The quality of life in extracorporeal life support survivors: single-center experience of a long-term follow-up
- 20 Downloads
To evaluate the health-related quality of life on a very long-term follow-up in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during neonatal and pediatric age.
Prospective follow-up study.
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary-care University-Hospital.
Out of 20 neonates and 21 children treated with ECMO in our center, 24 patients underwent short-term neurological follow-up. Twenty of them underwent long-term neurological follow-up.
Short-term follow-up was performed at 18 months and consisted in clinical evaluation, electroencephalography, and neuroimaging. Long-term follow-up was performed in 2017, at the mean period 19.72 years from ECMO (median 20.75, range 11.50–24.08) and consisted in a standardized questionnaires self-evaluation (PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale) of health-related quality of life and an interviewed about the presence of organ morbidity, school level, or work position.
Measurements and main results
Sixty-one percent (25/41) of the patients survived within 30 days after ECMO treatment. Short-term follow-up was performed in 24 patients (1 patient but died before the evaluation): 21 patients (87%) showed a normal neurological status, and 3 developed severe disability. Long-term follow-up was performed in 20 long-term survivors (3 patients were not possible to be contacted and considered lost to follow-up): mean age of patients at long-term follow-up was 21.23 (median 20.96, range 13.33–35.58) years; 90% (18/20) of them have no disability with a complete normal quality of life and 95% have no cognitive impairment.
ECMO represents a life-saving treatment for infants and children with respiratory and/or heart failure; survivors show a good quality of life comparable to healthy peers.
KeywordsExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation Quality of life Children Mortality Morbidity Neurologic disorders
The investigators acknowledge all the families of treated patients.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
- 4.ECLS Registry Report: International Summary July 2016. Available from URL: https://www.elso.org/Registry/Statistics/InternationalSummary.aspx
- 16.Garcia Guerra G, Robertson CM, Alton GY, Joffe AR, Moez EK, Dinu IA, Ross DB, Rebeyka IM, Lequier L, Western Canadian Complex Pediatric Therapies Follow-Up Group (2014) Health-related quality of life in pediatric cardiac extracorporeal life support survivors. Pediatr Crit Care Med 15:720–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Pressler R, Bady B, Binnie CD et al (2003) Neurophysiology of the neonatal period. In: Binnie CD, Cooper R, Mauguière F, Osselton J, Prior PF, Tedman BM (eds) Clinical neurophysiology, Vol II: EEG, paediatric neurophysiology, special techniques and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 450–601Google Scholar
- 21.Bayley N (1993) Bayley scales of infant development, 2nd edn. Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 22.Thorndike RL, Hagen EP, Stanford-Binet SJM (1986) Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition. Riverside Publishing, ItascaGoogle Scholar
- 23.Wechsler D (1967) Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence manual. The Psychological Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 24.Wechsler D (1991) Manual for the Wechsler intelligence scale for children III. The Psychological Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 29.Morris MC, Ittenbach RF, Godinez RI, Portnoy JD, Tabbutt S, Hanna BD, Hoffman TM, Gaynor JW, Connelly JT, Helfaer MA, Spray TL, Wernovsky G (2004) Risk factors for mortality in 137 pediatric cardiac intensive care unit patients managed with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Med 32:1061–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Hanekamp MN, Mazer P, van der Cammen-van Zijp MHM, van Kessel-Feddema BJM, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, Knuijt S, Zegers-Verstraeten JLA, Gischler SJ, Tibboel D, Kollée LAA (2006) Follow-up of newborns treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a nationwide evaluation at 5 years of age. Crit Care 10:R127CrossRefGoogle Scholar