Cumulative diagnostic radiation exposure in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: a review
- 201 Downloads
Children may be more vulnerable to diagnostic radiation exposure because of the increased dose–volume ratio and the increased lifetime risk per unit dose of radiation from early exposure. Moreover, recent radiological literature suggests that exposure to ionizing radiation from imaging studies may play a role in the later development of malignancies.
Materials and Methods
We review the literature and present two illustrative clinical examples of children (each child developed head and neck malignancies during their late teen years) with hydrocephalus requiring multiple cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt revisions and diagnostic computerized tomography (CT) scans throughout their life.
The literature reviewed suggests that children are more prone to diagnostic radiation exposure. Although it is not possible to prove that the multiple diagnostic studies result in malignancies, our review of the literature and illustrative cases describing malignancy risk and radiation exposure should give clinicians pause when considering requesting multiple diagnostic CT studies in children during the evaluation of possible CSF shunt dysfunction. Alternative tests such as “shunt MRI” protocols should be considered for patients and used whenever possible to minimize exposure to ionizing radiation.
KeywordsPediatric Diagnostic Induced malignancy Hydrocephalus
The authors express their sincere appreciation for the contributions to this manuscript from Drs. Arie Perry (Department of Pathology, Washington University) and Glenn Fletcher (Department of Physics, Washington University).
- 1.Ashley W, Leonard JR, Smyth MD, Ojemann JG, Park TS (2003) Rapid MRI in the evaluation of shunted hydrocephalus. AANS/CNS Joint Section on Pediatric Neurological Surgery, Salt Lake CityGoogle Scholar
- 5.Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE (2001) Estimates of the cancer risks from pediatric CT radiation are not merely theoretical: comment on “point/counterpoint: in x-ray computed tomography, technique factors should be selected appropriate to patient size. against the proposition. Med Phys 28:2387–2388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Medow JE, Iskandar BJ (2002) “Quick brain” MRI versus CT scan for evaluating shunted hydrocephalus. AANS/CNS Joint Section on Pediatric Neurological Surgery, ScottsdaleGoogle Scholar