Advertisement

Targeted head CT reduction for pediatric patients with hydrocephalus and traumatic brain injury: academic center institutional experience as an example of opportunities for further improvement

  • Allie Harbert
  • Weston Northam
  • Scott Elton
  • Carolyn QuinseyEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Recent studies aim to reduce radiation exposure associated with computed tomography (CT) using rapid-sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We evaluated imaging modalities used for hydrocephalus and traumatic brain injury (TBI) to identify opportunities for further radiation exposure reduction.

Methods

Pediatric (≤ 18 years) patients, with either hydrocephalus or TBI receiving a head CT or head MRI from 2009 to 2017, were quantified using ICD9, ICD10, and CPT codes at a large university hospital. The odds ratios of receiving each imaging modality year-to-year and receiving a MRI or CT in a given year with each diagnosis were calculated.

Results

Beginning in 2015, hydrocephalus patients were more likely to receive a MRI vs CT (p < 0.0001), with likelihood increasing in the following 2 years. TBI patients were more likely to receive a CT than an MRI from 2009 to 2017. There was a smaller overall decrease in CT scans in TBI patients (p < 0.05) than hydrocephalus patients (p < 0.0001) and a larger increase in MRI use in hydrocephalus patients (p < 0.05) than TBI patients (p < 0.05) from 2009 to 2017.

Conclusions

Use of CT to evaluate hydrocephalus significantly decreased over the last 3-year time period. However, CT use for TBI patients was inconsistent and did not decrease proportionally, potentially representing a belief that CT is more effective than MRI for detecting hemorrhage. There was greater use of MRI as an alternate imaging method in hydrocephalus patients than TBI patients. Head injury remains an area of improvement to decrease pediatric radiation exposure at our institution and may be an area in need of attention more broadly.

Keywords

Computed tomography Hydrocephalus TBI Ionizing radiation Rapid-sequence MRI 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Kathryn M. Pietrosimone, PhD, for editing this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

This study was not considered human subject research and was exempt from IRB oversight by the UNC IRB.

Conflict of interest

This work was supported by the Carolina Medial Student Research Program. On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Aldrink JH, Adler B, Haines J, Watkins D, Matthews M, Lubeley L, Wang W, King DR (2016) Patients exposed to diagnostic head and neck radiation for the management of shunted hydrocephalus have a significant risk of developing thyroid nodules. Pediatr Surg Int 32:565–569.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3894-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aw-Zoretic J, Seth D, Katzman G, Sammet S (2014) Estimation of effective dose and lifetime attributable risk from multiple head CT scans in ventriculoperitoneal shunted children. Eur J Radiol 83:1920–1924.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.07.006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE (2001) Estimated risks of radiation. Ajr 176:289–296.  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence : data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 2360:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg LI, Feigelson HS, Roblin D, Flynn MJ, Vanneman N, Smith-Bindman R (2013) The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 167:700–707.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.311 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheppard JP, Nguyen T, Alkhalid Y, Beckett JS, Salamon N, Yang I (2018) Risk of brain tumor induction from pediatric head CT procedures: a systematic literature review. Brain Tumor Res Treat 6:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2018.6.e4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Antonucci MC, Zuckerbraun NS, Tyler-Kabara EC et al (2017) The burden of ionizing radiation studies in children with ventricular shunts. J Pediatr 182:210–216.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.051 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gabriel S, Eckel LJ, DeLone DR, Krecke KN, Luetmer PH, McCollough C, Fletcher JG, Yu L (2014) Pilot study of radiation dose reduction for pediatric head CT in evaluation of ventricular size. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:2237–2242.  https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4056 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sheridan DC, Newgard CD, Selden NR et al (2016) QuickBrain MRI for the detection of acute pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Pediatr 19:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.7.PEDS16204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yue EL, Meckler GD, Fleischman RJ, Selden NR, Bardo DM, Chu O'Connor AK, Vu ET, Fu R, Spiro DM (2015) Test characteristics of quick brain MRI for shunt evaluation in children: an alternative modality to avoid radiation. J Neurosurg Pediatr 15:420–426.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.9.PEDS14207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Florin TA, Aronson PL, Hall M et al (2015) Emergency department use of computed tomography for children with ventricular shunts. J Pediatr 167:1382–1388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.09.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mannix R, Meehan WP, Monuteaux MC, Bachur RG (2012) Computed tomography for minor head injury: variation and trends in major United States pediatric emergency departments. J Pediatr 160:136–139.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.06.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stanley RM, Hoyle JD, Dayan PS et al (2014) Emergency department practice variation in computed tomography use for children with minor blunt head trauma. J Pediatr 165:1201–1206.e2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Engineer RS, Podolsky SR, Fertel BS et al (2018) A pilot study to reduce computed tomography utilization for pediatric mild head injury in the emergency department using a clinical decision support tool and a structured parent discussion tool. Pediatr Emerg Care 00:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hennelly KE, Mannix R, Nigrovic LE et al (2013) Pediatric traumatic brain injury and radiation risks: a clinical decision analysis. J Pediatr 162:392–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS et al (2009) Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 374:1160–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61558-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McGrew PR, Chestovich PJ, Fisher JD et al (2018) Implementation of a CT scan practice guideline for pediatric trauma patients reduces unnecessary scans without impacting outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 1.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Halaweish I, Riebe-Rodgers J, Randall A, Ehrlich PF (2017) Compliance with evidence-based guidelines for computed tomography of children with head and abdominal trauma. J Pediatr Surg:8–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iskandar BJ, Sansone JM, Medow J, Rowley HA (2010) The use of quick-brain magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of shunt-treated hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 101:147–151.  https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2004.101.2.0147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cohen AR, Caruso P, Duhaime AC, Klig JE (2015) Feasibility of “rapid” magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric acute head injury. Am J Emerg Med 33:887–890.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kochanek PM, Tasker RC, Carney N, Totten AM, Adelson PD, Selden NR, Davis-O'Reilly C, Hart EL, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Grant GA, Kissoon N, Reuter-Rice KE, Vavilala MS, Wainwright MS (2019) Guidelines for the management of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, third edition: update of the brain trauma foundation guidelines. Pediatr Crit Care Med 20:S1–S82.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001735 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations