Functional outcome in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus
Quality of life was studied in 31 adult survivors of spina bifida, each with Verbal or Performance IQ score over 70.
Instruments measured physical and occupational function, cognitive/psychological function, somatic sensation, and social interaction in the context of the ability to live independently.
Domain group means except motor independence were in the average range (±1 standard deviation). Variability within the group with respect to physical phenotype (high spinal lesions were associated with poorer motor independence) and medical history [a greater number of shunt revisions (>4) were associated with poorer functional numeracy] was predictive of quality of life. Both spinal lesion level and number of shunt revisions influenced occupational status.
There was a relation between everyday mathematics, reading skills, and quality of life. The consequences of the physical, medical, and cognitive effects of spina bifida extend into young adulthood and have an impact on quality of life.
KeywordsSpina bifida Hydrocephalus Quality of life
- 1.Ager A (1990) The Life experiences checklist manual. NFER-NELSON Publishing Company Ltd., WindsorGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bruininks RH, Woodcock RW, Weatherman RF, Hill BK (1996) Scales of Independent Behavior–Revised. Riverside Publishing Company, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 5.Castree BJ, Walker JH (1981) The young adult with spina bifida. Br Med J 283:1040–1042Google Scholar
- 11.Evans DR, Cope MA (1989) Manual for the Quality of Life Questionnaire. Multi-Health Systems, Inc., TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fletcher JM, Dennis M, Northrup H (2000) Hydrocephalus. In: Yeates KM, Ris MD et al (eds) Pediatric neuropsychology: research, theory, and practice. The science and practice of neuropsychology. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 25–46Google Scholar
- 15.Harwood-Nash DCF, Fitz CR (1976) Neuroradiology in infants and children, vol 2. C.V. Mosby, St LouisGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hetherington R, Dennis M (1999) Motor function profile in children with early onset hydrocephalus. Dev Neuropsychol 15:25–52Google Scholar
- 21.Kaufman AS, Kaufman NL (1994) Functional academic skills test. American Guidance Service, Circle PinesGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kennedy SE, Martine SDG, Jelley JM, Walton B, Vlcek CK, Hassanein RS, Holmes GE (1998) Identification of medical and non-medical needs of adolescents and young adults with spina bifida and their families: a preliminary study. Child Health Care 27:47–61Google Scholar
- 27.Moos RH, Moos BS (1994) Family environment scale manual: development, applications, research, 3rd edn. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
- 30.Schipper H, Clinch JJ, Olweny CLM (1996) Quality of life studies: definitions and conceptual issues. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 11–23Google Scholar
- 32.SPSS Inc. (1999) SPSS base 10.0 for Windows user’s guide. SPSS Inc, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 34.van Allen MI, Alousek DK, Chernoff GF, Juriloff D, Harris M, McGillivray BC, Yong S-L, Langlois S, MacLeod PM, Chitayat D, Briedman JM, Wilson RD, McFadden D, Mantzar J, Ritchie S, Hall JG (1993) Evidence for multi-site closure of the neural tube in humans. Am J Med Genet 47:723–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Wechsler D (1981) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised. The Psychological Corporation, ClevelandGoogle Scholar