Parallel comparison of the northern winter stratospheric circulation in reanalysis and in CMIP5 models
- 128 Downloads
A parallel comparison is made of the circulation climatology and the leading oscillation mode of the northern winter stratosphere among six reanalysis products and 24 CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5) models. The results reveal that the NCEP/NCAR, NECP/DOE, ERA40, ERA-Interim and JRA25 reanalyses are quite consistent in describing the climatology and annual cycle of the stratospheric circulation. The 20CR reanalysis, however, exhibits a remarkable “cold pole” bias accompanied by a much stronger stratospheric polar jet, similar as in some CMIP5 models. Compared to the 1–2 month seasonal drift in most coupled general circulation models (GCMs), the seasonal cycle of the stratospheric zonal wind in most earth system models (ESMs) agrees very well with reanalysis. Similar to the climatology, the amplitude of Polar Vortex Oscillation (PVO) events also varies among CMIP5 models. The PVO amplitude in most GCMs is relatively weaker than in reanalysis, while that in most of the ESMs is more realistic. In relation to the “cold pole” bias and the weaker oscillation in some CMIP5 GCMs, the frequency of PVO events is significantly underestimated by CMIP5 GCMs; while in most ESMs, it is comparable to that in reanalysis. The PVO events in reanalysis (except in 20CR) mainly occur from mid-winter to early spring (January–March); but in some of the CMIP5 models, a 1–2 month delay exists, especially in most of the CMIP5 GCMs. The long-term trend of the PVO time series does not correspond to long-term changes in the frequency of PVO events in most of the CMIP5 models.
Key wordsCMIP5 northern winter stratospheric circulation Polar Vortex Oscillation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cai, M., and R. C. Ren, 2006: 40–70 day meridional propagation of global circulation anomalies. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06818, doi:10.1029/2005GL025024.Google Scholar
- Liu, Y. Z., R. C. Ren, and B. He, 2012: Comparison of SAMIL and BCC AGCM simulations of the polar vortex oscillation in the northern hemisphere winter. Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1191–1206. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Manzini, E., B. Steil, C. Bruhl, M. A. Giorgetta, and K. Kruger, 2003: A new interactive chemistry-climate model: 2. Sensitivity of the middle atmosphere to ozone depletion and increase in greenhouse gases and implications for recent stratospheric cooling. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4429, doi:10.1029/2002JD002977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ren, R. C., and M. Cai, 2007: Meridional and vertical out-of-phase relationships of temperature anomalies associated with the Northern Annular Mode variability. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L07704, doi:10.1029/2006GL028729.Google Scholar
- Rotstayn, L. D., M. A. Collier, M. R. Dix, F. Yan, H. B. Gordon, S. P. O’farrell, I. N. Smith, and J. Syktus, 2009: Improved simulation of Australian climate and ENSO-related rainfall variability in a global climate model with an interactive aerosol treatment. Int. J. Climatol., 30, 1067–1088.Google Scholar
- Wu, T. W., and Coauthors, 2013: Global carbon budgets simulated by the Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model for the last century. J. Geophys. Res., 118, 4326–4347, doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50320.Google Scholar