Craniovertebral junction database analysis: incidence, classification, presentation, and treatment algorithms
- 700 Downloads
The initial treatment of bony lesions at the craniocervical junction consisted of posterior decompression with enlargement of the foramen and removal of the posterior arch of the atlas and axis vertebra. This was regardless of the site of compression. Needless to say, the results were poor when an irreducible ventral lesion at the craniocervical junction caused compression of the cervicomedullary area. It was predictable that an adverse outcome would occur in approximately 35–40% of patients treated with dorsal decompression with a fixed anterior abnormality at the craniovertebral junction. Thus, it became essential to identify the causes of failure and recognize the pathology as well as attempt to improve the treatment. The need to identify natural history led to a prospective database. This database now lists 5,300 patients who were analyzed. Of these, 2,000 were children and this has been reviewed here.
Craniovertebral abnormalities in children
Review of symptoms showed that children with craniovertebral abnormalities present with failure to thrive, weakness, basilar migraine, dysphagia, sleep apnea, scoliosis, and the cervical central cord syndrome. Torticollis was seen in the very young.
Imaging techniques and treatment for craniovertebral abnormalities
New imaging techniques were utilized as they became available. Unexplained neurological symptoms and signs associated with craniovertebral abnormalities in children required angiography which was performed with dynamic motion studies. All children with reducible craniocervical abnormalities underwent stabilization. In irreducible abnormalities, decompression was paramount with a fusion to be done immediately. The decompression was accomplished in the direction in which encroachment occurred.
Treatment algorithm and classification
A treatment algorithm was formulated as a result of this database and a classification of the craniovertebral abnormalities; that holds good for the entire spectrum.
KeywordsCraniocervical junction Spinal cord compression Klippel–Feil syndrome Chiari malformation
- 2.Bell C (1830) The nervous system of the human body. Longman and Co., London, pp 403–406 Ch 118Google Scholar
- 3.Chamberlain WE (1938/1939) Basilar impression (platybasia). Yale J Biol Med 11:487Google Scholar
- 5.Fang HSY, Ong AB (1962) Direct anterior approach to the upper cervical spine. J Bone Jt Surg (AM) 44:1588–1604Google Scholar
- 8.Gladstone J, Erickson-Powell W (1914–1915) Manifestation of occipital vertebra and fusion of atlas with occipital bone. J Anat Physiol 49:190–199Google Scholar
- 10.Grisel P (1930) Enucleation de l’atlas et torticollis nasopharyngien. Presse Med 38:50–56 ParisGoogle Scholar
- 12.List CF (1941) Neurologic syndromes accompanying developmental anomalies of occipital bone, atlas and axis. Arch Neurol Psychiat 45:577–616Google Scholar
- 14.Menezes AH (1996) Rheumatological disorders. In: Menezes AH, Sonntag VKH (eds) Principles of spinal surgery. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 705–722Google Scholar
- 15.Menezes AH (2003) Acquired abnormalities of the craniovertebral junction. In: Winn HR (ed) Youman’s neurological surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 4569–4585Google Scholar
- 19.Parke WW (1978) The vascular relations of the upper cervical vertebrae. Orthop Clin North Amer 9:879–889Google Scholar
- 23.Schiff DCM, Parke WW (1972) The arterial blood supply of the odontoid process (Dens). Anat Rec 172:399–400Google Scholar
- 25.VanGilder JC, Menezes AH, Dolan K (1987) Textbook: craniovertebral junction abnormalities. Futura, Mount Kisco, pp 1–255Google Scholar