Advertisement

Child's Nervous System

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 813–818 | Cite as

Early outcomes of spinal growth tethering for idiopathic scoliosis with a novel device: a prospective study with 2 years of follow-up

  • M. BoudissaEmail author
  • A. Eid
  • E. Bourgeois
  • J. Griffet
  • A. Courvoisier
Original Paper

Abstract

Questions/purposes

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a 3D spine deformity that worsens during the whole growth. New methods for spinal growth modulation with flexible spinal implants have been described to avoid progression of the deformity during growth spurt. The main limitations are that no specific ancillaries and devices are available, which makes the surgery technically demanding.

Methods

We have developed a new method of spinal growth tethering using minimal invasive videothoracoscopic approach. Fixation is performed with staples and synthetic ligament on the lateral aspect of vertebral bodies on main curvature convexity. Patients with progressive thoracic idiopathic scoliosis despite the brace treatment were included. The clinical and radiological examinations were compared before and 2 years after surgery.

Results

Six patients with flexible thoracic curves with a mean age 11.2 ± 1.2 years and a mean Cobb angle 45° ± 10° (35–60) were operated. All were skeletally immature. At last follow-up, the Cobb angle was stable. None of the patient underwent fusion.

Conclusions

The procedure allowed a stabilization of the deformity during growth spurt. Validated devices and further studies with longer term follow-up are needed to confirm the efficiency of this technique. This small cohort of patients is a source of reflection for further medical devices developments.

Level of Evidence

Level 4 case series comparing to not randomized studies.

Keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spinal growth tethering Spinal ligamentoplasty Novel device Vertebral body stapling 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.

Supplementary material

381_2017_3367_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (799 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 798 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Courvoisier A, Drevelle X, Vialle R, Dubousset J, Skalli W (2013) 3D analysis of brace treatment in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:2449–2455CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nachemson AL, Peterson LE (1995) Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:815–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Charles YP, Daures JP, de Rosa V, Diméglio A (2006) Progression risk of idiopathic juvenile scoliosis during pubertal growth. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:1933–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Samdani AF, Ames RJ, Kimball JS, Pahys JM, Grewal H, Pelletier GJ, Betz RR (2015) Anterior vertebral body tethering for immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: one-year results on the first 32 patients. Eur Spine J 24:1533–1539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Samdani AF, Ames RJ, Kimball JS, Pahys JM, Grewal H, Pelletier GJ, Betz RR (2014) Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: two-year results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:1688–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crawford CH 3rd, Lenke LG (2010) Growth modulation by means of anterior tethering resulting in progressive correction of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:202–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Courvoisier A, Eid A, Bourgeois E, Griffet J (2015) Growth tethering devices for idiopathic scoliosis. Expert Rev Med Devices 12:449–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lenke LG (2003) Anterior endoscopic discectomy and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:S36–S43Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pompeo E, Mancini F, Ippolito E, Mineo TC (2010) Videothoracoscopic approach to the spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Thorac Surg Clin 20:311–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG et al (2013) Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N England J Med 369:1512–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green DW, Lawhorne TW, Widmann RF et al (2003) Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2078–2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Betz RR, Kim J, D'Andrea LP, Mulcahey MJ, Balsara RK, Clements DH (2003) An innovative technique of vertebral body stapling for the treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a feasibility, safety, and utility study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:S255–S265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Betz RR, Ranade A, Samdani AF, Chafetz R, D'Andrea LP, Gaughan JP, Asghar J, Grewal H, Mulcahey MJ (2010) Vertebral body stapling: a fusionless treatment option for a growing child with moderate idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Theologis AA, Cahill P, Auriemma M, Betz R, Diab M (2013) Vertebral body stapling in children younger than 10 years with idiopathic scoliosis with curve magnitude of 30° to 39°. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1583–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O'leary PT, Sturm PF, Hammerberg KW, Lubicky JP, Mardjetko SM (2011) Convex hemiepiphysiodesis: the limits of vertebral stapling. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1579–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Courvoisier A (2016) The future of academic innovation in the field of medical devices: is innovation still possible in orthopedics? Expert Rev Med Devices 13:807–813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Boudissa
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. Eid
    • 1
  • E. Bourgeois
    • 1
  • J. Griffet
    • 1
  • A. Courvoisier
    • 1
  1. 1.Orthopedic Pediatric Surgery DepartmentGrenoble Alpes University HospitalGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery DepartmentGrenoble Alpes University HospitalGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations