Advertisement

Child's Nervous System

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 391–397 | Cite as

Cognitive and social functioning in children and adolescents after the removal of craniopharyngioma

  • Agnieszka Ondruch
  • Agnieszka Maryniak
  • Tomasz Kropiwnicki
  • Marcin Roszkowski
  • Paweł Daszkiewicz
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to assess cognitive, emotional and social functioning in children and adolescents after the removal of craniopharyngioma.

Methods

Twenty-seven children operated for craniopharyngioma and their parents participated in the study. Cognitive functions were assessed with WISC-R/WAIS-R-PL and Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test. Parents completed Achenbach’s Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) questionnaires on problems in functioning and psychopathological symptoms and took part in an interview on children coping in everyday life.

Results

Eighty-two percent of patients were diagnosed with an average level of intellectual functioning. No child received results indicating mental disability. In half of the children, effectiveness of visual memory was reduced, despite normal visual–spatial abilities. The results in the CBCL scale indicated more frequent presence of psychopathological symptoms—especially social problems, depression, anxiety and withdrawal. The most frequent problems in children’s everyday functioning included inability to control emotions, difficulties in learning, unsatisfactory peer relationships, and unattractive appearance resulting from hormonal disorders (short height and obesity). One third of parents also reported problems with pathological appetite in their children.

Conclusions

Despite normal intellectual abilities and relatively good physical condition, children after removal of craniopharyngioma experience many difficulties in everyday life regarding social relationships, emotion control and learning. The analogy between the above-mentioned symptoms and symptoms observed in patients after infantile damage in the frontal area leads to an observation that, apart from endocrine disorders, damage to the frontal lobe caused by the growth of tumour and operational intervention is of crucial importance to the further development of children with craniopharyngioma.

Keywords

Craniopharyngioma Psychopathology Quality of life Cognitive functions 

References

  1. 1.
    May JA, Krieger MD, Bowen I, Geffner ME (2006) Craniopharyngioma in childhood. Adv Pediatr 53:183–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vernet O, Montes JL, Farmer J-P, Blundell E, Bertrand G, Freeman CR (1999) Long term results of multimodality treatment of craniopharyngioma in children. J Clin Neurosci 6(3):199–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fisher PG, Jenab J, Goldhwaite PT, Tihen T, Wharam MD, Foer DR, Burger PC (1998) Outcomes and failure patterns in childhood craniopharyngiomas. Child’s Nerv Syst 14:558–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shi XE, Wu B, Fan T, Zhou Z-Q, Zhang YL (2008) Craniopharyngioma: surgical experience of 309 cases in China. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 110:151–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellhouse J, Holland A, Pickard J (2003) Psychiatric, cognitive and behavioral outcomes following craniopharyngioma and pituitary adenoma surgery. Br J Neurosurg 17(4):319–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bawden HN, Salisbury S, Eses G, Morehouse R (2009) Neuropsychological functioning following craniopharyngioma removal. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31(1):140–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waber DP, Pomeroy SL, Chiverton AM, Kieran MW, Scott M, Goumnerova LC, Rivkin MJ (2006) Everyday cognitive function after craniopharyngioma in childhood. Pediatr Neurol 34(1):13–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poretti A, Grotzer MA, Schonle E, Boltshauser E (2004) Outcome in craniopharyngioma in children: long-term complications and quality of life. Dev Med Child Neurol 46:220–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Papazoglou A, King TZ, Morris RZ, Krawiecki N (2009) Parent report of attention problems predicts later adaptive functioning in children with brain tumors. Child Neuropsychol 15:40–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eslinger PJ, Flaherty-Craig CV, Benton AL (2004) Developmental outcomes after early prefrontal cortex damage. Brain Cogn 55:84–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grattan LM, Eslinger PJ (1991) Frontal lobe damage in children and adults: a comparative review. Dev Neuropsychol 7(3):283–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanemura H, Aihara M, Aoki S, Araki T, Nakazawa S (2003) Development of prefrontal lobe in infants and children: a three-dimensional magnetic resonance volumetric study. Brain Dev 25:195–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eslinger PJ, Grattan LM, Damasio H, Damasio AR (1992) Developmental consequences of childhood frontal lobe damage. Arch Neurol 49:764–769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson SW, Wisnowski JL, Barrash J, Damasio H, Tranel D (2009) Consistency of neuropsychological outcome following damage to prefrontal cortex in the first years of life. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31(2):170–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eslinger PJ, Grattan LM, Geder L (1995) Impact of frontal lesions on rehabilitation and recovery from acute brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 5:161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agnieszka Ondruch
    • 1
  • Agnieszka Maryniak
    • 1
  • Tomasz Kropiwnicki
    • 1
  • Marcin Roszkowski
    • 1
  • Paweł Daszkiewicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryChildren’s Memorial Health InstituteWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations