Advertisement

Child's Nervous System

, Volume 24, Issue 8, pp 881–882 | Cite as

Pink and blue: the color of gender

  • Paolo FrassanitoEmail author
  • Benedetta Pettorini
Cover Picture

Assigning color to gender is mostly a twentieth-century trait. It should be noted that it is a practice limited most often to Western Europe and the Americas. It would also seem that the effect of color-coded gender differences (pink for girls, blue for boys) existed oppositely initially [10].

In fact, this reversal of what we consider “normal” was considered conventional, even in the early twentieth century. The debate of when and why pink and blue came into fashion to designate gender rages on, but almost every argument alludes to a passage in the novel Little Women, published in 1868: “Amy ties a pink bow and a blue bow on Meg’s twins Daisy and Demi, so people will know the difference between the girl and the boy.” This is said to be done in the “French style,” suggesting that it might have been possible in France that pink and blue were already gender-specific.

However, there is evidence that this practice was not always common or always done throughout much of Europe. In fact, in...

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander GM (2003) An evolutionary perspective on sex-typed toy preferences: pink, blue and the brain. Arch Sex Behav 32:7–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bachevalier J, Hagger C (1991) Sex differences in the development of learning abilities in primates. Psychoneuroendocrinology 16:177–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chiu SW, Gervan S, Fairbrother C et al (2006) Sex-dimorphic color preference in children with gender identity disorder: a comparison in clinical and community controls. Sex Roles 55:385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dobkins KR, Anderson CM (2002) Color-based motion processing is stronger in infants than in adults. Psychol Sci 13:76–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dominy NJ, Lucas PW (2001) Ecological importance of trichromatic vision to primates. Nature 410:363–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eals M, Silverman I (1994) The hunter–gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: proximate factors mediating the female advantage in location memory. Ethol Sociobiol 15:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Highley JD, Hopkins WD, Hirsch RM et al (1987) Preferences of female rhesus monkeys (macaca mulatta) for infantile coloration. Dev Psychobiol 20:7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hurlbert AC, Ling Y (2007) Biological compnents of sex differences in color preference. Curr Biol 17(16):623–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson MH (2001) The development and neural basis of face recognition: comment and speculation. Infant Child Dev 10:31–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paoletti JB (1997) The gendering of infants’ and toddlers’ clothing in America. In: Martine KA, Ames KL (eds) The material culture of gender, the gender of material culture. University Press of New England, Hanover, NHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paoletti JB, Kregloh C (1989) The children’s department. In: Kidwell CB, Steele V (eds) Men and women: dressing the part. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Regan BC, Julliot C, Simmen B et al (2001) Fruits, foliage, and the evolution of primate color vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356:229–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silverman I, Eals M (1992) Sex differences in spatial abilities: evolutionary theory and data. Oxford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pediatric NeurosurgeryCatholic UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations