Climate Dynamics

, Volume 22, Issue 6–7, pp 701–720 | Cite as

Simulated variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation

Article

Abstract

To examine the multi-annual to decadal scale variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) we conducted a four-member ensemble with a daily reanalysis forced, medium-resolution global version of the isopycnic coordinate ocean model MICOM, and a 300-years integration with the fully coupled Bergen Climate Model (BCM). The simulations of the AMOC with both model systems yield a long-term mean value of 18 Sv and decadal variability with an amplitude of 1–3 Sv. The power spectrum of the inter-annual to decadal scale variability of the AMOC in BCM generally follows the theoretical red noise spectrum, with indications of increased power near the 20-years period. Comparison with observational proxy indices for the AMOC, e.g. the thickness of the Labrador Sea Water, the strength of the baroclinic gyre circulation in the North Atlantic Ocean, and the surface temperature anomalies along the mean path of the Gulf Stream, shows similar trends and phasing of the variability, indicating that the simulated AMOC variability is robust and real. Mixing indices have been constructed for the Labrador, the Irminger and the Greenland-Iceland-Norwegian (GIN) seas. While convective mixing in the Labrador and the GIN seas are in opposite phase, and linked to the NAO as observations suggest, the convective mixing in the Irminger Sea is in phase with or leads the Labrador Sea. Newly formed deep water is seen as a slow, anomalous cold and fresh, plume flowing southward along the western continental slope of the Atlantic Ocean, with a return flow of warm and saline water on the surface. In addition, fast-travelling topographically trapped waves propagate southward along the continental slope towards equator, where they go east and continue along the eastern rim of the Atlantic. For both types of experiments, the Northern Hemisphere sea level pressure and 2 m temperature anomaly patterns computed based on the difference between climate states with strong and weak AMOC yields a NAO-like pattern with intensified Icelandic low and Azores high, and a warming of 0.25–0.5 °C of the central North Atlantic sea-surface temperature (SST). The reanalysis forced simulations indicate a coupling between the Labrador Sea Water production rate and an equatorial Atlantic SST index in accordance with observations. This coupling is not identified in the coupled simulation.

References

  1. Alley RB (1998) Paleoclimatology: Icing the North Atlantic. Nature 392: 335–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arakawa A, Lamb VR (1977) Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model. In: Chang J (ed) Methods in computational physics. Academic Press, New York vol. 17, pp 173–265Google Scholar
  3. Bentsen M, Drange H (2000) Parametrizing surface fluxes in ocean models using the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data. In: RegClim General Technical Report 4, pp 149–158. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentsen M, Evensen G, Drange H, Jenkins AD (1999) Coordinate transformation on a sphere using conformal mapping. Mon Weather Rev 127: 2733–2740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjerknes J (1964) Atlantic air-sea interaction. Advances in geophysics. Academic Press, New York vol 10, pp 1–83Google Scholar
  6. Bleck R, Rooth C, Hu D, Smith LT (1992) Salinity-driven thermocline transients in a wind- and thermohaline-forced isopycnic coordinate model of the North Atlantic. J Phys Oceanogr 22: 1486–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond G, Broecker W, Johnsen S, McManus J, Labeyrie L, Jouzel J, Bonani G (1993) Correlations between climate records from North Atlantic sediments and Greenland ice. Nature 365: 143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bower A, Hunt H (2000) Lagrangian observations of deep western boundary current in the North Atlantic Ocean. Part I: Large-scale pathways and spreading rates. J Phys Oceanogr 30: 764–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broecker WS (1997) Thermodynamic circulation, the achilles heel of our climate system: will man-made CO2 upset the current balance? Science 278: 1582–1588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark PU, Pisias NG, Stocker TF, Weaver AJ (2002) The role of the thermohaline circulation in abrupt climate change. Nature 415: 863–869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Covey C, AchutaRao KM, Cubasch U, Jones P, Lambert SJ, Mann ME, Phillips TJ, Taylor KE (2003) An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. Glob Planet Change 37: 103–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cubasch U, Meehl GA, Boer GJ, Stouffer RJ, Dix M, Noda A, Senior CA, Raper S, Yap KS (2001) Projections of future climate change. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Nogua M, Griggs D, Linden PV, Maskell K (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK pp 525–582Google Scholar
  13. Curry RG, McCartney MS (2001) Ocean gyre circulation changes associated with the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Phys Oceanogr 31: 3374–3400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curry RG, McCartney MS, Joyce TM (1998) Oceanic transport of subpolar climate signals to mid-depth subtropical waters. Nature 391: 575–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delworth TL, Greatbatch RJ (2000) Multidecadal thermohaline circulation variability driven by atmospheric surface flux forcing. J Clim 13: 1481–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delworth TL, Manabe S, Stouffer RJ (1993) Interdecadal variations of the thermohaline circulation in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. J Clim 6: 1993–2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Déqué M, Dreveton C, Braun A, Cariolle D (1994) The ARPEGE/IFS atmosphere model: a contribution to the French community climate modelling. Clim Dyn 10: 249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dickson B, Yashayaev I, Meincke J, Turrell B, Dye S, Holfort J (2002) Rapid freshening of the deep North Atlantic Ocean over the past four decades. Nature 416: 832–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dickson RR, Brown J (1994) The production of North Atlantic Deep Water: sources, rates, and pathways. J Geophys Res 99: 12,319–12,341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dickson RR, Lazier J, Meincke J, Rhines P, Swift J (1996) Long-term coordinated changes in the convective activity of the North Atlantic. Prog Oceanogr 38: 241–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dixon KW, Delworth TL, Spelman MJ, Stouffer R (1999) The influence of transient surface fluxes on North Atlantic overturning in a coupled GCM climate change experiment. Geophys Res Lett 26: 2749–2752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dong BW, Sutton RT (2001) The dominant mechanisms of variability in Atlantic ocean heat transport in a coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM. Geophys Res Lett 28: 2445–2448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drange H, Simonsen K (1996) Formulation of air-sea fluxes in the ESOP2 version of MICOM. Technical Report 125, Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Norway, Bergen, pp 23Google Scholar
  24. Eden C, Jung T (2001) North Atlantic interdecadal variability: oceanic response to the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Clim 14: 676–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fichefet T, Gaspar P (1988) A model study of upper ocean-sea ice interaction. J Phys Oceanogr 18: 181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frankignoul C, de Coëtlogon G, Joyce TM, Dong S (2001) Gulf Stream variability and ocean–atmosphere interactions. J Phys Oceanogr 31: 3516–3529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Friedrich H, Levitus S (1972) An approximation to the equation of state for sea water, suitable for numerical ocean models. J Phys Oceanogr 2: 514–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Furevik T, Bentsen M, Drange H, Kindem IKT, Kvamstø NG, Sorteberg A (2003) Description and evaluation of the Bergen climate model: ARPEGE coupled with MICOM. Clim Dyn 21: 27–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gargett AE (1984) Vertical eddy diffusivity in the ocean interior. J Mar Res 42: 359–393Google Scholar
  30. Gaspar P (1998) Modeling the seasonal cycle of the upper ocean. J Phys Oceangr 18:161–180Google Scholar
  31. Gent PR (2001) Will the North Atlantic Ocean thermohaline circulation weaken during the 21st century? Geophys Res Lett 28: 1023–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gloersen P, Campbell WJ, Cavalieri DJ, Comiso JC, Parkinson CL, Zwally HJ (1992) Arctic and Antarctic sea ice, 1978–1987. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. NASA SP-551, pp 290Google Scholar
  33. Griffies SM, Tziperman E (1995) A linear thermohaline oscillator driven by stochastic atmospheric forcing. J Clim 8: 2440–2453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hall MM, Bryden HL (1982) Direct estimates and mechanisms of ocean heat transport. Deep-Sea Res 29: 339–359Google Scholar
  35. Hansen B, Turrell WR, Østerhus S (2001) Decreasing overflow from the Nordic seas into the Atlantic Ocean through the Faroe Bank channel since 1950. Nature 411: 927–930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Harder M (1996) Dynamik, Rauhigkeit und Alter des Meereises in der Arktis. PhD Thesis Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany, pp 124Google Scholar
  37. Hibler III WD (1979) A dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model. J Phys Oceanogr 9: 815–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hurrell JW (1995) Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269: 676–679Google Scholar
  39. Jayne S, Marotzke J (2001) The dynamics of ocean heat transport variability. Rev Geophys 39: 385–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson HL, Marshall DP (2002) A theory for the surface atlantic response to thermohaline variability. J Phys Oceanogr 32: 1121–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Joyce TM, Deser C, Spall MA (2000) The relation between decadal variability of subtropical mode water and the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Clim 13: 2550–2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kalnay E et al. (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77: 437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kawase M (1987) Establishment of deep ocean circulation driven by deep-water production. J Phys Oceanogr 17: 2294–2317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Latif M, Roeckner E, Mikolajewicz U, Voss R (2000) Tropical stabilisation of the thermohaline circulation in a greenhouse warming simulation. J Clim 13: 1809–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lavin A, Bryden HL, Parrilla G (1998) Meridional transport and heat flux variations in the subtropical North Atlantic. Glob Atmos Ocean Sys 6: 269–293Google Scholar
  46. Levitus S, Boyer TP (1994) World Ocean Atlas 1994 vol 4: temperature. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 4, US Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C, USA pp 117Google Scholar
  47. Levitus S, Burgett R, Boyer TP (1994) World Ocean Atlas 1994 vol 3: salinity. NOAA Atlas NESDIS 3, US Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. USA pp 99Google Scholar
  48. Mann ME, Park J (1994) Global-scale modes of surface temperature variability on interannual to century time scales. J Geophys Res 99: 25,819–25,833Google Scholar
  49. Marshall J, Kushnir Y, Battisti D, Chang P, Czaja A, Dickson R, Hurrell J, McCartney M, Saravanan R, Visbeck M (2001) North Atlantic climate variability: phenomena, impacts and mechanisms. Int J Clim 21: 1863–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mauritzen C, Häkkinen S (1999) On the relationship between dense water formation and the “meridional overturning cell” in the North Atlantic Ocean. Deep-Sea Res 46: 877–894Google Scholar
  51. McDougall TJ, Dewar WK (1998) Vertical mixing and cabbeling in layered models. J Phys Oceanogr 28: 1458–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mikolajewizc U, Voss R (2000) The role of the individual air-sea flux components in CO2-induced changes of the ocean circulation and climate. Clim Dyn 16: 627–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Neill BC, Oppenheimer M (2002) Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto Protocol. Science 296: 1971–1972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Otterå OH, Drange H, Bentsen M, Kvamstø NG, Jiang D (2003) The sensitivity of the present-day Atlantic meridional overturning circulation to freshwater forcing. Geophys Res Lett 30: doi:10.1029/2003GL017578Google Scholar
  55. Otterå OH, Drange H, Bentsen M, Kvamstø NG, Jiang D (2004) Transient response of enhanced freshwater to the Nordic Seas-Arctic Ocean in the Bergen Climate Model. Tellus. (in press)Google Scholar
  56. Parkinson CL, Washington WM (1979) A large-scale numerical model of sea ice. J Geophys Res 84: 311–337Google Scholar
  57. Pickart RS, Lavender K (2000) Is Labrador Sea Water formed in the Irminger Basin? WOCE Newsle 39: 6–8Google Scholar
  58. Pickart RS, Straneo F, Moore GWK (2003) Is Labrador Sea Water formed in the Irminger basin? Deep-Sea Res 50: 23–52Google Scholar
  59. Rahmstorf S, Ganopolski A (1999) Long-term global warming scenarios computed with an efficient coupled climate model. Clim Change 43: 353–367Google Scholar
  60. Rossby T, Benway RL (2000) Slow variations in mean path of the Gulf Stream east of Cape Hatteras. Geophys Res Lett 27: 117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schmittner A, Weaver AJ (2001) Dependence of multiple climate states on ocean mixing parameters. Geophys Res Lett 28: 1027–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Semtner Jr AJ (1976) A model for the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in numerical investigations of climate. J Phys Oceanogr 6: 379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smolarkiewicz PK (1984) A fully multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm with small implicit diffusion. J Comput Phys 54: 325–362Google Scholar
  64. Smolarkiewicz PK, Clark TL (1986) The multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm: further development and applications. J Comp Phys 67: 396–438Google Scholar
  65. Stocker TF, Schmittner A (1997) Influence of CO2 emission rates on the stability of the thermohaline circulation. Nature 388: 862–865Google Scholar
  66. Sun S, Bleck R (2001) Thermohaline circulation studies with an isopycnic coordinate ocean model. J Phys Oceanogr 31: 2761–2782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taylor AH, Stephens JA (1980) Latitudinal displacements of the Gulf Stream (1966 to 1977) and their relation to changes in temperature and zooplankton abundance in the NE Atlantic. Oceanol Acta 3: 145–149Google Scholar
  68. Terray L, Thual O (1995) Oasis: le couplage océan–atmosphère. La Météorologie 10: 50–61Google Scholar
  69. Terray L, Thual O, Belamari S, Déqué M, Dandin P, Lévy C, Delecluse P (1995) Climatology and interannual variability simulated by the arpege–opa model. Clim Dyn 11: 487–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Timmermann A, Latif M, Voss R, Grötzner A (1998) Northern Hemispheric interdecadal variability: a coupled air-sea mode. J Clim 11: 1906–1931Google Scholar
  71. Trenberth KE, Caron JM (2001) Estimates of meridional atmosphere and ocean heat transports. J Clim 14: 3433–3443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. von Storch JS, Müller P, Stouffer RJ, Voss R, Tett SFB (2000) Variability of deep-ocean mass transport: spectral shapes and spatial scales. J Clim 13: 1916–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weaver AJ, Sarachik ES (1991) Evidence for decadal variability in an ocean general circulation model: an advective mechanism. Atmos-Ocean 29: 197–231Google Scholar
  74. Weaver AJ, Sarachik ES, Marotzke J (1991) Freshwater flux forcing and interdecadal ocean variability. Nature 353: 836–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weaver AJ, Valcke S (1998) On the variability of the thermohaline circulation in the GFDL coupled model. J Clim 11: 759–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weaver AJ, Marotzke J, Cummins PF, Sarachik ES (1993) Stability and variability of the thermohaline circulation. J Phys Oceanogr 23: 39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weisse R, Mikolajewicz U, Maier-Reimer E (1994) Decadal variability of the North Atlantic in an ocean general circulation model. J Geophys Res 99: 12,411–12,421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wood RA, Keen AB, Mitchell JFB, Gregory JM (1999) Changing spatial structure of the thermohaline circulation in response to atmospheric CO2 forcing in a climate model. Nature 399: 572–575Google Scholar
  79. Wu P, Wood R, Stott P (2004) Does the recent freshening trend in the North Atlantic indicate a weakening thermohaline circulation? Geophys Res Lett 31:doi:10.1029/2003GL018584Google Scholar
  80. Yang J (1999) A linkage between decadal climate variations in the Labrador Sea and the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Geophys Res Lett 26: 1023–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zalesak ST (1979) Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for fluids. J Comp Phys 31: 335–362Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag  2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Bentsen
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. Drange
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • T. Furevik
    • 3
    • 2
  • T. Zhou
    • 5
  1. 1.Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing CenterBergenNorway
  2. 2.Bjerknes Centre for Climate ResearchBergenNorway
  3. 3.Geophysical InstituteUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  4. 4.Nansen-Zhu International Research CentreBeijingChina
  5. 5.State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG)/Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations