Advertisement

Child's Nervous System

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 367–369 | Cite as

Observations at the craniocervical junction with simultaneous caudal traction of the spinal cord

  • R. Shane TubbsEmail author
  • Marios Loukas
  • Mohammadali M. Shoja
  • W. Jerry Oakes
Brief Communication

Abstract

Introduction

Some have opined that caudal traction of the spinal cord may result in caudal descent of the hindbrain.

Materials and methods

In fresh adult cadavers (n = 12; less than 6 h postmortem) with no CIM, distal tension (75 N) was applied to the conus medullaris with simultaneous observation of the cervical spinal cord, brainstem, and hindbrain and their relationship to the foramen magnum per occipital craniectomy and removal of the posterior arch of C1.

Results

After lumbar laminectomy in cadavers, caudal tension on the cord (conus medullaris) demonstrated negligible movement (less than 1 mm) of the caudal brain stem and cervical spinal cord. No movement of the cerebellar tonsils was identified. Moreover, after transection of the lumbar dural cul-de-sac and lumbar spinal dural nerve sleeves, distal traction produced only 2 to 3 mm of caudal descent of the brain stem and cervical spinal cord. Again, no movement of the cerebellar tonsils was visualized.

Conclusions

Our findings in a fresh cadaveric model suggest that it is unlikely that caudal fixation of the distal spinal cord results in inferior displacement of the cerebellar tonsils, and a resultant Chiari I malformation or that transection of the filum terminale may reverse tonsillar ectopia. In vivo animal studies are now necessary to verify our findings.

Keywords

Caudal traction Spinal cord Cerebellar tonsils 

References

  1. 1.
    Goldstein F, Kepes JJ (1966) The role of traction in the development of the Arnold-Chiari malformation. An experimental study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 25:654–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oakes WJ, Tubbs RS (2004) Chiari malformations. In: Winn HR (ed) Youmans neurological surgery, 5th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 3347–3361Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Royo-Salvador MB, Solé-Llenas J, Doménech JM, Gonzáalez-Adrio R (2005) Results of the section of the filum terminale in 20 patients with syringomyelia scoliosis and Chiari malformation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:515–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tubbs RS, Salter G, Grabb PA, Oakes WJ (2001) The denticulate ligament: anatomy and functional significance. J Neurosurg 94(Spine 2):271–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tubbs RS, Bui CJ, Rice WC, Loukas M, Naftel RP, Holcombe MP, Oakes WJ (2006) Critical analysis of the Chiari I malformation found in children with lipomyelomeningocele. J Neurosurg (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Shane Tubbs
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Marios Loukas
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mohammadali M. Shoja
    • 4
  • W. Jerry Oakes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cell Biology, Division of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Anatomical SciencesSt. George’s UniversitySt. George’sGrenada
  3. 3.Department of EducationHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  4. 4.Tabriz Medical UniversityTabrizIran
  5. 5.Pediatric NeurosurgeryChildren’s HospitalBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations