Neurodevelopmental functioning of infants with untreated single-suture craniosynostosis during early infancy
- 575 Downloads
Single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) is a congenital craniofacial disorder, in which premature fusion of one of the skull sutures restricts and distorts growth of the cranium and underlying brain. This disorder of prenatal onset occurs during a critical phase of rapid growth and development of the immature brain. Craniosynostosis carries a known risk of developmental impairment. The neurodevelopmental sequelae of SSC prior to treatment remains however incompletely understood. This study sought to determine the neurodevelopmental sequelae of untreated single-suture craniosynostosis during early infancy.
Fifty-six consecutive patients with unoperated SSC (sagittal, metopic and unicoronal) comprised the sample cohort. Patients were aged between 4 and 16 months (M = 8.9 months, SD = 2.9 months). Neurodevelopmental functioning was assessed with the mental (Mental Development Index) and motor (Psychomotor Development Index) scales of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, second edition.
Children with SSC displayed significantly lower mean mental (M = 97.7, SD = 6.7, p < 0.05) and motor (M = 87.7, SD = 13.0, p < 0.001) scores than normative population averages. The distribution of these scores also differed significantly from the normative distribution; an increased rate of significant motor developmental delay was found, and none of the children displayed accelerated development. Subgroup comparisons between the primary diagnostic subtypes in this sample revealed no significant differences in mental or motor skill functioning.
Untreated SSC is associated with an increased incidence of developmental delay during early infancy, with motor skills appearing the most vulnerable to impairment during this developmental phase.
KeywordsCraniosynostosis Neurodevelopmental function Craniofacial anomalies Early brain development
- 1.Cohen MJ, MacLean R (2000) Craniosynostosis: diagnosis, evaluation, and management. Oxford Uni Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fernbach S, Feinstein K (1991) Radiologic evaluation of children with craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Clin North America 2:569–586Google Scholar
- 18.Reardon W, Wilkes D, Rutland P, Pulleyn L, Malcolm S, Dean J, Evans R, Jones B, Hayward R, Hall C, Nevin N, Baraister M, Winter R (1997) Craniosynostosis associated with FGFR3 pro250arg mutation results in a range of clinical presentations including unisutural sporadic craniosynostosis. J Med Genet 34:632–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Bayley N (1993) Bayley scales of infant development (2nd edition)(Bayley-II). Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 34.Kolb B, Gibb R (1999) Neuroplasticity and recovery of function after brain injury. In: Stuss G, Winocur G, Robertson I (eds) Cognitive neurorehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 9–25Google Scholar
- 36.Duchowny M (1996) Identification of surgical candidates and timing of operation: an overview. In: Wyllie E (ed) The treatment of epilepsy: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 967–975Google Scholar
- 38.Finger S, Stein D (1982) Brain damage and recovery. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 45.Rubinstein C, Varni J, Katz E (1990) Cognitive functioning in long-term survivors of childhood leukemia: a prospective analysis. Dev Behav Pediatr 11:301–305Google Scholar
- 46.Anderson V (1988) Recovery of function: the myth of cerebral plasticity. In: Matheson M, Newman H (eds) 13th annual brain impairment conference. Academic, Sydney, pp 223–247Google Scholar