Advertisement

Child's Nervous System

, Volume 34, Issue 10, pp 1889–1892 | Cite as

Posterior cranial fossa and spinal local infections

  • Federico BianchiEmail author
  • Gianpiero Tamburrini
Special Annual Issue

Abstract

Object

The aim of this paper is to review the current knowledge on the management of local infections in posterior cranial fossa (PCF) and spinal surgery; the center of our paper will be the diagnosis and management of infections of the wound, the subcutaneous tissue, and muscle strata.

Results and conclusions

Very few papers address the problem of local infections in posterior cranial fossa and spinal surgery. The largest amount of the literature data is indeed centered on how to deal with deep infections, CSF leak, and secondary meningitis or hardware infection. Concerning PCF surgery, a higher rate of local infections has been reported, compared with supratentorial surgery. To prevent such complications, prophylaxis remains the most important tool in dealing with local infections; a careful surgical planning and patient selection are also important. On the other hand, in dealing with local infection in spinal setting, there are several evidences that local vancomycin might help reducing them in adults as well as in children. The treatment protocol consists in antibiotic therapy and, whenever needed, wound revision to remove infectious material or to obtain a microbiological diagnosis. Prognosis has overall to be considered favorable both in the short term as well as in the long term.

Keywords

Posterior cranial fossa Spine Infection Local 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Winn HR (2016) Youmans and Winn Neurological Surgery, vol 4. 7th edn. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dubey A, Sung W-S, Shaya M, Patwardhan R, Willis B, Smith D, Nanda A (2009) Complications of posterior cranial fossa surgery—an institutional experience of 500 patients. Surg Neurol 72:369–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2009.04.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hadanny A, Rozovski U, Nossek E, Shapira Y, Strauss I, Kanner AA, Sitt R, Ram Z, Shahar T (2016) Craniectomy versus craniotomy for posterior fossa metastases: complication profile. World Neurosurg 89:193–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.076 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sciubba DM, Nelson C, Gok B, McGirt MJ, McLoughlin GS, Noggle JC, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, Bydon A, Gokaslan ZL (2008) Evaluation of factors associated with postoperative infection following sacral tumor resection. J Neurosurg Spine 9:593–599.  https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI.2008.9.0861 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    WHO (2016) Global Guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hey HWD, Thiam DW, Koh ZSD, Thambiah JS, Kumar N, Lau LL, Liu KPG, Wong HK (2017) Is intraoperative local vancomycin powder the answer to surgical site infections in spine surgery? Spine 42:267–274.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001710 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Theologis AA, Demirkiran G, Callahan M, Pekmezci M, Ames C, Deviren V (2014) Local intrawound vancomycin powder decreases the risk of surgical site infections in complex adult deformity reconstruction: a cost analysis. Spine 39:1875–1880.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000533 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sweet FA, Roh M, Sliva C (2011) Intrawound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusions: efficacy, drug levels, and patient outcomes. Spine 36:2084–2088.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff2cb1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tubaki VR, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP (2013) Effects of using intravenous antibiotic only versus local intrawound vancomycin antibiotic powder application in addition to intravenous antibiotics on postoperative infection in spine surgery in 907 patients. Spine 38:2149–2155.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Armaghani SJ, Menge TJ, Lovejoy SA, Mencio GA, Martus JE (2014) Safety of topical vancomycin for pediatric spinal deformity: nontoxic serum levels with supratherapeutic drain levels. Spine 39:1683–1687.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000465 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gans I, Dormans JP, Spiegel DA, Flynn JM, Sankar WN, Campbell RM, Baldwin KD (2013) Adjunctive vancomycin powder in pediatric spine surgery is safe. Spine 38:1703–1707.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829e05d3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J, Zhang H, Wang S (2015) Application of vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of internal fixation instrument exposure after early postoperative infection. Minerva Chir 70:17–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masumoto K, Nagata K, Oka Y, Kai H, Yamaguchi S, Wada M, Kusuda T, Hara T, Hirose SI, Iwasaki A, Taguchi T (2011) Successful treatment of an infected wound in infants by a combination of negative pressure wound therapy and arginine supplementation. Nutrition 27:1141–1145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2011.01.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pediatric Neurosurgery, Institute of NeurosurgeryCatholic University Medical SchoolRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations