Child's Nervous System

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 199–207 | Cite as

The safety of the intraoperative sacrifice of the deep cerebral veins

Review Paper

Abstract

Background

The effect of surgically ligating the deep cerebral veins is often thought to be of significant risk. That concern and the paucity of information on surgery of the deep venous system confound surgical decision making when operations involve manipulation of the deep cerebral veins.

Discussion

The authors review the human and animal literature on the selective sacrifice of the deep cerebral veins. Robust experimental studies and limited clinical experience indicate that occlusion of one or several deep cerebral veins is generally safe.

Keywords

Craniotomy Deep cerebral vein Internal cerebral vein Pineal tumor Vein of Galen 

Notes

Acknowledgments

No financial support in any form was received in conjunction with the generation of this submission, and none of the authors has any personal or institutional financial interest in drugs, materials, or devices described in this manuscript.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in the following text are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the US Government.

References

  1. 1.
    McComb JG (1987) Is there risk to occlusion of the deep cerebral veins when removing pineal location tumors. Concepts in Pediatr Neurosurg 7:72–80Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailey P (1934) Peculiarities of the intracranial venous system and their clinical significance. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 32:1105Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rhoton AL Jr (2003) In: Apuzzo MLJ (ed) Cranial anatomy and surgical approaches. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Schaumburg, p 230Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stein BM (1979) Surgical treatment of pineal tumors. Clin Neurosurg 26:490–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bassiouni H, Asgari S, Konig HJ, Stolke D (2008) Meningiomas of the falcotentorial junction: selection of the surgical approach according to the tumor type. Surg Neurol 69:339–349, discussion 349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davidson L, Krieger MD, McComb JG (2011) Posterior interhemispheric retrocallosal approach to pineal region and posterior fossa lesions in a pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:527–533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moshel YA, Parker EC, Kelly PJ (2009) Occipital transtentorial approach to the precentral cerebellar fissure and posterior incisural space. Neurosurgery 65:554–564, discussion 564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suzuki J, Iwabuchi T (1965) Surgical removal of pineal tumors (pinealomas and teratomas). Experience in a series of 19 cases. J Neurosurg 23:565–571PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krause F (1926) Operative freilegung der vierhugel nebst Beobachtungen uber hirndruck und dekompression. Zbl Chir 53:2812–2819Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stein BM (1971) The infratentorial supracerebellar approach to pineal lesions. J Neurosurg 35:197–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaplan HA (1984) Results of obliteration of specific cerebral veins and dural venous sinuses: animal and human studies. In: Kapp J, Schmidek H (eds) The cerebral venous system and its disorders. Grune & Stratton, Inc, Orlando, pp 275–282Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith RS, Sanford RA (1984) Disorders of the deep cerebral veins. In: Kapp JP, Schmidek HH (eds) The cerebral venous system and its disorders. Grune & Stratton, Inc., Orlando, pp 547–555Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hassler O (1966) Deep cerebral venous system in man. A microangiographic study on its areas of drainage and its anastomoses with the superficial cerebral veins. Neurology 16:505–511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Braun JP, Tournade A, Ammerich H (1976) Transverse anastomoses of the veins at the base of the brain. Neuroradiology 12:165–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schlesinger B (1939) The venous drainage of the brain, with special reference to the Galenic system. Brain 62:274–291Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dandy W (1936) Operative experience in cases of pineal tumor. Arch Surg 33:19–46Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Youssef AS, Downes AE, Agazzi S, Van Loveren HR (2011) Life without the vein of Galen: clinical and radiographic sequelae. Clin Anat 24(6):776–785PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Konovalov AN, Spallone A, Pitzkhelauri DI (1996) Meningioma of the pineal region: a surgical series of 10 cases. J Neurosurg 85:586–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Odake G (1992) Meningioma of the falcotentorial region: report of two cases and literature review of occlusion of the galenic system. Neurosurgery 30:788–793, discussion 793–784PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sakaki S, Shiraishi T, Takeda S, Matsuoka K, Sadamoto K (1984) Occlusion of the great vein of Galen associated with a huge meningioma in the pineal region. Case report. J Neurosurg 61:1136–1140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Browder J, Kaplan HA, Krieger AJ (1976) Anatomical features of the straight sinus and its tributaries. J Neurosurg 44:55–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hammock MK, Milhorat TH, Earle K, Di Chiro G (1971) Vein of Galen ligation in the primate. Angiographic, gross, and light microscopic evaluation. J Neurosurg 34:77–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dandy W, Blackfan K (1914) Internal hydrocephalus: an experimental, clinical and pathologic study. Am J Dis Child 8:406–482Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Newman D (1882) Glasg Med J 3:161Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Browning W (1887) Am J Nerve Dis 14:260Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bedford THB (1934) The great vein of Galen and the syndrome of increased intracranial pressure. Brain 57:1–24Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levinson A (1929) The cerebrospinal fluid. LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bedford THB (1934) The venous system of the velum interpositum of the rhesus monkey and the effects of experimental occlusion of the great vein of Galen. Brain 57:255–265Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ono M, Rhoton AL Jr, Peace D, Rodriguez RJ (1984) Microsurgical anatomy of the deep venous system of the brain. Neurosurgery 15:621–657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horrax G (1937) Extirpation of a huge pinealoma from a patient with pubertas praecox: a new operative approach. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 37:385–395Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stern WE, Batzdorf U, Rich JR (1971) Challenges of surgical excision of tumors in the pineal region. Bull Los Angel Neurol Soc 36:105–118Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kunicki A (1960) Operative experiences in 8 cases of pineal tumor. J Neurosurg 17:815–823PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dandy W (1921) An operation for the removal of pineal tumors. Surg Gynec Obstet 33:113–119Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Caron JP, Nick J, Contamin F, Singer B, Comoy J, Keravel Y (1977) Tolerance of ligation and of aseptic thrombosis of deep cerebral veins in man. Apropos of 4 cases. Ann Med Interne (Paris) 128:899–906Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rhoton AL Jr (2002) The cerebral veins. Neurosurgery 51:S159–S205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hirsch JF, Zouaoui A, Renier D, Pierre-Kahn A (1979) A new surgical approach to the third ventricle with interruption of the striothalamic vein. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 47:135–147Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goetzen B (1964) Veins internes du cerveau humain: morphologie et topographie des anastomosis veineuses centro-peripheriques du cerveau. Arch Anat Path 12:126–133Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rhoton AL Jr (2000) The posterior fossa veins. Neurosurgery 47:S69–S92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chaynes P (2004) Microsurgical anatomy of the venous drainage of the mesencephalodiencephalic junction. Neurosurgery 54:678–685, discussion 685–676PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Page LK (1977) The infratentorial-supracerebellar exposure of tumors in the pineal area. Neurosurgery 1:36–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Reid WS, Clark WK (1978) Comparison of the infratentorial and transtentorial approaches to the pineal region. Neurosurgery 3:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Andrews RJ, Bringas JR (1993) A review of brain retraction and recommendations for minimizing intraoperative brain injury. Neurosurgery 33:1052–1063, discussion 1063–1054PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chi JH, Lawton MT (2006) Posterior interhemispheric approach: surgical technique, application to vascular lesions, and benefits of gravity retraction. Neurosurgery 59: ONS41-49; discussion ONS41-49Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    McNatt SA, Sosa IJ, Krieger MD, McComb JG (2011) Incidence of venous infarction after sacrificing middle-third superior sagittal sinus cortical bridging veins in a pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:224–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nazzaro JM, Shults WT, Neuwelt EA (1992) Neuro-ophthalmological function of patients with pineal region tumors approached transtentorially in the semisitting position. J Neurosurg 76:746–751PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Xu W, Mellergard P, Ungerstedt U, Nordstrom CH (2002) Local changes in cerebral energy metabolism due to brain retraction during routine neurosurgical procedures. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:679–683Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kilic T, Ozduman K, Cavdar S, Ozek MM, Pamir MN (2005) The galenic venous system: surgical anatomy and its angiographic and magnetic resonance venographic correlations. Eur J Radiol 56:212–219PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of NeurosurgeryWalter Reed National Military Medical CenterBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Division of NeurosurgeryChildren’s Hospital Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Neurosurgery ClinicBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations