Maternal periconceptional factors affect the risk of spina bifida-affected pregnancies: an Italian case–control study
- First Online:
- 415 Downloads
Neural tube defects, including spina bifida and anencephaly, are the second most common birth defects with an incidence in Italy of 0.4–1/1,000. Information on factors playing a role in the pathogenesis of spina bifida is based on populations with different exposures, lifestyle, social and cultural habits compared to Italian people. Our objective was to fill this gap by using data from a case–control interview study carried out at the G. Gaslini Children’s Hospital, Genoa, from 2000 to 2008.
We surveyed questionnaires from 133 case mothers and 273 control women providing information on periconceptional risk factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to estimate risks by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).
Univariate results suggest that birth order, low maternal educational level, age, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, high caffeine intake, lack of folate supplementation, low and high calorie diet, occasional consumption of fruit and vegetables, high emotional stress, and environmental pollution are associated with an increased spina bifida risk. Nevertheless, high caffeine intake (OR = 10.82; 95% CI, 3.78–31), low calorie diet (OR = 5.15; 95%CI, 1.79–14), occasional consumption of fruit and vegetables (OR = 3.38; 95% CI, 1.67–6.82), alcohol consumption (OR = 3.05; 95% CI, 1.24–7.50) and, above all, lack of folate supplementation at any time of pregnancy (OR = 20.54; 95% CI, 5.41–77) mainly determined spina bifida risk in the multivariate analysis.
Our findings point out that a common underlying mechanism, a disturbed folate/homocysteine metabolism, may be causative for the burden of spina bifida in the Italian population.
KeywordsNeural tube defects (NTD) Spina bifida Case–control study Lifestyle Periconceptional risk factors
- 1.Bailley L (2006) Evaluation of a new recommended dietary allowance for folate. J Am Diet Assoc 92:463–468Google Scholar
- 3.Busby A, Abramsky L, Dolk H, Armstrong B, Addor MC, Anneren G, Armstrong N, Baguette A, Barisic I, Berghold A, Bianca S, Braz P, Calzolari E, Christiansen M, Cocchi G, Daltveit AK, De Walle H, Edwards G, Gatt M, Gener B, Gillerot Y, Gjergja R, Goujard J, Haeusler M, Latos-Bielenska A, McDonnell R, Neville A, Olars B, Portillo I, Ritvanen A, Robert-Gnansia E, Rösch C, Scarano G, Steinbicker V (2005) Preventing neural tube defects in Europe: a missed opportunity. Repro Toxic 20(3):393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Canfield MA, Ramadhani TA, Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Waller DK, Mosley BS, Royle MH, Olney RS; National Birth Defects Prevention Study (2009) Anencephaly and spina bifida among Hispanics: maternal, sociodemographic, and acculturation factors in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 85(7):637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.EUROCAT Working Group (2002) Surveillance of congenital anomalies in Europe 1980–1999. EUROCAT Report no. 8. EUROCAT University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, UKGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kushi L, Lenart EB, Willett WC (1995) Health implications of Mediterranean diets in light of contemporary knowledge. Plant foods and dairy products Am J Clin Nutr 61:1407SGoogle Scholar
- 24.Little L, Elwood JM (1991) Epidemiology of neural tube defects. In: Kiley M (ed) Reproductive and perinatal epidemiology. CRC Press, Boston, pp 251–336Google Scholar
- 53.Yin Z, Xu W, Xu C, Zhang S, Zheng Y, Wang W, Zhou B (2010) A population-based case–control study of risk factors for neural tube defects in Shenyang, China. Childs Nerv Syst (in press)Google Scholar