Advertisement

Child's Nervous System

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 247–255 | Cite as

Visual outcome after endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus

  • Ji-Ho Jung
  • Yong-Hyun Chai
  • Shin Jung
  • In-Young Kim
  • Woo-Youl Jang
  • Kyung-Sub Moon
  • Seul-Kee Kim
  • Sangjoon Chong
  • Seung-Ki Kim
  • Tae-Young JungEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Hydrocephalus-related symptoms are mostly improved after successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). However, visual symptoms can be different. This study was focused on visual symptoms. We analyzed the magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the orbit and visual outcomes.

Methods

From August 2006 to November 2016, 50 patients with hydrocephalus underwent ETV. The male-to-female ratio was 33:17, and the median age was 61 years (range, 5–74 years). There were 18 pediatric and 32 adult patients. Abnormal orbital MRI findings included prominent subarachnoid space around the optic nerves and vertical tortuosity of the optic nerves. We retrospectively analyzed clinical symptoms, causes of hydrocephalus, ETV success score (ETVSS), ETV success rate, ETV complications, orbital MRI findings, and visual impairment score (VIS).

Results

The median duration of follow-up was 59 months (range, 3–113 months). The most common symptoms were headache, vomiting, and gait disturbance. Visual symptoms were found in 6 patients (12%). The most common causes of hydrocephalus were posterior fossa tumor in 13 patients, pineal tumor in 12, aqueductal stenosis in 8, thalamic malignant glioma in 7, and tectal glioma in 4. ETVSS was 70 in 3 patients, 80 in 34 patients, and 90 in 13 patients. ETV success rate was 80%. ETVSS 70 showed the trend in short-term survival compared to ETVSS 90 and 80. ETV complications included epidural hematoma requiring operation in one patient, transient hemiparesis in two patients, and infection in two patients. Preoperative abnormal orbital MRI findings were found in 18 patients and postoperative findings in 7 patients. Four of six patients with visual symptoms had abnormal MR findings. Three patients did not show VIS improvement, including two with severe visual symptoms.

Conclusions

Patients with severe visual impairment were found to have bad outcomes. The visual symptoms related with increased intracranial pressure should be carefully monitored and controlled to improve outcomes.

Keywords

Hydrocephalus Endoscopic third ventriculostomy Visual outcome Orbital MRI findings 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, & Future Planning (2017R1A1A1A05001020).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Garcia LG, Lopez BR, Botella GI, Paez MD, da Rosa SP, Rius F, Sanchez MA (2012) Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score (ETVSS) predicting success in a series of 50 pediatric patients. Are the outcomes of our patients predictable? Childs Nerv Syst 28:1157–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Roth J, Constantini S, Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study G (2009) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. J Pediatr 155(254–259):e251Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Furlanetti LL, Santos MV, de Oliveira RS (2012) The success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children: analysis of prognostic factors. Pediatr Neurosurg 48:352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deopujari CE, Karmarker VS, Shaikh ST (2017) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: success and failure. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 60(3):306–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schirmer CM, Hedges TR 3rd (2007) Mechanisms of visual loss in papilledema. Neurosurg Focus 23:E5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zeiner HK, Prigatano GP, Pollay M, Biscoe CB, Smith RV (1985) Ocular motility, visual acuity and dysfunction of neuropsychological impairment in children with shunted uncomplicated hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 1:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andersson S, Hellstrom A (2009) Abnormal optic disc and retinal vessels in children with surgically treated hydrocephalus. Br J Ophthalmol 93:526–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arroyo HA, Jan JE, McCormick AQ, Farrell K (1985) Permanent visual loss after shunt malfunction. Neurology 35:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oyama H, Hattori K, Kito A, Maki H, Noda T, Wada K (2012) Visual disturbance following shunt malfunction in a patient with congenital hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 52:835–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Kestle JR, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Constantini S, Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study G (2010) Predicting who will benefit from endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with shunt insertion in childhood hydrocephalus using the ETV Success Score. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:310–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Passi N, Degnan AJ, Levy LM (2013) MR imaging of papilledema and visual pathways: effects of increased intracranial pressure and pathophysiologic mechanisms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:919–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fahlbusch R, Schott W (2002) Pterional surgery of meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale: surgical results with special consideration of ophthalmological and endocrinological outcomes. J Neurosurg 96:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rudolph D, Sterker I, Graefe G, Till H, Ulrich A, Geyer C (2010) Visual field constriction in children with shunt-treated hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:481–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sunil M, Payne C, Panda M (2011) Transient binocular visual loss: a rare presentation of ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction. BMJ Case Rep 2011: bcr1020114929Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carruth BP, Bersani TA, Hurley PE, Ko MW (2010) Visual improvement after optic nerve sheath decompression in a case of congenital hydrocephalus and persistent visual loss despite intracranial pressure correction via shunting. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 26(4):297–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    3r d RCN, Proctor BL, Baker RS, Pittman T (2006) Prevention of visual loss caused by shunt failure: a potential role for optic nerve sheath fenestration. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 104(2 Suppl):149–151Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Imamura Y, Mashima Y, Oshitari K, Oguchi Y, Momoshima S, Shiga H (1996) Detection of dilated subarachnoid space around the optic nerve in patients with papilloedema using T2 weighted fast spin echo imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60:108–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brodsky MC, Vaphiades M (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging in pseudotumor cerebri. Ophthalmology 105:1686–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hiyama T, Masumoto T, Shiigai M, Akutsu H, Matsumura A, Minami M (2015) Optic chiasmal edema observed on T2-weighted MR images: a reversible finding in obstructive hydrocephalus. Jpn J Radiol 33:140–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suzuki H, Takanashi J, Kobayashi K, Nagasawa K, Tashima K, Kohno Y (2001) MR imaging of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:196–199PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji-Ho Jung
    • 1
  • Yong-Hyun Chai
    • 1
  • Shin Jung
    • 1
  • In-Young Kim
    • 1
  • Woo-Youl Jang
    • 1
  • Kyung-Sub Moon
    • 1
  • Seul-Kee Kim
    • 2
  • Sangjoon Chong
    • 3
  • Seung-Ki Kim
    • 3
  • Tae-Young Jung
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryChonnam National University Hwasun Hospital & Medical SchoolHwasun-gunRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyChonnam National University Hwasun Hospital & Medical SchoolHwasun-gunRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Division of Pediatric NeurosurgerySeoul National University Children’s HospitalSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations