Climate Dynamics

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 57–68

Ice thickness variability in the Arctic Ocean between 1954–1990, results from a coupled ocean-ice-atmosphere column model

Article

Abstract

The interannual variation of the Arctic Ocean ice thickness during the period 1954–1990 is investigated by using a coupled ocean-ice-atmosphere column model. The model is forced by poleward energy flux in the atmosphere from NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data, ice export from satellite observations, cloudiness, and precipitation observed at the Russian North Pole drift stations. During the period 1977–1986 the model ice thickness decreased from 3.2 m to 2.0 m. The decrease is mainly caused by extra melting due to larger poleward energy flux in summer, and reduced ice growth in winter as a result of both increased cloudiness and energy flux. Precipitation and ice export are of less importance. A sensitivity study shows that the NCEP/NCAR data is accurate enough with respect to stochastic errors to ensure that the thinning is not caused by forcing errors. It is also shown that the poleward energy flux during summer is the dominant factor for regulating the ice thickness. The column model gives different results compared to other model studies using 2D ice models, especially towards the end of the period. Possible reasons for this disparity are discussed.

References

  1. Beesley JA (2000) Estimating the effect of clouds on the Arctic surface energy budget. J Geophys Res 105: 10,103–10,117Google Scholar
  2. Becker P, Björk G (1996) Residence times in the upper Arctic Ocean. J Geophys Res 101(C12): 28,377–28,396Google Scholar
  3. Björk G (1989) A one-dimensional time-dependent model for the vertical stratification of the upper Arctic Ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 19(1): 52–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Björk G (1997) The relation between ice deformation oceanic heat flux and the ice thickness distribution in the Arctic Ocean. J Geophys Res 102(C8): 18,681–18,698Google Scholar
  5. Björk G, Söderkvist J (2002) Dependence of the Arctic Ocean ice thickness distribution on the poleward energy flux in the atmosphere. J Geophys Res (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Briegleb BP, Bromwich DH (1998) Polar radiation budgets of the NCAR CCM3. J Clim 11: 1246–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ebert EE, Curry JA (1993) An intermediate one-dimensional thermodynamic sea ice model for investigating ice-atmosphere interactions. J Geophys Res 98(C6): 10,085–10,109Google Scholar
  8. Hack JJ, Boville BA, Briegleb BP, Kiehl JT, Rasch PJ, Williamson DL (1993) Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM2) NCAR Tech Note NCAR/TN-382+STR 108 pp Natl Cent For Atmos Res Boulder, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Hilmer M, Lemke P (2000) On the decrease of Arctic sea ice volume. Geophys Res Lett 27(22): 3751–3754Google Scholar
  10. Holloway G, Sou T (1999) Has Arctic sea ice rapidly thinned? J Clim 15(13): 1691–1701, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kwok R, Rothrock DA (1999) Variability of Fram Strait ice flux and North Atlantic Oscillation. J Geophys Res: 5177–5189Google Scholar
  12. Marshunova MS, Mishin AA (1994) Handbook of the radiation regime of the Arctic Basin: Results from the drift stations. In: Radionov VF, Colony R (eds) University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory Technical Report APL-UW TR9413 52 pp plus appendicesGoogle Scholar
  13. Maykut GA (1982) Large scale heat exchange and ice production in the central Arctic. J Geophys Res 87: 7971–7984Google Scholar
  14. Overland JE, Turet P (1994) Variability of the atmospheric energy flux across 70°N computed from the GFDL data set in Johannessen. In: OM, Muench RD, Overland JE (eds) Polar Oceans and their role in shaping the global environment. American Geophysical Union, pp 540Google Scholar
  15. Polyakov IV, Johnson MA (2000) Arctic decadal and interdecadal variability. Geophys Res Lett (24): 4097–4100Google Scholar
  16. Roach AT, Aagard K, Pease CH, Salo SA, Weingartner T, Pavlov V, Kulakov M (1995) Direct measurements of transport and water properties through the Bering Strait. J Geophys Res 100: 18443–18457Google Scholar
  17. Rothrock D, Yu AY, Maykut GA (1999) Thinning of the Arctic Sea-Ice cover. Geophys Res Lett 26: 3469–3473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thorndike AS (1992) A Toy model linking atmospheric thermal radiation and sea ice growth. J Geophys Res 97: 9401–9410Google Scholar
  19. Trenberth KE, Caron JM, Stepaniak DP (2001) The atmospheric energy budget and implications for surface fluxes and ocean heat transports. Clim Dyn 17(4): 259–276Google Scholar
  20. Walsh JE, Chapman L (2001) 20th-century sea-ice variations from observational data. Ann Glaciol 33: 444–448Google Scholar
  21. Zhang J, Rothrock DA, Steele M (1998) Correction to “Warming of the Arctic Ocean by a strengthened Atlantic inflow: Model results”. Geophys Res Lett 25: 3541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang JL, Rothrock D, Steele M (2000) Recent changes in Arctic sea ice: The interplay between ice dynamics and thermodynamics. J Clim 13: 17 3099–3114Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earth Sciences CentreGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations