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA, pp 881Google Scholar
  15. Jianping Z, Zhong Y, Daojie W, Xinbao Z (2002) Climate change and causes in the Yuanmou dry-hot valley of Yunnan China. J Arid Environ 51: 153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaufman YJ, Tanré D, Boucher O (2002) A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system. Nature 419: 215–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiehl JT, Trenberth KE (1997) Earth’s annual global mean energy budget. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78: 197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kite G, Droogers P (2000) Comparing estimates of actual evapotranspiration from satellites, hydrological models, and field data: a case study from western Turkey. International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Research Report 42, pp 32Google Scholar
  19. Le Treut H, Forichon M, Boucher O, Li Z-X (1998) Sulfate aerosol indirect effect and CO2 greenhouse forcing: equilibrium response of the LMD GCM and associated cloud feedbacks. J Clim 11: 1673–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lohar D, Pal B (1995) The effect of irrigation on premonsoon season precipitation over south west Bengal, India. J Clim 8: 2567–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Milly PCD, Dunne KA (1994) Sensitivity of the global water cycle to the water-holding capacity of land. J Clim 7: 506–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Molden D (1997) Accounting for water use and productivity. System – wide initiative for water management (SWIM) SWIM Paper 1, pp 16Google Scholar
  23. Moore N, Rojstaczer S (2001) Irrigation-induced rainfall and the Great Plains. J Appl Meteorol 40: 1297–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myhre G, Stordal F (1997) Role of spatial and temporal variations in the computation of radiative forcing and GWP. J Geophys Res 102: 11,181–11,200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pielke RA Sr, Marland G, Betts RA, Chase TN, Eastman JL, Niles JO, Niyogi DDS, Running SW (2002) The influence of land-use change and landscape dynamics on the climate system: relevance to climate-change policy beyond the radiative effect of greenhouse gases. Philos Trans R Soc London A 360: 1705–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Postel S (1999) Pillar of sand. A worldwatch book. W.W. Norton and Company, pp 263Google Scholar
  27. de Ridder K, Gallée H (1998) Land surface-induced regional climate change in southern Israel. J Appl Meteorol 37: 1470–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rotstayn LD, Penner JE (2001) Indirect aerosol forcing, quasi-forcing, and climate response. J Clim 14: 2960–2975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seckler D, Amarasinghe U, Molden D, de Silva R, Barker R (1998) World water demand and supply, 1990 to 2025: scenarios and issues. International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Research report 19, pp 40Google Scholar
  30. Segal M, Pan Z, Turner RW, Takle ES (1998) On the potential impact of irrigated areas in North America on summer rainfall caused by large-scale systems. J Appl Meteorol 37: 325–331Google Scholar
  31. Shiklomanov IA, Markova OL (1987) Problems of water supply and transfers of river flow in the world. Gidrometeoizdat, pp 294 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  32. Soden BJ, Wetherald RT, Stenchikov GL, Robock A (2002) Global cooling after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo: a test of climate feedback by water vapor. Science 296: 727–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. de Vries DA (1959) The influence of irrigation on the energy balance and the climate near the ground. J Meteorol 16: 256–270Google Scholar
  34. Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parametrization in large-scale models. Mon Weather Rev 117: 1779–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van Leer B (1977) Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. Part IV. A new approach to numerical convection. J Comput Phys 23: 276–299Google Scholar
  36. Zhou T-J, Li Z-X (2002) Simulation of the east Asian summer monsoon using a variable resolution atmospheric GCM. Clim Dyn 19: 167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag  2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Optique AtmosphériqueCNRS/USTLVilleneuve d’Ascq CedexFrance
  2. 2.Department of Geosciences University of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.Telemark University CollegeNorway

Personalised recommendations