Publication rates of the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery
Publication of a study is the end point of the process to contribute to the literature and confirm the scientific value of the study. Publication rates of the abstracts presented at the annual meetings of neurosurgery have been studied, previously. However, publication rates of the abstracts presented at the annual meetings of pediatric neurosurgery have not been reported, yet. We evaluated abstracts presented at the 38th annual meeting of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery (ISPN) held in South Korea, 2010.
We conducted this cross-sectional study by reviewing the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the ISPN, 2010. Titles and authors of the abstracts were surveyed using Google Scholar and PubMed/MEDLINE. Time to publication, origin of the study, journal name in which the study has been accepted and published, and type of study has been analyzed for each abstract.
The abstract booklet included 235 abstracts, consisted of 128 oral presentations (54%) and 107 electronic posters (46%). Fifty-nine (46%) of the oral presentations were published in a peer-reviewed journal. Laboratory studies were more likely to be published when compared to the clinical studies (72 vs. 39%). Thirty-two (30%) of the electronic posters were published in peer-reviewed journals. Most of the published abstracts were from Asia and Europe. Most of the abstracts were published in Child’s Nervous System and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics.
Publication rates of the abstracts presented at annual meeting of the ISPN were comparable to the other similar congresses. Oral presentations were more likely to be published. High publication rates of the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the ISPN suggested that the meeting had a high scientific value.
KeywordsAbstract Publication Oral Poster Journal Congress
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- 2.Meral UM, Urkan M, Alakus U, Lapsekili E, Iflazoglu N, Unlu A, Ozmen P, Demirbas S (2017) Publication rates of abstracts presented at the annual congress of the Turkish Society of Colorectal Surgery (years 2003-2011). Turk J Surg 33(2):87–90. https://doi.org/10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3448 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ohtori S, Kubota G, Inage K, Yamauchi K, Orita S, Suzuki M, Sakuma Y, Oikawa Y, Sainoh T, Sato J, Ishikawa T, Miyagi M, Kamoda H, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Inoue G, Takaso M, Toyone T, Takahashi K (2013) English publication rate of 3,205 abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and the annual research meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 18:1031–1036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Patel AJ, Cherian J, Fox BD, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A (2011) Publication patterns of oral and poster presentations at the annual meetings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg 115(6):1258–1261. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.7.JNS101538 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Jasko JJ, Wood JH, Schwartz HS (2003) Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual musculoskeletal tumor society meetings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415:98–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000093902.12372.76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Scherer RW, Ugarte-Gil C, Schmucker C, Meerpohl JJ (2015) Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 68(7):803–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.027 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 29.Okike K, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT, Heckman JD, Bhandari M (2008) Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American volume). J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(3):595–601. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00279 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar