Efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy by diluted contrast digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic kidney disease
- 47 Downloads
This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy (EVT) by diluted contrast digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) often have CKD; thus, EVT carries a risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Reducing the amount of contrast medium is, therefore, important in these patients. We developed a novel EVT method using DSA with diluted contrast medium. DSA parameters were adjusted for diluted contrast angiography (1:10 dilution), and we defined this technique as low-concentration DSA (LC-DSA). We retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2] from June 2012 to November 2017 and classified them into two groups: EVT with diluted contrast (LC-DSA group, n = 63) and conventional EVT (control group, n = 59). Patients with aortoiliac lesions and those undergoing hemodialysis were excluded. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CIN as defined by an absolute increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.5 mg/dL or relative increase of ≥ 25% 2–5 days after the procedure. The secondary endpoints were worsening renal function (defined as an eGFR reduction of ≥ 25% compared with that before the procedure), the amount of contrast medium used for EVT, freedom from complications related to LC-DSA, and procedural success. The incidence of CIN was significantly lower in the LC-DSA group than control group (0.0% vs. 11.9%, respectively; P = 0.001). The absolute eGFR increase (4.25 ± 4.7 vs. 1.24 ± 6.9, respectively; P = 0.005) and creatinine decrease ( − 0.16 ± 0.2 vs. 0.007 ± 0.34, respectively; P = 0.0078) were greater in the LC-DSA group than control group. Less contrast medium was used in the LC-DSA group than control group (30.0 ± 14.6 vs. 117.9 ± 52.8 mL, respectively; P < 0.0001). There were no differences in the procedural success rate (100% vs. 96.6%, P = 0.23) or complications related to LC-DSA (0.0% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.48). Therefore, we concluded that EVT with diluted contrast DSA reduced the amount of contrast medium and incidence of CIN. This method is effective and safe for treating patients with CKD who have infrainguinal lesions.
KeywordsDiluted contrast medium Chronic kidney disease Endovascular therapy Contrast-induced nephropathy Digital subtraction angiography
We thank Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, from Edanz Group (https://www.edanzediting.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.
This research received no specific grants from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest regarding the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
- 2.Weisbord SD, Gallagher M, Jneid H, Garcia S, Cass A, Thwin SS, Conner TA, Chertow GM, Bhatt DL, Shunk K, Parikh CR, McFalls EO, Brophy M, Ferguson R, Wu H, Androsenko M, Myles J, Kaufman J, Palevsky PM; PRESERVE Trial Group (2018) Outcomes after angiography with sodium bicarbonate and acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med 378:603–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Fujihara M, Kawasaki D, Shintani Y, Fukunaga M, Nakama T, Koshida R, Higashimori A, Yokoi Y; CO2 Angiography Registry Investigators (2015) Endovascular therapy by CO2 angiography to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease: a prospective multicenter trial of CO2 angiography registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 85:870–877Google Scholar
- 8.Spargias K, Alexopoulos E, Kyrzopoulos S, Iokovis P, Greenwood DC, Manginas A, Voudris V, Pavlides G, Buller CE, Kremastinos D, Cokkinos DV (2004) Ascorbic acid prevents contrast-mediated nephropathy in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography or intervention. Circulation 110:2837–2842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Fung JW, Szeto CC, Chan WW, Kum LC, Chan AK, Wong JT, Wu EB, Yip GW, Chan JY, Yu CM, Woo KS, Sanderson JE (2004) Effect of N-acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast nephropathy in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency: a randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis 43:801–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hafiz AM, Jan MF, Mori N, Shaikh F, Wallach J, Bajwa T, Allaqaband S (2012) Prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with stable chronic renal disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary and peripheral interventions: randomized comparison of two preventive strategies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79:929–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Mariani J Jr, Guedes C, Soares P, Zalc S, Campos CM, Lopes AC, Spadaro AG, Perin MA, Filho AE, Takimura CK, Ribeiro E, Kalil-Filho R, Edelman ER, Serruys PW, Lemos PA (2014) Intravascular ultrasound guidance to minimize the use of iodine contrast in percutaneous coronary intervention: the MOZART (Minimizing cOntrast utilization With IVUS Guidance in coronary angioplasty) randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:1287–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Laskey WK, Jenkins C, Selzer F, Marroquin OC, Wilensky RL, Glaser R, Cohen HA, Holmes DR Jr; NHLBI Dynamic Registry Investigators (2007) Volume-to-creatinine ratio: a pharmacokinetically based risk factor for prediction of early creatine increase after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:584–590Google Scholar