Outcomes from primary surgical reconstruction of neonatal brachial plexus palsy in 104 children
- 27 Downloads
The outcome from microsurgical reconstruction of neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) varies, and comparison between different series is difficult, given the differences in preoperative evaluation, surgical strategies, and outcome analysis. To evaluate our results, we reviewed a series of children who underwent surgical treatment in a period of 14 years.
We made a retrospective review of 104 cases in which microsurgical repair of the brachial plexus was performed. Strength was graded using the Active Movement Scale. Whenever possible, upper palsies underwent surgery 4 to 6 months after birth and total lesions around 3 months. The lesions were repaired, according to the type of injury: neurolysis, nerve grafting, nerve transfer, or a combination of techniques. The children were followed for at least 24 months.
The majority of cases were complete lesions (56/53.8%). Erb’s palsy was present in 10 cases (9.6%), and 39 infants (37.5%) presented an extended Erb’s palsy. The surgical techniques applied were neurolysis (10.5%), nerve grafts (25.9%), nerve transfers (34.6%), and a combination of grafts and transfers (30.7%). The final outcome was considered poor in 41.3% of the cases, good in 34.3%, and excellent in 24%. A functional result (good plus excellent) was achieved in 58.3% of the cases.
There is no consensus regarding strategies for treatment of NBPP. Our surgical outcomes indicated a good general result comparing with the literature. However, our results were lower than the best results reported. Maybe the explanation is our much higher number of total palsy cases (53.8% vs. 25% in the literature).
KeywordsNeonatal brachial plexus palsy Brachial plexus reconstruction Nerve grafts Nerve transfers
- 10.Clarke HM, Curtis CG (1995) An approach to obstetrical brachial plexus injuries. Hand Clin 11:563–581Google Scholar
- 16.Gilbert A (1995) Long-term evaluation of brachial plexus surgery in obstetrical palsy. Hand Clin 11:583–594Google Scholar
- 17.Gilbert A, Tassin JL (1984) Surgical repair of the brachial plexus in obstetric paralysis. Chirurgie 110:70–75Google Scholar
- 19.Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B (1999) Associated factors in 1611 cases of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 93:536–540Google Scholar
- 29.Kawai H, Tsuyuguchi Y, Masada K, Kawabata H, Ono K, Yamamoto K, Tada K (1989) Identification of the lesion in brachial plexus injuries with root avulsion: a comprehensive assessment by means of preoperative findings, myelography, surgical exploration and intraoperative diagnosis. Neuro Orthop 7:15–23Google Scholar
- 38.Narakas AO (1981) Obstetrical brachial plexus injuries. Orthop Clin N Am 12:303–322Google Scholar
- 39.Narakas AO (1986) Injuries to the brachial plexus. In: Bora F (ed) The pediatric upper extremity: diagnosis and management. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 247–258Google Scholar
- 40.Narakas AO (1987) Obstetric brachial plexus injuries. In: Lamb DW (ed) The paralysed hand. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 116–135Google Scholar
- 43.Pondaag W, Malessy MJA (2006) Recovery of hand function following nerve grafting and transfer in obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J Neurosurg 105(1 Suppl):33–40Google Scholar
- 46.Sarac C, Duijnisveld BJ, van der Weide A, Schoones JW, Malessy MJ, Nelissen RG, Vlieland TP (2015) Outcome measures used in clinical studies on neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a systematic literature review using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Pediatr Rehabil Med 8:167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Vredeveld JW (2001) Clinical neurophysiological investigations. In: Gilbert A (ed) Brachial plexus injuries. Martin-Dunitz, London, pp 39–44Google Scholar