Advertisement

Heart and Vessels

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 295–300 | Cite as

Carotid intima-media thickness in pre-and postmenopausal women with suspected coronary artery disease

  • Anna Kablak-ZiembickaEmail author
  • Tadeusz Przewlocki
  • Wieslawa Tracz
  • Piotr Pieniazek
  • Piotr Musialek
  • Andrzej Sokolowski
  • Rafal Drwila
  • Daniel Rzeznik
Original Article

Abstract

Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) is an early marker of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to evaluate CIMT value for CAD prediction in pre-and postmenopausal women referred for coronary angiography with angina-like symptoms and a positive result of the treadmill test. The study comprised 321 women referred for coronary angiography with symptoms suggesting CAD. Carotid intima-media thickness was measured in common, bifurcation, and internal carotid artery, and expressed as the mean maximum value. Coronary angiography showed coronary stenosis ≥50% in 211 (65.7%) women, including 27 with regular menses (47.3 ± 3.4 years) and 184 postmenopausal (65.8 ± 7.2 years). Normal coronary arteries were found in 110 women: 17 (47.3 ± 4.9 years) with regular menses and 93 postmenopausal (64.3 ± 6.5 years). The highest CIMT values were found in postmenopausal CAD women (1.360 ± 0.32 mm), as compared to premenopausal with CAD (1.178 ± 0.36 mm, P = 0.005), pre-(0.860 ± 0.23 mm, P < 0.001) and postmenopausal (1.022 ± 0.30 mm, P < 0.001) women without CAD. Carotid intima-media thickness (P < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.018), and myocardial infarction (P < 0.001), but not menopause itself or the number of years since menses cessation, were found to be independent CAD predictors. By receiver operating characteristic calculation, the mean maximum CIMT cut-off values discriminating CAD were lower in premenopausal (≥0.933 mm) than in postmenopausal women (≥1.075 mm; P < 0.05) resulting in similar sensitivity (85.2% and 82.6%) and specificity (70.6% and 69.9%). Carotid intima-media thickness is a strong CAD predictor in both pre-and postmenopausal women, in contrast to the menopausal status.

Key words

Premenopausal women Postmenopausal women Coronary artery disease Carotid intima-media thickness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sullivan AK, Holdright DR, Wright CA, Sparrow JL, Cunningham D, Fox KM (1994) Chest pain in women: clinical, investigative, and prognostic features. BMJ 308:883–886PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Curzen N, Patel D, Clarke D, Wright C, Mulcahy D, Sullivan A, Holdright D, Fox K (1996) Women with chest pain: is exercise testing worthwhile? Heart 76:156–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wong Y, Rodwell A, Dawkins S, Livesey SA, Simpson IA (2001) Sex differences in investigation results and treatment in subjects referred for investigation of chest pain. Heart 85:149–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Granér M, Varpula M, Kahri J, Salonen RM, Nyyssönen K, Nieminen MS, Taskinen MR, Syvänne M (2006) Association of carotid intima-media thickness with angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 97:624–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kablak-Ziembicka A, Przewlocki T, Tracz W, Stopa I, Pieniazek P, Musialek P, Zalewski J, Żmudka K (2007) Diagnostic value of carotid intima-media thickness in indicating multi-level atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 193:395–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mizia-Stec K, Gasior Z, Zahorska-Markiewicz B, Holecki M, Kumor P. (2006) Inflammatory markers in a 2-year follow-up of coronary artery disease. Heart Vessels 21:302–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis PH, Dawson JD, Riley WA, Lauer RM (2001) Carotid intimal-media thickness is related to cardiovascular risk factors measured from childhood through middle age. The Muscatine Study. Circulation 104:2815–2819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kablak-Ziembicka A, Przewlocki T, Tracz W, Pieniazek P, Musialek P, Sokołowski A (2005) Gender differences in carotid intima-media thickness in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 96:1217–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lieberman E, Gerhard M, Uehata A, Walsh BW, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Yeung AC, Creager MA (1994) Estrogen improves endothelium-dependent flow mediated vasodilation in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 121:936–941PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sutton-Tyrrell K, Lassila HC, Meilahn E, Bunker C, Matthews KA, Kuller LH (1998) Carotid atherosclerosis in premenopausal and postmenopausal women and its association with risk factors measured after menopause. Stroke 29:1116–1121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shepherd J (1998) Identifying patients at risk for coronary heart disease: treatment implications. Eur Heart J 19:1776–1783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lukaszewicz R, Lukaszewicz M, Ceremuzynski L (2006) Risk factors of atherosclerosis in premenopausal women with a sense of well-being. A pilot study. Kardiol Pol 64:573–580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Banasiak W, Pociupany R, Wilkins A, Ponikowski P (2007) Characteristics of patients with coronary artery disease managed on an outpatient basis in the population of Poland. Results of the multi-centre RECENT trial. Kardiol Pol 65:132–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Erzen B, Sabovic M, Sebestjen M, Poredos P (2007) Endothelial dysfunction, intima-media thickness, ankle-brachial pressure index, and pulse pressure in young post-myocardial infarction patients with various expressions of classical risk factors. Heart Vessels 22:215–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kieltyka L, Urbina EM, Tang R, Bond MG, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS (2003) Framingham risk score is related to carotid intima-media thickness in both white and black young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Atherosclerosis 170:125–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stensland-Bugge E, Bonaa KH, Joakimsen O, Njolstad I (2000) Sex differences in the relationship of risk factors to subclinical atherosclerosis measured 15 years later. The Tromso Study. Stroke 31:574–581Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lassila HC, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Matthews KA, Wolfson SK, Kuller HL (1997) Prevalence and determinants of carotid atherosclerosis in healthy postmenopausal women. Stroke 28:513–517PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stevenson JC, Crook D, Godsland IF (1993) Influence of age and menopause on serum lipids and lipoproteins in healthy women. Atherosclerosis 98:83–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Razay G, Heaton KW, Bolton DH (1992) Coronary heart disease risk factors in relation to menopause. Q J Med 85:307–308Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jansen J, Nilas L, Christiansen C (1990) Influence of menopause on serum lipids and lipoproteins. Maturitas 12:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tanriverdi H, Evrengul H, Mergen H, Acar C, Seleci D, Kuru O, Tanriverdi S, Kaftan A (2007) Early sign of atherosclerosis in slow coronary flow and relationship with angiotensin-converting enzyme l/D polymorphism. Heart Vessels 22:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stein JH, Fraizer MC, Aeschlimann SE, Nelson-Worel J, McBride PE, Douglas PS (2004) Vascular age: integrating carotid intimamedia thickness measurements with global coronary risk assessment. Clin Cardiol 27:388–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kullo IJ, Malik AR (2007) Arterial ultrasonography and tonometry as adjuncts to cardiovascular risk stratification. JACC 49:1413–1426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Howard G, Sharrett AR, Heiss G, Evans GW, Chambless LE, Riley WA, Burke GL (1993) Carotid artery intimal-medial thickness distribution in general populations as evaluated by B-mode ultrasound. ARIC investigators. Stroke 24:1297–1304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, Rosamond W, Szklo M, Sharrett AR, Clegg LX (1997) Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid artery wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987–1993. Am J Epidemiol 146:483–494PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Kablak-Ziembicka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tadeusz Przewlocki
    • 1
  • Wieslawa Tracz
    • 1
  • Piotr Pieniazek
    • 1
  • Piotr Musialek
    • 1
  • Andrzej Sokolowski
    • 2
  • Rafal Drwila
    • 1
  • Daniel Rzeznik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Collegium MedicumJagiellonian UniversityKrakowPoland
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsCracow University of EconomicsKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations