Child's Nervous System

, Volume 23, Issue 12, pp 1357–1365 | Cite as

Cranial shape and size variation in human evolution: structural and functional perspectives

Original Paper

Abstract

A glimpse into modern paleoanthropology

In the last decades, paleoanthropology has been deeply modified, changing from a descriptive and historical science to a more quantitative and analytical discipline. The covariation of multiple traits is investigated to study the evolutionary changes of the underlying anatomical models, mostly through the introduction of digital biomedical imaging procedures and of computed geometrical analyses supported by multivariate statistics.

Functional craniology

The evolution of the human cranium is consequently considered in terms of functional and structural relationships between its components, largely influenced by the allometric variations associated with the increase in the relative cranial capacity. In the human genus, the changes in the face, base, and neurocranium are characterised by a mosaic variation, in which adaptations, secondary consequences, and stochastic factors concur to generate a set of anatomical possibilities and constraints.

Systemic perspectives to the evolution of the human cranial morphology

Concepts like morphological modularity, anatomical integration, and heterochrony represent key issues in the development of the current human evolutionary studies.

Keywords

Functional craniology Paleoanthropology Morphology Hominid evolution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Concezio di Rocco and Gianpiero Tamburrini for having invited me to the 2006 Consensus Conference on Pediatric Neurosurgery and Craniosynostosis, and to write this contribution. The research on functional craniology and endocranial anatomy is developed in collaboration with the Laboratory of Human Anatomy of the Instituto Universitario di Scienze Motorie of Roma (IUSM), directed by Maurizio Ripani, and supported by the IUSM grant 16142/01. This paper is partially supported by the Italian Institute of Anthropology (ISITA).

References

  1. 1.
    Ackermann RR (2002) Patterns of covariation in the hominoid craniofacial skeleton: implications for paleoanthropological models. J Hum Evol 43:167–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ackermann RR (2005) Ontogenetic integration of the hominoid face. J Hum Evol 48:175–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aldridge K, Marsh JL, Govier D, Richtsmeier JT (2002) Central nervous system phenotypes in craniosynostosis. J Anat 201:31–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anton SC (1989) Intentional cranial vault deformation and induced changes of the cranial base and face. Am J Phys Anthropol 79:253–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anton SC, Jaslow CR, Swartz SM (1992) Sutural complexity in artificially deformed human (Homo sapiens) crania. J Morphol 214:321–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bastir M, Rosas A (2005) Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face. Am J Phys Anthropol 128:26–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bastir M, Rosas A (2006) Correlated variation between the lateral basicranium and the face: a geometric morphometric study in different human groups. Arc Oral Biol 51:814–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bastir M, Rosas A, Kuroe K (2004) Petrosal orientation and mandibular ramus breadth: evidence for an integrated petroso-mandibular developmental unit. Am J Phys Anthropol 123:340–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bookstein F, Schafer K, Prossinger H, Seidler H, Fieder M, Stringer C, Weber GW, Arsuaga JL, Slice DE, Rohlf FJ, Recheis W, Mariam AJ, Marcus LF (1999) Comparing frontal cranial profiles in archaic and modern Homo by morphometric analysis. Anat Rec 257:217–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bookstein FL, Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Prossinger H, Schaefer K, Seidler H (2003) Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution. J Hum Evol 44:167–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breuker CJ, Debat V, Klingenberg CP (2006) Functional evo-devo. Trends Ecol Evol 21:488–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bruner E (2003) Fossil traces of the human thought: paleoneurology and the evolution of the genus Homo. Riv Antropol 81:29–56Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bruner E (2004) Geometric morphometrics and paleoneurology: brain shape evolution in the genus Homo. J Hum Evol 47:279–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bruner E, Manzi G (2005) CT-based description and phyletic evaluation of the archaic human calvarium from Ceprano, Italy. Anat Rec 285A:643–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bruner E, Manzi G (2006) Digital tools for the preservation of the human fossil heritage: Ceprano, Saccopastore, and other case studies. Hum Evol 21:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bruner E, Manzi G (2007) Landmark-based shape analysis of the archaic Homo calvarium from Ceprano (Italy). Am J Phys Anthropol 132:355–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bruner E, Manzi G, Arsuaga JL (2003) Encephalization and allometric trajectories in the genus Homo: evidence from the Neandertal and modern lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15335–15340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruner E, Saracino B, Passarello P, Ricci F, Tafuri M, Manzi G (2004) Midsagittal Cranial shape variation in the genus Homo by geometric morphometrics. Coll Antropol 28:99–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bruner E, Mantini S, Perna A, Maffei C, Manzi G (2005) Fractal dimension of the middle meningeal vessels: variation and evolution in Homo erectus, Neanderthals, and modern humans. Eur J Morphol 42:217–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Culham JC, Kanwisher NG (2001) Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:157–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Enlow DH (1966) A comparative study of facial growth in Homo and Macaca. Am J Phys Anthropol 24:293–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Enlow DH (1990) Facial growth. WB Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Falk D (1987) Hominid paleoneurology. Ann Rev Anthropol 16:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gould SJ (1966) Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol Rev 41:587–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gould SJ (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gunz P, Harvati K (2007) The Neanderthal “chignon”: variation, integration, and homology. J Hum Evol 52:262–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Henderson JH, Longaker MT, Carter DR (2004) Sutural bone deposition rate and strain magnitude during cranial development. Bone 34:271–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hjalgrim H, Lynnerup N, Liversage M, Rosenklint A (1995) Stereolithography: potential applications in anthropological studies. Am J Phys Anthropol 97:329–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Holloway RL (1978) The relevance of endocasts for studying primate brain evolution. In: Noback CR (ed) Sensory systems of primates. Plenum, New York, pp 181–200Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Holloway RL (1995) Toward a synthetic theory of human brain evolution. In: Changeaux JP, Chavaillon J (eds) Origins of the human brain. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 42–54Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holloway RL, Broadfield DC, Yuan MS (2004) Brain endocasts: the paleoneurological evidence. The human fossil record vol III. Wiley-Liss, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kapp-Simon KA, Speltz ML, Cunningham ML, Patel PK, Tomita T (2007) Neurodevelopment of children with single suture craniosynostosis: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 23:269–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kimbel WH (1984) Variation in the pattern of cranial venous sinuses and hominid phylogeny. Am J Phys Anthropol 63:243–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Klingenberg CP (1998) Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 73:79–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Klingenberg CP (2002) Morphometrics and the role of the phenotype in studies of the evolution of developmental mechanisms. Gene 287:3–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lieberman DE (2000) Ontogeny, homology, and phylogeny in the hominid craniofacial skeleton: the problem of the browridge. In: O’Higgins P, Cohn M (eds) Development, growth and evolution. Academic, London, pp 85–122Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lieberman DE, McBratney BM, Krovitz G (2002) The evolution and development of cranial form in Homo sapiens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:1134–1139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mafart B, Delingette H (2002) Three-dimensional imaging in paleoanthropology and prehistoric archaeology. BAR International Series 1049. Archaeopress, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mafart B, Guipert G, de Lumley MA, Subsol G (2004) Three-dimensional computer imaging of hominoid fossils: a new step in human evolution studies. Can Assoc Radiol J 55:264–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Manzi G (2003) ‘‘Epigenetic’’ cranial traits, Neandertals and the origin of Homo sapiens. Riv Antropol 81:57–68Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Manzi G (2004) Human evolution at the Matuyama–Brunhes boundary. Evol Anthropol 13:11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Manzi G, Vienna A, Hauser G (1996) Developmental stress and cranial hypostosis by epigenetic trait occurrence and distribution: an exploratory study on the Italian Neandertals. J Hum Evol 30:511–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Martínez-Maza C, Rosas A, García-Vargas S (2006) Bone paleohistology and human rvolution. J Anthropol Sci 84:33–52Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    McCarthy RC (2001) Anthropoid cranial base architecture and scaling relationships. J Hum Evol 40:41–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McCollum MA, Sherwood CC, Vinyard CJ, Lovejoy CO, Schachat F (2006) Of muscle-bound crania and human brain evolution: the story behind the MYH16 headlines. J Hum Evol 50:232–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Morriss-Kay GM, Wilkie AO (2005) Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: insights from human genetics and experimental studies. J Anat 207:637–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Moss ML, Young RW (1960) A functional approach to craniology. Am J Phys Anthropol 18:281–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    O’Laughlin V (1996) Comparative endocranial vascular changes due to craniosynostosis and artificial cranial deformation. Am J Phys Anthropol 101:369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Polanski JM, Franciscus RG (2006) Patterns of craniofacial integration in extant Homo, Pan, and Gorilla. Am J Phys Anthropol 13:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ponce de Leòn MS, Zollikofer CPE (2001) Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity. Nature 412:534–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Prossinger H, Seidler H, Wicke L, Weaver D, Recheis W, Stringer C, Muller GB (2003) Electronic removal of encrustation inside the Steinheim cranium reveals paranasal sinus features and deformations, and provides a revised endocraniial volume estimate. Anat Rec New Anat 273B:132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rak Y (1986) The Neanderthal: a new look at an old face. J Hum Evol 15:151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rakic P (2004) Genetic control of cortical convolutions. Science 303:1983–1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Recheis W, Weber GW, Schafer K, Prossinger H, Knapp R, Seidler H, zur Nedden D (1999) New methods and techniques in anthropology. Coll Antropol 23:495–509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Richtsmeier JT, Cheverud JM, Lele S (1992) Advances in anthropological morphometrics. Ann Rev Anthropol 21:283–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Richtsmeier JT, Deleon V, Lele SR (2002) The promise of geometric morphometrics. Yearb Phys Anthropol 45:63–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Richtsmeier JT, Aldridge K, de Leon VB, Panchal J, Kane AA, Marsh JL, Yan P, Cole TM (2006) Phenotypic integration of neurocranium and brain. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 306B:360–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rightmire GP (1998) Human evolution in the Middle Pleistocene: the role of Homo heidelbergensis. Evol Anthropol 6:218–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rightmire GP (2001) Patterns of hominid evolution and dispersal in the Middle Pleistocene. Quat Int 75:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rightmire GP (2004) Brain size and encephalization in early to mid-pleistocene Homo. Am J Phys Anthropol 124:109–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rilling JK (2006) Human and non-human primate brains: are they allometrically scaled versions of the same design? Evol Anthropol 15:65–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF (1993) A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol Evol 8:129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rosas A, Bastir M, Martinez-Maza C, Garcia-Tabernero A, Lalueza-Fox C (2006) Inquiries into Neanderthal craniofacial development and evolution: “accretion” versus “organismic” models. In: Harvati K, Harrison T (eds) Neanderthal revisited: new approaches and perpsectives. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 37–70Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ross CF, Ravosa MJ (1993) Basicranial flexion, relative brain size and facial kyphosis in nonhuman primates. Am J Phys Anthrop 91:305–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ross C, Henneberg M (1995) Basicranial flexion, relative brain size, and facial kyphosis in Homo sapiens and some fossil hominids. Am J Phys Anthrop 98:575–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ross C, Henneberg M, Ravosa MJ, Richard S (2004) Curvilinear geometric and phylogenetic modeling of basicranial flexion: is it adaptive is it constrained? J Hum Evol 46:185–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Schlosser G (2002) Modularity and the units of evolution. Theory Biosci 121:1–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Schoenemann PT, Gee J, Avants B, Holloway RL, Monge J, Lewis J (2007) Validation of plaster endocast morphology through 3D CT image analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 132:183–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Seidler H, Falk D, Stringer C, Wilfing H, Muller GB, Zur Nedden D, Weber GW, Reicheis W, Arsuaga JL (1997) A comparative study of stereolithographically modelled skulls of Petralona and Broken Hill: implications for future studies of Middle Pleistocene hominid evolution. J Hum Evol 33:691–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Semendeferi K, Damasio H (2000) The brain and its main anatomical subdivisions in living hominoids using magnetic resonance imaging. J Hum Evol 38:317–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Semendeferi K, Damasio H, Frank R, Van Hoesen GW (1997) The evolution of the frontal lobes: a volumetric analysis based on three-dimensional reconstructions of magnetic resonance scans of human and ape brains. J Hum Evol 32:375–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sergi S (1934) Ossicini fontanellari della regione del lambda nel cranio di Saccopastore e nei crani neandertaliani. Riv Antropol 30:101–112Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sergi S (1944) Craniometria e craniografia del primo paleantropo di Saccopastore. Ric Morfol 20–21:733–791Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sergi S (1948) L’uomo di Saccopastore. Paleontographia Italica XLII:25–164Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Shea BT (1992) Developmental perspective on size change and allometry in evolution. Evol Anthropol 1:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Shibata T, Ioannides AA (2001) Contribution of the human superior parietal lobule to spatial selection process: an MEG study. Brain Res 897:164–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Slice DE (2004) Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. Kluwer Academic-Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Spoor F, Zonneveld F (1995) Morphometry of the primate bony labyrinth: a new method based on high-resolution computed tomography. J Anat 186:271–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Spoor F, Jeffery N, Zonneveld F (2000) Using diagnostic radiology in human evolutionary studies. J Anat 197:61–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Stedman HH, Kozyak BW, Nelson A, Thesier DM, Su LT, Low DW, Bridges CR, Shrager JB, Minugh-Purvis N, Mitchell MA (2004) Myosin gene mutation correlates with anatomical changes in the human lineage. Nature 428:415–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Stout D, Chaminade T (2007) The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making. Neuropsychologia 45:1091–1100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Strait DS (1999) The scaling of basicranial flexion and length. J Hum Evol 37:701–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Strait DS (2001) Integration, phylogeny, and the hominid cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol 114:273–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Stringer CB (1994) Out of Africa. A personal history. In: Nitecki MH, Nitecki DV (eds) Origins of anatomically modern humans. Plenum, New York, pp 140–172Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Stringer C (2002) Modern human origins: progress and prospects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357:563–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tobias PV (1995) The brain of the first hominids. In: Changeaux JP, Chavaillon J (eds) Origins of the human brain. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 61–83Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Tobias PV (2001) Re-creating ancient hominid virtual endocasts by CT-scanning. Clin Anat 14:134–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Trinkaus E (2003) Neandertal faces were not long; modern human faces are short. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8142–8145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Wood B (2000) The history of the genus Homo. Hum Evol 15:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wood B, Collard M (1999) The human genus. Science 284:65–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Zelditch ML, Swidersky DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists. Elsevier, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León MS (2005) Virtual reconstruction: a primer in computer-assisted paleontology and biomedicine. Wiley-Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León MS (2006) Cranial growth models: heterochrony, heterotopy, and the kinematics of ontogeny. In: Harvati K, Harrison T (eds) Neanderthal revisited: new approaches and perpsectives. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 89–112Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de Leon MS, Martin RD, Stucki P (1995) Neanderthal computer skull. Nature 375:283–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León MS, Martin RD (1998) Computer assisted paleoanthropology. Evol Anthropol 6:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratorio di Anatomia FunzionaleIstituto Univesitario di Scienze MotorieRomaItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Italiano di Antropologia, Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell’UomoUniversità La SapienzaRomeItaly
  3. 3.Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH)BurgosEspaña

Personalised recommendations