Third ventriculostomy in infants younger than 1 year old
- 217 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
Introduction
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) gains more attention each day in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Some authors have questioned the effectiveness of the procedure for the treatment of infants younger than 1 year. More recent studies revealed that the effectiveness of the procedure is more related to the etiology of the disease than to the age of the patient.
Materials and methods
We studied retrospectively the effectiveness of third ventriculostomy in our service: 75 endoscopic procedures, from which 48 were ETVs. Among the ETVs, 30 were used to treat aqueductal stenosis, three for Dandy–Walker, eight for Chiari type II.
Results
When the patients were stratified by the etiology of the hydrocephalus, there was a statistically significant difference among the groups studied with higher success among patients with aqueductal stenosis the (90 %) and lower for the treatment of Chiari II-related hydrocephalus (50 % of success). With the patients stratified by age groups, there was no significant difference in terms of the success of the treatment.
Conclusion
Our results have shown that the effectiveness of ETV is not actually age-related, but etiology-related.
Keywords
Third ventriculostomy Infants Failure Hydrocephalus NeuroendoscopyReferences
- 1.Balthasar AJ, Kort H, Cornips EM, Beuls EA, Weber JW, Vles JS (2007) Analysis of the success and failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants less than 1 year of age. Childs Nerv Syst 23(2):151–155. doi: 10.1007/s00381-006-0219-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Beems T, Grotenhuis JA (2002) Is the success rate of endoscopic third ventriculostomy age-dependent? An analysis of the results of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in young children. Childs Nerv Syst 18(11):605–608. doi: 10.1007/s00381-002-0652-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Dandy WE, Blackfan KD (1914) Internal hydrocephalus: a clinical and pathological study. Am J Dis Child 8:406–482Google Scholar
- 4.de Ribaupierre S, Rilliet B, Vernet O, Regli L, Villemure JG (2007) Third ventriculostomy vs ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric obstructive hydrocephalus: results from a Swiss series and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst 23(5):527–533. doi: 10.1007/s00381-006-0283-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Di Rocco C, Massimi L, Tamburrini G (2006) Shunts vs endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants: are there different types and/or rates of complications? A review. Childs Nerv Syst 22(12):1573–1589. doi: 10.1007/s00381-006-0194-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Drake JM (2007) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in pediatric patients: the Canadian experience. Neurosurgery 60(5):881–886. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255420.78431.E7, discussion 881–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Etus V, Ceylan S (2005) Success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children less than 2 years of age. Neurosurg Rev 28(4):284–288. doi: 10.1007/s10143-005-0407-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Faggin R, Bernardo A, Stieg P, Perilongo G, d'Avella D (2009) Hydrocephalus in infants less than six months of age: effectiveness of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Eur J Pediatr Surg 19(4):216–219. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1202282 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Gorayeb RP, Cavalheiro S, Zymberg ST (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 1 year of age. J Neurosurg 100(5 Suppl Pediatrics):427–429. doi: 10.3171/ped.2004.100.5.0427 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Javadpour M, Mallucci C, Brodbelt A, Golash A, May P (2001) The impact of endoscopic third ventriculostomy on the management of newly diagnosed hydrocephalus in infants. Pediatr Neurosurg 35(3):131–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Koch-Wiewrodt D, Wagner W (2006) Success and failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in young infants: are there different age distributions? Childs Nerv Syst 22(12):1537–1541. doi: 10.1007/s00381-006-0191-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.L’Espinasse VL (1943) Neurological surgery, 2nd edn. Lea and Ferbiger, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lipina R, Reguli S, Dolezilova V, Kuncikova M, Podesvova H (2008) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus in children younger than 6 months of age: is it a first-choice method? Childs Nerv Syst 24(9):1021–1027. doi: 10.1007/s00381-008-0616-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Mixter W (1923) Ventriculostomy and puncture of the floor of the third ventricle. Boston Med Surg J 188:277–278Google Scholar
- 15.Mohanty A, Biswas A, Satish S, Vollmer DG (2008) Efficacy of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in fourth ventricular outlet obstruction. Neurosurgery 63(5):905–913. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000333262.38548.E1, discussion 913–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Smyth MD, Tubbs RS, Wellons JC 3rd, Oakes WJ, Blount JP, Grabb PA (2003) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus secondary to central nervous system infection or intraventricular hemorrhage in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 39(5):258–263. doi: 10.1159/000072871 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Takahashi Y (2006) Long-term outcome and neurologic development after endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus shunting during infancy. Childs Nerv Syst 22(12):1591–1602. doi: 10.1007/s00381-006-0190-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Wagner W, Koch D (2005) Mechanisms of failure after endoscopic third ventriculostomy in young infants. J Neurosurg 103(1 Suppl):43–49. doi: 10.3171/ped.2005.103.1.0043 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Warf BC (2005) Hydrocephalus in Uganda: the predominance of infectious origin and primary management with endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 102(1 Suppl):1–15. doi: 10.3171/ped.2005.102.1.0001 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Yadav YR, Jaiswal S, Adam N, Basoor A, Jain G (2006) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants. Neurol India 54(2):161–163PubMedGoogle Scholar