Advertisement

Child's Nervous System

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 441–444 | Cite as

The importance of very early decompressive craniectomy as a prevention to avoid the sudden increase of intracranial pressure in children with severe traumatic brain swelling (retrospective case series)

  • András CsókayEmail author
  • John Amaechi Emelifeonwu
  • László Fügedi
  • István Valálik
  • József Láng
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the retrospective case series of eight consecutive patients is to call our attention to the optimal timing of decompressive craniectomy (DC) in children.

Method

We report the outcomes of eight children under the age of 12 with severe head injuries. DC was performed at different intracranial pressure (ICP; 20 and 25 mmHg) levels.

Results

Our results suggest that above 20 mmHg, very fast progression of ICP (within15min) can occur, which may limit the time available to plan and perform DC with a successful patient outcome.

Conclusion

Considering the anamnestic data, it could be useful to perform DC at 20–22 mmHg ICP in young patients in order to prevent the potential of very fast brain swelling if there is no possibility to perform durotomy within 20 min after the onset of raising the ICP. It is especially considerable in poor countries where the emergency route could be less organized because of locations of building and extreme load of the staff. Further controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the indication and standardization of early decompressive craniectomy as a standard preventive therapy in pediatric severe traumatic brain swelling.

Keywords

Decompressive craniectomy Traumatic brain swelling Vascular tunnel 

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L et al (2011) Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 364:1493–1502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sahuquillo J (2009) Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Available via www.cochrane.org Issue 2. Accessed 2009
  3. 3.
    Kleist-Welch Guerra W, Gaab RM, Dietz H (1999) Surgical decompression for traumatic brain swelling: indications and results. J Neurosurg 90:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hutchinson PJ, Menon DK, Kirkpatrick PJ (2005) Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury—time for randomised trials? Acta Neurochir 147:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Münch E, Horn P, Schürer L, Piepgras A (2000) Management of severe traumatic brain injury by decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurgery 47:315–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Bogaev CA (1997) Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic cerebral edema. Neurosurgery 41:84–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paul TA, Kern HG (2007) Sinking skin flaps, paradoxical herniation, and external brain tamponade: a review of decompressive craniectomy management. Neurocrit Care 9:269–276Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang XF, Wen L, Shen F et al (2008) Surgical complications secondary to decompressivecraniectomy in patients with head injury: series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:1241–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dam Hieu P, Sizun J, Person H et al (1996) The place of decompressive surgery in the treatment of uncontrollable post-traumatic intracranial hypertension in children. Childs Nerv Syst 12:270–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feickert HJ, Drommer S, Heyer R (1999) Severe head injury in children: impact of risk factors on outcome. J Trauma 47:33–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Bonis P, Pompucci A, Mangiola A et al (2010) Post-traumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy: an underestimated risk factor. J Neurotrauma 11:1965–1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chibarro S, Marsella M, Romano A et al (2008) Combined internal uncusectomy and decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe closed head injury: experience with 80 cases. J Neurosurg 108(1):74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jiang J-Y, Xu W, Li W-P et al (2005) Efficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. J Neurotrauma 6:623–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ruf B, Heckman M, Schroth I et al (2003) Early decompressive craniectomy and duraplasty for refractory intracranial hypertension in children: results of a pilot study. Crit Care 7:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Csókay A, Láng J, Lajgut A et al (2011) In vitro and in vivo surgical and MRI evidence to clarify the effectiveness of the vascular tunnel technique in the course of decompressive craniectomy. Neurol Res 7:747–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • András Csókay
    • 1
    Email author
  • John Amaechi Emelifeonwu
    • 2
  • László Fügedi
    • 1
  • István Valálik
    • 1
  • József Láng
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryBAZ County HospitalMiskolcHungary
  2. 2.University Hospital of WalesCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations