Long-term prognostic value of coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: 9-year follow-up results from SZEGED study
- 87 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
Reduction in coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) is a recognized feature in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We sought to assess the long-term prognostic value of CFR by pulsed-wave Doppler transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in HCM patients. The study comprised 20 patients with typical features of HCM. The patients were enrolled in 1999. All patients underwent a standard transthoracic echo-Doppler study to evaluate left ventricular function and a stress vasodilator TEE study to evaluate CFR. The success rate of follow-up was 18 out of 20 (90%). During a mean follow-up of 90 ± 24 months, four patients suffered cardiovascular death (2 sudden cardiac deaths and 2 strokes). The other seven patients underwent invasive procedures (coronary angiography, implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation) or showed cerebrovascular events. Using receiver operator characteristic analysis, CFR < 2.35 was a significant predictor for cardiovascular event-free survival (sensitivity 91%, specificity 71%, area under the curve 74%, P = 0.05). Multivariable regression analysis showed that only CFR (hazard ratio (HR) 4.21, P < 0.05) was an independent predictor of cardiovascular event-free survival. Despite the relatively small number of patients involved in the study, results could suggest that CFR should be considered as an independent predictor for future cardiovascular events in HCM patients. However, further studies with larger HCM patient populations are warranted.
Key words
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Follow-up Prediction Coronary flow velocity reserve Mortality MorbidityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Kofflard MJ, Michels M, Krams R, Kliffen M, Geleijnse ML, ten Cate FJ, Serruys PW (2007) Coronary flow reserve in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: relation with microvascular dysfunction and pathophysiological characteristics. Neth Heart J 15:209–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Memmola C, Iliceto S, Napoli VF, Cavallari D, Santoro G, Rizzon P (1994) Coronary flow dynamics and reserve assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 74:1147–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kim HK, Kim YJ, Sohn DW, Park YB, Choi YS (2004) Transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation of coronary flow reserve in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 94: 167–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Nemes A, Forster T, Ungi I, Nagy V, Vass A, Pálinkás A, Varga A, Csanády M (2005) The coronary flow velocity reserve measured by stress transoesophageal echocardiography evaluates the success of coronary interventions — results of a 5-year follow-up. Scand Cardiovasc J 39:286–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Nemes A, Forster T, Geleijnse ML, Kutyifa V, Neu K, Soliman OI, ten Cate FJ, Csanady M (2007) The additional prognostic power of diabetes mellitus on coronary flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 78:126–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Nemes A, Forster T, Geleijnse ML, Soliman OI, ten Cate FJ, Csanády M (2008) Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve and aortic distensibility indices in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Heart Vessels 23:167–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Nemes A, Forster T, Geleijnse ML, Soliman OI, ten Cate FJ, Csanády M (2008) Prognostic role of aortic atherosclerosis and coronary flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 131:45–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Rigo F, Cortigiani L, Pasanisi E, Richieri M, Cutaia V, Celestre M, Raviele A, Picano E (2006) The additional prognostic value of coronary flow reserve on left anterior descending artery in patients with negative stress echo by wall motion criteria. A transthoracic vasodilator stress echocardiography study. Am Heart J 151: 124–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Rigo F, Gherardi S, Galderisi M, Pratali L, Cortigiani L, Sicari R, Picano E (2006) The prognostic impact of coronary flow-reserve assessed by Doppler echocardiography in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 27:1319–1323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Rigo F, Sicari R, Gherardi S, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Cortigiani L, Picano E (2007) Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in medically treated patients with left anterior descending coronary disease with stenosis 51% to 75% in diameter. Am J Cardiol 100: 1527–1531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Rigo F, Sicari R, Gherardi S, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Cortigiani L, Picano E (2008) The additive prognostic value of wall motion abnormalities and coronary flow reserve during dipyridamole stress echo. Eur Heart J 29:79–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Tona F, Caforio AL, Montisci R, Gambino A, Angelini A, Ruscazio M, Toscano G, Feltrin G, Ramondo A, Gerosa G, Iliceto S (2006) Coronary flow velocity pattern and coronary flow reserve by contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography predict long-term outcome in heart transplantation. Circulation 114: I49–I55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Cortigiani L, Rigo F, Gherardi S, Sicari R, Galderisi M, Bovenzi F, Picano E (2007) Additional prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with negative dipyridamole stress echocardiography by wall motion criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1354–1361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Maron BJ, McKenna WJ, Danielson GK, Kappenberger LJ, Kuhn HJ, Seidman CE, Shah PM, Spencer WH 3rd, Spirito P, ten Cate FJ, Wigle ED (2003) Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. American College of Cardiology; Committee for Practice Guidelines. European Society of Cardiology. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1687–1713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Dunstan DW, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, De Courten MP, Cameron AJ, Sicree RA, Dwyer T, Colagiuri S, Jolley D, Knuiman M, Atkins R, Shaw JE (2002) The rising prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study. Diabetes Care 25:829–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Iliceto S, Marangelli V, Memmola C, Rizzon P (1991) Transesophageal Doppler echocardiography evaluation of coronary blood flow velocity in baseline conditions and during dipyridamole-induced coronary vasodilation. Circulation 83:61–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Fujii N, Tsuchihashi K, Sasao H, Fujii N, Tsuchihashi K, Sasao H, Eguchi M, Miurakami H, Hase M, Higashiura K, Yuda S, Hashimoto A, Miura T, Ura N, Shimamoto K (2008) Insulin resistance functionally limits endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilation in nondiabetic patients. Heart Vessels 23:9–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Suzuki K, Tsurumi Y, Fuda Y, Ishii Y, Takagi A, Hagiwara N, Kasanuki H (2007) Postprocedural resistance of the target lesion is a strong predictor of subsequent revascularization: assessment by a novel lesion-specific physiological parameter, the epicardial resistance index. Heart Vessels 22:139–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Soliman OI, Knaapen P, Geleijnse ML, Dijkmans PA, Anwar AM, Nemes A, Michels M, Vletter WB, Lammertsma AA, ten Cate FJ (2007) Assessment of intravascular and extravascular mechanisms of myocardial perfusion abnormalities in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by myocardial contrast echocardiography. Heart 93;1204–1212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Dimitrow PP, Krzanowski M, Bodzo W, Szczeklik A, Dubiel JS (1996) Coronary flow reserve and exercise capacity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart Vessels 11:160–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Yoshida K, Hozumi T, Takemoto Y, Sugioka K, Watanabe H, Muro T, Yoshiyama M, Takeuchi K, Yoshikawa J (2005) Impaired coronary circulation in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: noninvasive analysis by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Echocardiography 22:723–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Youn HJ, Lee JM, Park CS, Ihm SH, Cho EJ, Jung HO, Jeon HK, Oh YS, Chung WS, Kim JH, Choi KB, Hong SJ (2005) The impaired flow reserve capacity of penetrating intramyocardial coronary arteries in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:128–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Soliman OI, Geleijnse ML, Michels M, Dijkmans PA, Nemes A, van Dalen BM, Vletter WB, Serruys PW, ten Cate FJ (2008) Effect of successful alcohol septal ablation on microvascular function in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 101:1321–1327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Olivotto I, Cecchi F, Gistri R, Lorenzoni R, Chiriatti G, Girolami F, Torricelli F, Camici PG (2006) Relevance of coronary microvascular flow impairment to long-term remodeling and systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1043–1048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Lim HE, Shim WJ, Rhee H, Kim SM, Hwang GS, Kim YH, Seo HS, Oh DJ, Ro YM (2000) Assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison among adenosine, standard-dose dipyridamole, and high-dose dipyridamole. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 13:264–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar