Advertisement

Child's Nervous System

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 967–974 | Cite as

Cognitive and functional outcome in spina bifida–Chiari II malformation

  • Michael D. Jenkinson
  • Sophie Campbell
  • Caroline Hayhurst
  • Simon Clark
  • Jothy Kandasamy
  • Maggie K. Lee
  • Ann Flynn
  • Peter Murphy
  • Conor L. Mallucci
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The long-term outcome in spina bifida–Chiari II–hydrocephalus complex is poorly understood. Traditional neurosurgical outcome measures are crude. Neuropsychological testing is increasingly important in outcome assessment. We investigated the health, disability, lifestyle and cognitive function in adults who had myelomeningocoele closure at birth.

Methods

Adult patients under routine follow-up were assessed in a joint neurosurgery/neuropsychology clinic. Patients completed lifestyle questionnaires, the hydrocephalus outcome questionnaire (HOQ) and underwent cognitive testing. Clinical variables including number of shunt revisions, shunt infection and surgical decompression of foramen magnum, which may influence outcome, were investigated.

Results

Twenty-one adults with a median age of 35 years were investigated. All had treated hydrocephalus, and eight had foramen magnum decompression for headache or progressive brainstem symptoms with stabilisation of symptoms in seven and improvement in one. Only eight patients were living independently, five were in paid employment and five work voluntarily. HOQ scores for cognitive function were lower (0.56 ± 0.20; mean ± standard deviation (SD)) than those for physical (0.64 ± 0.15) and social–emotional (0.65 ± 0.17) health. Cognitive function varied across the cohort with attention most severely affected (73.9 ± 17.0; mean ± SD). Repeated episodes of shunt malfunction or foramen magnum decompression were not associated with a worse cognitive function.

Conclusions

Despite intervention in childhood and adequate cerebrospinal fluid diversion the prognosis for independent living into adulthood remains poor. All patients have elements of cognitive impairment. Structural brain abnormalities may be more important determinants of cognitive outcome than shunt malfunction.

Keywords

Spina bifida Chiari Hydrocephalus Cognitive function Outcome 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Dr. G.M. Hunt and Dr. P. Oakeshott for providing their lifestyle questionnaire, and Dr. A.V. Kulkarni for supplying the hydrocephalus outcome questionnaire.

References

  1. 1.
    Bower C, D'Antoine H, Stanley FJ (2009) Neural tube defects in Australia: trends in encephaloceles and other neural tube defects before and after promotion of folic acid supplementation and voluntary food fortification. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 85(4):269–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Group MVSR (1991) Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the medical research council vitamin study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group 338(8760):131–137, LancetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kondo A, Kamihira O, Ozawa H (2009) Neural tube defects: prevalence, etiology and prevention. Int J Urol 16(1):49–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hunt GM (1990) Open spina bifida: outcome for a complete cohort treated unselectively and followed into adulthood. Dev Med Child Neurol 32(2):108–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hunt GM, Oakeshott P (2003) Outcome in people with open spina bifida at age 35: prospective community based cohort study. Bmj 326(7403):1365–1366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hunt GM, Oakeshott P (2004) Lifestyle in adults aged 35 years who were born with open spina bifida: prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 1(1):4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pollack IF, Pang D, Albright AL, Krieger D (1992) Outcome following hindbrain decompression of symptomatic chiari malformations in children previously treated with myelomeningocele closure and shunts. J Neurosurg 77(6):881–888PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stevenson KL (2004) Chiari Type II malformation: past, present, and future. Neurosurg Focus 16(2):E5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mirzai H, Ersahin Y, Mutluer S, Kayahan A (1998) Outcome of patients with meningomyelocele: the Ege University experience. Childs Nerv Syst 14(3):120–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soare PL, Raimondi AJ (1977) Intellectual and perceptual-motor characteristics of treated myelomeningocele children. Am J Dis Child 131(2):199–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barf HA, Verhoef M, Jennekens-Schinkel A, Post MW, Gooskens RH, Prevo AJ (2003) Cognitive status of young adults with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol 45(12):813–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iddon JL, Morgan DJ, Loveday C, Sahakian BJ, Pickard JD (2004) Neuropsychological profile of young adults with spina bifida with or without hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75(8):1112–1118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scott RB, Stoodley CJ, Anslow P, Paul C, Stein JF, Sugden EM, Mitchell CD (2001) Lateralized cognitive deficits in children following cerebellar lesions. Dev Med Child Neurol 43(10):685–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rapoport M, van Reekum R, Mayberg H (2000) The role of the cerebellum in cognition and behavior: a selective review. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 12(2):193–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vachha B, Adams RC, Rollins NK (2006) Limbic tract anomalies in pediatric myelomeningocele and chiari II malformation: anatomic correlations with memory and learning–initial investigation. Radiology 240(1):194–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vinck A, Maassen B, Mullaart R, Rotteveel J (2006) Arnold-Chiari-II malformation and cognitive functioning in spina bifida. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(9):1083–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barnes M, Dennis M, Hetherington R (2004) Reading and writing skills in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 10(5):655–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dennis M, Barnes M (2002) Math and numeracy in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Dev Neuropsychol 21(2):141–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dennis M, Jewell D, Drake J, Misakyan T, Spiegler B, Hetherington R, Gentili F, Barnes M (2007) Prospective, declarative, and nondeclarative memory in young adults with spina bifida. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 13(2):312–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hetherington R, Dennis M, Barnes M, Drake J, Gentili F (2006) Functional outcome in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 22(2):117–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Rabin D (2004) An instrument to measure the health status of children with hydrocephalus: the hydrocephalus outcome questionnaire. J Neurosurg: Pediatrics 101:134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Rabin D, Dirks PB, Humphreys RP, Rutka JF (2004) Measuring the health status of children with hydrocephalus using a new outcome measure. J Neurosurg: Pediatrics 101:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jenkinson MD, Hayhurst C, Al-Jumaily M, Kandasamy J, Clark S, Mallucci CL (2009) The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in adult patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 110(5):861–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, Tomita T, Ito JA (2001) Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg 34:114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Davis BE, Daley CM, Shurtleff DB, Duguay S, Seidel K, Loeser JD, Ellenbogan RG (2005) Long-term survival of individuals with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 41(4):186–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vandertop WP, Asai A, Hoffman HJ, Drake JM, Humphreys RP, Rutka JT, Becker LE (1992) Surgical decompression for symptomatic chiari II malformation in neonates with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg 77(4):541–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Caldarelli M, Di Rocco C, La Marca F (1996) Shunt complications in the first postoperative year in children with myelomeningocoele. Childs Nerv Syst 12(12):748–754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chakraborty A, Crimmins D, Hayward R, Thompson D (2008) Toward reducing shunt placement rates in patients with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1(5):361–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thompson DN (2009) Postnatal management and outcome for neural tube defects including spina bifida and encephalocoeles. Prenat Diagn 29(4):412–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    O'Brien DF, Javadpour M, Collins DR, Spennato P, Mallucci CL (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an outcome analysis of primary cases and procedures performed after ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction. J Neurosurg 103(5 Suppl):393–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fritsch MJ, Kienke S, Ankermann T, Padoin M, Mehdorn HM (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants. J Neurosurg 56(6):1271–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hunt GM, Oakeshott P, Kerry S (1999) Link between the CSF shunt and acheivement in adults with spina bifida. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67:591–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Barf HA, Verhoef M, Post MW, Jennekens-Schinkel A, Gooskens RH, Mullaart RA, Prevo AJ (2004) Educational career and predictors of type of education in young adults with spina bifida. Int J Rehabil Res 27(1):45–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. Jenkinson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sophie Campbell
    • 2
  • Caroline Hayhurst
    • 1
  • Simon Clark
    • 1
  • Jothy Kandasamy
    • 1
  • Maggie K. Lee
    • 1
  • Ann Flynn
    • 2
  • Peter Murphy
    • 2
  • Conor L. Mallucci
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryThe Walton Centre Foundation NHS TrustLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Department of NeuropsychologyThe Walton Centre Foundation NHS TrustLiverpoolUK
  3. 3.School of Cancer StudiesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  4. 4.Department of NeurosurgeryRoyal Liverpool Children’s HospitalLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations