Heart and Vessels

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 769–774

Mid-term results of small-sized St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic valves (21 mm or less) for small aortic annulus

  • Hiroki Mizoguchi
  • Masayuki Sakaki
  • Kazushige Inoue
  • Takashi Iwata
  • Keikou Tei
  • Takuya Miura
Original Article

Abstract

Prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) is always of concern when performing aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with a small aortic annulus. Although bioprosthetic AVR is preferred in patients older than 65 years, we have experienced cases in elderly patients with a small aortic annulus whereby we could not implant small-sized bioprosthetic valves. We have implanted St. Jude Medical Regent (SJMR) mechanical valves (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) as necessary, even in elderly patients with no aortic annulus enlargement. We investigated our experiences of AVR with SJMR mechanical valves of 21 mm or less in size. Between January 2006 and December 2009, 40 patients underwent AVR with SJMR mechanical valves ≤21 mm in size: 9 patients received 21-mm valves, 19 received 19-mm valves, and 12 received 17-mm valves. The mean age was 65.9 ± 9.5 years, and 25 patients (62.5 %) were 65 years or older. We evaluated the clinical outcome and the echocardiographic data for each valve size. There was no operative or hospital mortality. The mean duration of clinical follow-up was 31.2 ± 17.6 months. During follow-up, there were no hospitalizations due to heart failure. The cumulative valve-related event-free survival was 93 % at 33 months, and the cumulative hemorrhagic event-free survival was 93 % at 33 months and 84 % at 43 months, using the Kaplan–Meier method. At follow-up, the mean values of the measured effective orifice area (EOA) for the 21-, 19-, and 17-mm prostheses were 2.00 ± 0.22, 1.74 ± 0.37, and 1.25 ± 0.26 cm2, and the mean measured EOA index (EOAI) were 1.17 ± 0.12, 1.11 ± 0.21 and 0.90 ± 0.22 cm2/m2, respectively. A PPM (EOAI ≤0.85) was documented in 5 patients, all of whom had received a 17-mm SJMR valve. AVR with SJMR valves of 21 mm or less in size appears to show satisfactory clinical and hemodynamic results.

Keywords

Aortic valve replacement St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic valves Small aortic annulus Patient–prosthesis mismatch 

References

  1. 1.
    Rahimtoola SH (1978) The problem of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch. Circulation 58:20–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, De Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O’Gara PT, O’Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shanewise JS (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 114:e92–e98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Florath I, Albert A, Rosendahl U, Alexander T, Ennker IC, Ennker J (2005) Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves. Heart 91:1023–1029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doss M, Martens S, Wood JP, Aybek T, Kleine P, Wimmer Greinecker G, Moritz A (2003) Performance of stentless versus stented aortic valve bioprosthesis in the elderly patient: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:299–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sommers KE, David TE (1997) Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 63:1608–1612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Cartier PC, Métras J, Lemieux MD (2001) Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg 71:S265–S268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2006) Prosthesis–patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart 92:1022–1029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from American Society of Echocardiography’s guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Association of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18(12):1440–1463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walker DK, Brendzel AM, Stotten LN (1999) The new St. Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valve: laboratory measurements of hemodynamic performance. J Heart Valve Dis 8:687–696PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lund O, Nielsen SL, Arildsen H, Ilkjaer LB, Pilegaard HK (2000) Standard aortic St. Jude valves at 18 years: performance profile and determinants of outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1459–1465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chaux A, Gray RJ, Matloff JM, Feldman H, Sustaita H (1981) An appreciation of the new St. Jude valvular prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 81:202–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arom KV, Nicoloff DM, Kersten TE, Northrup WF III, Lindsay WG, Emery RW (1989) Ten years’ experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 47:831–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arom KV (1993) St. Jude Medical prosthesis: another 10 year follow up report. Ann Thorac Surg 56:403–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kratz JM, Sade RM, Crawford FA Jr, Crumbley AJ 3rd, Stroud MR (1994) The risk of small St. Jude aortic valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 57:1114–1119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fllis JT, Yoganathan AP (2000) A comparison of the hinge and the near-hinge flow fields of the St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus and Regent bileaflet mechanical heart valves. J Thorac Cardivasc Surg 119:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kennel WB, Castelli WP (1990) Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham heart study. N Engl J Med 322:1561–1566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2000) Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 36(4):1131–1141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vicchio M, Corte AD, De Santo LS, De Feo M, Caianiello G, Scardone M, Cotrufo M (2008) Prosthesis–patient mismatch in the elderly: survival, ventricular mass regression, and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg 86:1791–1798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moon MR, Pasque MK, Munfakh NA, Melby SJ, Lawton JS, Moazami N, Codd JE, Crabtree TD, Barner HB, Damiano RJ Jr (2006) Prosthesis–patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg 81(2):481–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Castro LJ, Arcidi JM Jr, Fisher AL, Gaudiani VA (2002) Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 74:31–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kulik A, Al-Saigh M, Chan V, Masters RG, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Mesana TG, Ruel M (2008) Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: is there a benefit? Ann Thorac Surg 85:94–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peterson MD, Borger MA, Feindel CM, David TE (2007) Aortic annular enlargement during aortic valve replacement: improving results with time. Ann Thorac Surg 83:2044–2049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kulik A (2010) Aortic root enlargement: worth the effort? Ann Thorac Surg 90(3):703–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Arom KV, Emery RW, Nicoloff DM, Petersen RJ (1996) Anticoagulant related complications in elderly patients with St. Jude mechanical valve prostheses. J Heart Valve Dis 5(5):505–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matsuyama K, Matsumoto M, Sugita T, Nishizawa J, Yoshida K, Tokuda Y, Matsumoto T (2002) Anticoagulant therapy in Japanese patients with mechanical mitral valves. Circ J 66(7):668–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sawaki S, Usui A, Abe T, Yoshikawa M, Akita T, Ueda Y (2006) Late mortality in elderly patients with mechanical heart valves. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 14(3):189–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroki Mizoguchi
    • 1
  • Masayuki Sakaki
    • 1
  • Kazushige Inoue
    • 1
  • Takashi Iwata
    • 1
  • Keikou Tei
    • 1
  • Takuya Miura
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryKansai Rosai HospitalAmagasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations