Climate Dynamics

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 429–446 | Cite as

Relevance of soil moisture for seasonal atmospheric predictions: is it an initial value problem?

Article

Abstract

Ensembles of boreal summer atmospheric simulations, spanning a 15-year period (1979–1993), are performed with the ARPEGE climate model to investigate the influence of soil moisture on climate variability and potential predictability. All experiments are forced with observed monthly mean sea surface temperatures. In addition to a control experiment with interactive soil moisture boundary conditions, two sensitivity experiments are performed. In the first, the interannual variability of the deep soil moisture is removed during the whole season, through a relaxation toward the monthly mean model climatology. In the second, only the variability of the initial soil moisture conditions is suppressed. While it is shown that soil moisture strongly contributes to the climate variability simulated in the control experiment, an analysis of variance indicates that soil moisture does not represent a significant source of predictability in most continental areas. The main exception is the North American continent, where climate predictability is clearly reduced through the use of climatological initial conditions. Using climatological soil moisture boundary conditions does not lead to strong and homogeneous impacts on potential predictability, thereby suggesting that the climate signals driven by the sea surface temperature variability are not generally amplified by interactive soil moisture and that the relevance of soil moisture for seasonal forecasting is mainly an initial value problem.

References

  1. Bougeault P (1985) A simple parametrization of the large-scale effects of cumulus convection. Mon Weather Rev 113: 2108–2121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deardorff JW (1977) A parametrization of the ground surface moisture content for use in atmospheric prediction models. J Appl Meteorol 16: 1182–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delworth TL, Manabe S (1988) The influence of potential evaporation on the variabilities of simulated soil wetness and climate. J Clim 1: 523–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delworth TL, Manabe S (1989) The influence of soil wetness on near-surface atmospheric variability. J Clim 2: 1447–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Déqué M, Dreveton C, Braun A, Cariolle D (1994) The ARPEGE/IFS atmosphere model, a contribution to the French Community climate modelling. Clim Dyn 10: 249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Déqué M et al (1999) Documentation ARPEGE-CLIMAT. Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Météo-France, Toulouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. Dirmeyer PA (2000) Using a global soil wetness dataset to improve seasonal climate simulation. J Clim 13: 2900–2922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dirmeyer PA (2001) Climate drift in a coupled land-atmosphere model. J Hydrometeorol 2: 89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dirmeyer PA (2003) The role fo the land surface background state in climate predictability. J Hydrometeorol 4: 599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Douville H (1998) Validation and sensitivity of the global hydrologic budget in stand-alone simulations with the ISBA land surface scheme. Clim Dyn 14: 151–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Douville H (2002) Influence of soil moisture on the Asian and African monsoons. Part II: interannual variability. J Clim 15: 701–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Douville H (2003) Assessing the influence of soil moisture on seasonal climate variability wiht AGCMs. J Hydrometeorol 4:1044–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Douville H, Chauvin F (2000) Relevance of soil moisture for seasonal climate predictions: a preliminary study. Clim Dyn 16: 719–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Douville H, Royer J-F, Mahfouf J-F (1995) A new snow parametrization for the Météo-France climate model. Part I: Validation in stand-alone experiments. Part II: Validation in a 3D GCM experiment. Clim Dyn 12: 21–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Douville H, Chauvin F, Broqua H (2001) Influence of soil moisture on the Asian and African monsoons. Part I: Mean monsoon and daily precipitation. J Clim 14: 2381–2403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Douville H, Bazile E, Caille P, Giard D, Noilhan J, Peirone L, Taillefer F (1999) Global Soil Wetness Project: forecast and assimilation experiments performed at Météo-France. J Meteorol Soc Japan 77: 305–316Google Scholar
  17. Douville H, Viterbo P, Mahfouf J-F, Beljaars ACM (2000) Validation of the optimum interpolation technique for sequential soil moisture analysis using FIFE data. Mon Weather Rev 128: 1733–1756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fennessy MJ, Shukla J (1999) Impact of initial soil wetness on seasonal atmospheric prediction. J Clim 12: 3167–3180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gates WL (1992) AMIP, The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 73: 1962–1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geleyn J-F, Bazile E, Bougeault P, Déqué M, Ivanovici V, Joly A, Labbe L, Piedelievre J-P, Piriou J-M, Royer J-F (1995) Atmospheric parametrization schemes in Météo-France’s Arpege NWP model. ECMWF Seminar Proc. Parameterization of sub-grid scale physical process (5–9 September 1994) 385–402Google Scholar
  21. Giard D, Bazile E (2000) Implementation of a new assimilation scheme for soil and surface variables in a global NWP model. Mon Weather Rev 128: 997–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibson RK, Kallberg P, Uppala S, Hernandez A, Nomura A, Serrano E (1997) ERA description. ECMWF Reanalysis project report, Series 1, 71 pp, European Center for Medium range Weather Forecast, Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. International GEWEX Project Office (1998) Global Soil Wetness Project: preliminary report on the pilot phase. IGPO Publication Series, 29Google Scholar
  24. Kanamitsu M, Lu CH, Schemm J, Ebisuzaki W (2003) The predictability of soil moisture and near-surface temperature in hindcasts of the NCEP seasonal forecast model. J Clim 16: 510–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koster RD, Suarez MJ, Heiser M (2000) Variability and predictability of precipitation at seasonal to interannual time scales. J Hydrometeorol 1: 26–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koster RD et al (2002) Comparing the degree of land-atmosphere interaction in four atmospheric general circulation models. J Hydrometeorol 363–375Google Scholar
  27. Louis J-F, Tiedtke M, Geleyn J-F (1982) A short history of the operational PBL-parametrization at ECMWF. ECMWF Workshop Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization, pp 59–80, ECMWF, Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahfouf J-F, Noilhan J (1996) Inclusion of gravitational drainage in a land surface scheme based on the force-restore method. J Appl Meteorol 35: 987–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morcrette J-J (1990) Impact of changes to the radiation transfer parametrization plus cloud optical properties in the ECMWF model. Mon Weather Rev 118: 847–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Noilhan J, Planton S (1989) A simple paramterization of land surface processes for meteorological models. Mon Weather Rev 117: 536–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reale O, Dirmeyer P (2002) Modeling the effect of land surface evaporation variability on precipitation variability. Part I: general response. J Hydrometeorol 433–450Google Scholar
  32. Ricard JL, Royer J-F (1993) A Statistical cloud scheme for use in an AGCM. Ann Geophys 11: 1095–1115Google Scholar
  33. Schlosser CA, Milly PC (2002) A model-based investigation of soil moisture predictability and associated climate predictability. J Hydrometeorol 3: 483–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shukla J, Mintz Y (1982) Influence of land-surface evapotranspiration on the earth’s climate. Science 215: 1498–1501Google Scholar
  35. Viterbo P (1996) The representation of surface processes in general circulation models. PhD Thesis, University of Lisbon, also ECMWF report, 201 pp, Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Von Storch H, Zwiers FW (1999) Statistical analysis in climate research. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 484Google Scholar
  37. Xie P, Arkin PA (1996) Analyses of Global monthly precipitation using gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model predictions. J Clim 9: 840–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag  2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Météo-France CNRM/GMGEC/UDC, Météo-FranceToulouse CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations