Treatment and outcomes for pediatric head injuries in Mississippi
- 132 Downloads
This report summarizes the treatments and outcomes of a large series of patients with pediatric head injuries (PHIs), who were admitted to a tertiary pediatric trauma center at the University of Mississippi Medical Center from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2006.
Data were retrieved from the Department of Neurosurgery’s Brain Trauma Registry (BTR) on patients who are ≤16 years old. Data include Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and injury severity scores (ISS) on admission and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores at 6 months follow-up.
The BTR registered 554 patients with accidental and nonaccidental PHIs. Follow-up was complete in 98.2%. Aggressive first-tier management with ventricular drainage was used to lower intracranial pressure. Vasopressors were used only to correct hypotension. Second-tier therapies were used infrequently. Craniectomies (14 patients) were associated with good outcomes (GOS 4–5) in nine patients; hypothermia (six patients) and barbiturate (four patients) therapies were ineffective. All 439 patients with ISS <25 showed good outcomes. Fifteen of 16 patients with GCS >8 and ISS ≥25 had good outcomes. In 134 patients with severe PHIs (GCS ≤8), all 45 with ISS <25 and 46 with ISS ≥25 showed good outcomes. Forty-three patients with GCS ≤8 and ISS ≥25 had poor outcomes. Of these patients, 38 died; 22 died within 3 days of admission.
This study indicated that poor outcomes occurred only in PHIs with severe generalized trauma. While 28.4% of patients with GSC ≤8 died, more than half of these sustained nonsurvivable injuries. Aggressive medical management with ventricular drainage was the mainstay of therapy.
KeywordsPediatric head injuries Treatment Trauma registry
The authors wish to acknowledge the pediatric intensivists, attending surgeons, and nursing personnel in the pediatric ICU for their dedication to the care of children with head injuries. The authors also wish to thank Laura Day and Carolyn Wilson for secretarial assistance.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no commercial or proprietary interests in any drug, device, or equipment mentioned in this article.
- 2.Athens AB, Fantus RJ (2008) NTDB National Trauma Data Bank 2008. Pediatric report version 8.0. American College of Surgeons, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 3.Borse NN, Gilchrist J, Dellinger AM et al (2008) CDC childhood injury report: patterns of unintentional injuries among 0- to 19-year-olds in the United States, 2000–2006. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 4.Contant CF Jr, Narayan RK (1996) Prognosis after head injury. In: Yumans YR (ed) Neurological surgery, 4th edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1792–1812Google Scholar
- 6.Forbes ML, Adelson PD, Kochanek PM (2008) Critical care management of traumatic brain injury. In: Albright AL, Pollack IF, Adelson PD (eds) Principles and practice of pediatric neurosurgery, 2nd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 833–847Google Scholar
- 9.Hanigan W, Esposito D, Spinosa F et al (2009) Development, funding, and effectiveness of a trauma system for pediatric head injuries (PHIs) in Mississippi. AANS Neurosurgeon, in pressGoogle Scholar
- 13.Krause JF (1995) Epidemiological features of brain injury in children: occurrence, children at risk, causes and manner of injury, severity, and outcome. In: Broman SH, Michel ME (eds) Traumatic head injury in children. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 22–39Google Scholar
- 14.Langlois GA (2000) Traumatic brain injury in the United States: assessing outcomes in children summary and recommendations from the Expert Working Group, Division of Acute Care, Rehabilitation Research and Disability Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA, October 26–27Google Scholar
- 16.Marmarou A (2001) The American brain injury consortium. In: Miller LP, Hayes RL, Newcomb JK (eds) Head trauma: basic, preclinical, and clinical directions. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 371–384Google Scholar
- 17.Michaud LJ, Rivara FP, Grady MS et al (1992) Predictors of survival and severity of disability after severe brain injury in children. Neurosurg On-Line 31:254–264Google Scholar
- 22.Thurman DJ, Alverson C, Browne D et al (1999) Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a report to congress. Division of Acute Care, Rehabilitation Research, and Disability Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 24.Van Natta TL, Morris JA Jr (2000) Injury scoring and trauma outcomes. In: Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Moore EE (eds) Trauma, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 69–78Google Scholar
- 25.Van Natta TL, Morris JA Jr (2000) Injury scoring and trauma outcomes. In: Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Moore EE (eds) Trauma, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 72, Fig. 5-2Google Scholar