Greenstick fracture-hinge decompressive craniotomy in infants: illustrative case and literature review of techniques for decompressive craniotomy without bone removal
We present the potential usefulness of a greenstick fracture-hinge decompressive craniotomy, a variant of a hinge-craniotomy, as an alternative technique for use with a decompressive craniectomy (DC) in infants. A literature review of hinge-craniotomy procedures and technical variants is also provided, with a focus on complications associated with a DC peculiar to infants and children.
Illustrative case presentation along with literature review.
Significant rates of complications associated with a DC and subsequent cranioplasty have been reported, such as bone flap resorption, hydrocephalus, cerebrospinal fluid collection, and infection, especially in infants. A hinge-craniotomy is an older technique reported to have potential usefulness with some modifications, though concerns have been raised about adequate decompression and definitive indications.
A DC procedure performed in children, especially infants, includes a significantly high risk of various complications; thus, a hinge-craniotomy technique is worthwhile for consideration to avoid such complications. Additional studies are required to clarify whether this technique may contribute to reduce complications related to a DC in infants and children.
KeywordsAbusive head trauma Acute subdural hematoma Children Decompressive craniotomy Decompressive craniectomy Hinge-craniotomy Infant
Acute subdural hematoma
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in regard to this study.
- 6.Sahuquillo J, Arikan F (2006) Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD003983Google Scholar
- 8.Taylor A, Butt W, Rosenfeld J, Shann F, Ditchfield M, Lewis E, Klug G, Wallace D, Henning R, Tibballs J (2001) A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Childs Nerv Syst 17:154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rocque BG, Agee BS, Thompson EM, Piedra M, Baird LC, Selden NR, Greene S, Deibert CP, Hankinson TC, Lew SM, Iskandar BJ, Bragg TM, Frim D, Grant G, Gupta N, Auguste KI, Nikas DC, Vassilyadi M, Muh CR, Wetjen NM, Lam SK (2018) Complications following pediatric cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a multicenter retrospective study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 22:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Grant GA, Jolley M, Ellenbogen RG, Roberts TS, Gruss JR, Loeser JD (2004) Failure of autologous bone-assisted cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg 100:163–168Google Scholar
- 22.Khan NR, Fraser BD, Nguyen V, Moore K, Boop S, Vaughn BN, Klimo P, Jr. (2017) Pediatric abusive head trauma and stroke. J Neurosurg Pediatr 20:183–190Google Scholar
- 25.Ko K, Segan S (2007) In situ hinge craniectomy. Neurosurgery 60:255–258; discussion 258-259Google Scholar
- 35.Dam Hieu P, Sizun J, Person H, Besson G (1996) The place of decompressive surgery in the treatment of uncontrollable post-traumatic intracranial hypertension in children. Childs Nerv Syst 12:270–275Google Scholar
- 36.Ardissino M, Tang A, Muttoni E, Tsang K (2018) Decompressive craniectomy in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of current evidence. Childs Nerv SystGoogle Scholar