Skip to main content
Log in

Lacosamide treatment of childhood refractory focal epilepsy: the first reported side effect in paediatric patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Lacosamide (LCM) is an effective antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for the treatment of focal epilepsy in both children and adults. The aim of this observational study was to review our centre’s experience with LCM and to characterise its efficacy and tolerability as an adjunct therapy in children with refractory focal epilepsy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 12 paediatric patients who underwent treatment with LCM from January 2014 to December 2015. We recorded the treatment response at three time points: at 3 and 6 months after LCM therapy and at the final follow-up visit. Children showing seizure reduction ≥ 50% were considered responders.

Results

We included 12 patients (five boys), and their mean age was 13.8 years (range: 6.2–17.6 years) at the end of LCM treatment. The average length of follow-up after starting LCM was 23 months (11–37 months). Eight patients (66%) had > 50% reduction in seizures at the 3-month follow-up visit, and seven (58%) had > 50% reduction at the 6-month follow-up visit. Six patients (50%) maintained ≥ 50% reduction in seizures at the final follow-up visit. Two patients (16.6%) were seizure free at the 6-month and final follow-up visits. Common adverse side effects included dizziness, ataxia, nausea, and vomiting. Two patients developed status epilepticus (SE), one each at 3 and 11 days after the first LCM dose; they both discontinued treatment.

Conclusions

Our study points to the efficacy of LCM in a small paediatric group. Furthermore, it was important to report status epilepticus after LCM administration in the paediatric population for the first time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kwan P, Brodie MJ (2000) Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med 342:314–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Casas-Fernández C, Martínez-Bermejo A, Rufo-Campos M, Smeyers-Durá P, Herranz-Fernández JL, Ibáñez-Micó S et al (2012) Efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide in the concomitant treatment of 130 patients under 16 years of age with refractory epilepsy: a prospective, open-label, observational, multicenter study in Spain. Drugs R D 12(4):187–197

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Doty P, Hebert D, Mathy FX, Byrnes W, Zackheim J, Simontac- chi K (2013) Development of lacosamide for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1291:56–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Guilhoto LM, Loddenkemper T, Gooty VD, Rotenberg A, Takeoka M, Duffy FH et al (2011) Experience with lacosamide in a series of children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol 44(6):414–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gavatha M, Ioannou I, Papavasiliou AS (2011) Efficacy and tolerability of oral lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 20(4):691–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heyman E, Lahat E, Levin N, Berkovitch M, Gandelman-Marton R (2012) Preliminary efficacy and safety of lacosamide in children with refractory epilepsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 16(1):15–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grosso S, Parisi P, Spalice A, Verrotti A, Balestri P (2014) Efficacy and safety of lacosamide in infants and young children with refractory focal epilepsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 18(1):55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JS, Kim H, Lim BC, Chae JH, Choi J, Kim KJ et al (2014) Lacosamide as an adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Brain and Development 36(6):510–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pasha I, Kamate M, Didagi SK (2014) Efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide as an adjunctive therapy in children with refractory partial epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol 51(4):509–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yorns WR Jr, Khurana DS, Carvalho KS, Hardison HH, Legido A, Valencia I. (2014) Efficacy of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in children with refractory epilepsy. J Child Neurol 29(1): 23–27

  11. Verrotti A, Loiacono G, Pizzolorusso A, Parisi P, Bruni O, Luchetti A et al (2013) Lacosamide in pediatric and adult patients: comparison of efficacy and safety. Seizure 22(3):210–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rastogi RG, Ng YT (2012) Lacosamide in refractory mixed pediatric epilepsy: a prospective add-on study. J Child Neurol 27(4):492–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Toupin JF, Lortie A, Major P, Diadori P, Vanasse M, Rossignol E et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of lacosamide as an adjunctive therapy for refractory focal epilepsy in paediatric patients: a retrospective single-centre study. Epileptic Disord 17(4):436–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Villanueva V, Lopez-Gomariz E, Lopez-Trigo J, Palau J, García M, Villarroya T et al (2012) Rational polytherapy with lacosamide in clinical practice: results of a Spanish cohort analysis RELACOVA. Epilepsy Behav 23(3):298–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buck ML, Goodkin HP (2012) Use of lacosamide in children with refractory epilepsy. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 17:211–219

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Papacostas SS (2015) Status epilepticus developing during lacosamide monotherapy. BMJ Case Rep 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edibe Pembegul Yildiz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yildiz, E.P., Ozkan, M.U., Bektas, G. et al. Lacosamide treatment of childhood refractory focal epilepsy: the first reported side effect in paediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst 33, 2023–2027 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3586-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3586-8

Keywords

Navigation