Traumatic brain injury alters long-term hippocampal neuron morphology in juvenile, but not immature, rats
- 546 Downloads
Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a prominent yet understudied medical condition that can profoundly impact brain development. As the juvenile injured brain matures in the wake of neuropathological cascades during potentially critical periods, circuit alterations may explain neurological consequences, including cognitive deficits. We hypothesize that experimental brain injury in juvenile rats, with behavioral deficits that resolve, will lead to quantifiable structural changes in hippocampal neurons at chronic time points post-injury.
Controlled cortical impact (CCI), a model of focal TBI with contusion, was used to induce brain injury on post-natal day (PND) 17 juvenile rats. The histological consequence of TBI was quantified in regions of the hippocampus at post-injury day 28 (PID28) on sections stained using a variation of the Golgi-Cox staining method. Individual neuronal morphologies were digitized from the dentate gyrus (DG), CA3, and CA1 regions.
Soma area in the ipsilateral injured DG and CA3 regions of the hippocampus increased significantly at PID28 in comparison to controls. In CA1, dendritic length and dendritic branching decreased significantly in comparison to controls and the contralateral hemisphere, without change in soma area. To extend the study, we examined neuronal morphology in rats with CCI at PND7. On PID28 after CCI on PND7 rats, CA1 neurons showed no injury-induced change in morphology, potentially indicating an age-dependent morphological response to injury.
Long-lasting structural alterations in hippocampal neurons of brain-injured PND17 juvenile animals, but not PND7 immature animals, suggest differential plasticity depending on age-at-injury, with potential consequences for later function.
KeywordsGolgi Juvenile traumatic brain injury (TBI) Controlled cortical impact injury (CCI) Rats Hippocampus Dendritic length Branching points Soma area
The authors would like to sincerely thank the contributions of Dan Santone for the preliminary studies that made this research possible. Also, Rachel K. Rowe, PhD, Jordan L. Harrison, Jenna M. Ziebell, PhD, and the rest of the Translational Neurotrauma Research Team–Phoenix, AZ, provided thoughtful feedback on early drafts of the manuscript. These experiments were carried out at the University of Pittsburgh and analyzed and prepared for publication at the University of Arizona College of Medicine–Phoenix. This work was supported by the Walter L. Copeland Fund of the Pittsburgh Foundation Funding for Cranial Research and Phoenix Children’s Hospital Mission Support Funds.
Conflict of interest
The authors would like to disclose that there exist no conflicts of interest.
- 4.Fletcher JM, Ewing-Cobbs L, Francis DJ, Levin HS (1995) Variability in outcomes after traumatic brain injury in children: a developmental perspective. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 7.Levin HS, Ewing-Cobbs L (1995) Neurobehavioral outcome of pediatric closed head injury. Oxford Univesity Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 9.Biagas KV, Grundl PD, Kochanek PM, Schiding JK, Nemoto EM (1992) Posttraumatic hyperemia in immature, mature and aged rats: autoradiographic determination of cerebral blood flow. Soc Neurosci Abstr 18:1088Google Scholar
- 11.Levin HS (1985) Outcome after head injury: general considerations and neurobehavioral recovery, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
- 17.Whalen MJ, Dalkara T, You Z, Qiu J, Bermpohl D, Mehta N, Suter B, Bhide PG, Lo EH, Ericsson M, Moskowitz MA (2008) Acute plasmalemma permeability and protracted clearance of injured cells after controlled cortical impact in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow and Metab : Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow and Metab 28:490–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.You Z, Yang J, Takahashi K, Yager PH, Kim HH, Qin T, Stahl GL, Ezekowitz RA, Carroll MC, Whalen MJ (2007) Reduced tissue damage and improved recovery of motor function after traumatic brain injury in mice deficient in complement component C4. J Cereb Blood Flow and Metab: Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow and Metab 27:1954–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ajao DO, Pop V, Kamper JE, Adami A, Rudobeck E, Huang L, Vlkolinsky R, Hartman RE, Ashwal S, Obenaus A, Badaut J (2012) Traumatic brain injury in young rats leads to progressive behavioral deficits coincident with altered tissue properties in adulthood. J Neurotrauma 29:2060–2074PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Adelson PD, Whalen MJ, Kochanek PM, Robichaud P, Carlos TM (1998) Blood brain barrier permeability and acute inflammation in two models of traumatic brain injury in the immature rat: a preliminary report. Acta Neurochirurgica Suppl 71:104–106Google Scholar
- 32.Scheibel ME, Scheibel AB (1978) The methods of Golgi. Academic, New York, pp 89–114Google Scholar
- 37.Mao H, Elkin BS, Genthikatti VV, Morrison Iii B, 3rd, Yang KH (2013) Why is CA3 more vulnerable than CA1 in experimental models of controlled cortical impact-induced brain injury? J NeurotraumaGoogle Scholar
- 42.Varma MR, Dixon CE, Jackson EK, Peters GW, Melick JA, Griffith RP, Vagni VA, Clark RS, Jenkins LW, Kochanek PM (2002) Administration of adenosine receptor agonists or antagonists after controlled cortical impact in mice: effects on function and histopathology. Brain Res 951:191–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar