Advances in Atmospheric Sciences

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 201–216 | Cite as

A regional ensemble forecast system for stratiform precipitation events in northern China. Part I: A case study

  • Jiangshan Zhu (朱江山)
  • Fanyou Kong
  • Hengchi Lei (雷恒池)


A single-model, short-range, ensemble forecasting system (Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Regional Ensemble Forecast System, IAP REFS) with 15-km grid spacing, configured with multiple initial conditions, multiple lateral boundary conditions, and multiple physics parameterizations with 11 ensemble members, was developed using the Weather and Research Forecasting Model Advanced Research modeling system for prediction of stratiform precipitation events in northern China. This is the first part of a broader research project to develop a novel cloud-seeding operational system in a probabilistic framework. The ensemble perturbations were extracted from selected members of the National Center for Environmental Prediction Global Ensemble Forecasting System (NCEP GEFS) forecasts, and an inflation factor of two was applied to compensate for the lack of spread in the GEFS forecasts over the research region. Experiments on an actual stratiform precipitation case that occurred on 5–7 June 2009 in northern China were conducted to validate the ensemble system. The IAP REFS system had reasonably good performance in predicting the observed stratiform precipitation system. The perturbation inflation enlarged the ensemble spread and alleviated the underdispersion caused by parent forecasts. Centering the extracted perturbations on higher-resolution NCEP Global Forecast System forecasts resulted in less ensemble mean root-mean-square error and better accuracy in probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (PQPF). However, the perturbation inflation and recentering had less effect on near-surface-level variables compared to the mid-level variables, and its influence on PQPF resolution was limited as well.

Key words

short-range ensemble forecast rain enhancement operation probabilistic forecast 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J. L., 1996: A method for producing and evaluating probabilistic forecasts from ensemble model integrations. J. Climate, 9, 1518–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Du, J., S. L. Mullen, and F. Sanders, 1997: Short-range ensemble forecasting of quantitative precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 2427–2459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Du, J., G. DiMego, M. S. Tracton, and B. Zhou, 2003: NCEP short-range ensemble forecasting (SREF) system: Multi-IC, multi-model and multiphysics approach. Research activities in atmospheric and oceanic modelling, J. Côté, Ed., Report 33, CAS/JSC Working Group Numerical Experimentation (WGNE), WMO/TD-No. 1161, 5.09–5.10.Google Scholar
  4. Epstein, E. S., 1969: Stochastic dynamic prediction1. Tellus, 21(6), 739–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamill, T. M., 2001: Interpretation of rank histograms for verifying ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamill, T. M., and C. Snyder, 2000: A hybrid ensemble Kalman filter-3D variational analysis scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 2905–2919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamill, T. M., S. L. Mullen, C. Snyder, Z. Toth, and D. P. Baumhefner, 2000: Ensemble forecasting in the short to medium range: Report from a workshop. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 2653–2664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoffman, R., and E. Kalnay, 1983: Lagged average forecasting, an alternative to Monte Carlo forecasting. Tellus A, 35, 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hou, D., E. Kalnay, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2001: Objective verification of the SAMEX’98 ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Houtekamer, P., and H. Mitchell, 1998: Data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter technique. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 796–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kong, F., K. Droegemeier, N. Levit, and N. Branch, 2006: Multi-resolution ensemble forecasts of an observed tornadic thunderstorm system, Part I: Comparison of coarse and fine-grid ensembles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 807–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kong, F., K. Droegemeier, and N. Hickmon, 2007a: Multiresolution ensemble forecasts of an observed tornadic thunderstorm system. Part II: Storm-scale experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 759–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kong, F., and Coauthors, 2007b: Preliminary analysis on the real-time storm-scale ensemble forecasts produced as a part of the NOAA hazardous weather testbed 2007 spring experiment. Preprints, 22th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting and 18th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Park City, UT, 3B.2.Google Scholar
  14. Kong, F., and Coauthors, 2008: Real-time storm-scale ensemble forecast 2008 Spring Experiment. 24th Conf. Several Local Storms, Savannah, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Paper 12.3.Google Scholar
  15. Kong, F., and Coauthors, 2009: A real-time storm-scale ensemble forecast system: 2009 Spring Experiment. 23rd Conf. Weather Analysis and Forecasting / 19th Conf. Numerical Weather Prediction, Omaha, NB, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Paper 16A.3.Google Scholar
  16. Leith, C. E., 1974: Theoretical Skill of Monte Carlo Forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 102, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorenz, E. N., 1963: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Molteni, F., R. Buizza, T. Palmer, and T. Petroliagis, 1996: The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: Methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 73–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mu, M., W. Duan, and B. Wang, 2003: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation and its applications. Nonlinear Processes Geophyiscs, 10, 493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mullen, S., and D. Baumhefner, 1989: The impact of initial condition uncertainty on numerical simulations of large-scale explosive cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 2800–2821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mullen, S. L., J. Du, and F. Sanders, 1999: The dependence of ensemble dispersion on analysis-forecast systems: Implications to short-range ensemble forecasting of precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 1674–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murphy, A. H., 1973: A new vector partition of the probability score. J. Appl. Meteor., 12, 595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nutter, P., D. Stensrud, and M. Xue, 2004: Effects of coarsely resolved and temporally interpolated lateral boundary conditions on the dispersion of limitedarea ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2358–2377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shen, Y., M. Feng, H. Zhang, and F. Gao, 2010: Interpolation methods of China daily precipitation data. J. Appl. Meteor. Sci., 21, 279–286.Google Scholar
  25. Skamarock, W., J. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. Gill, D. Barker, W. Wang, and J. Powers, 2005: A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2. NCAR Technical Note TN-468+STR, 88pp.Google Scholar
  26. Stensrud, D. J., J.-W. Bao, and T. T. Warner, 2000: Using initial condition and model physics perturbations in short-range ensemble simulations of mesoscale Cconvective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 2077–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Swets, J. A., 1973: The relative operating characteristics in psychology. Science, 182, 990–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Toth, Z., and E. Kalnay, 1993: Ensemble forecasting at NMC: The generation of perturbations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74, 2317–2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Toth, Z., and E. Kalnay, 1997: Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 3297–3319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tracton, M., and E. Kalnay, 1993: Operational ensemble prediction at the National Meteorological Center: Practical aspects. Wea. Forecasting, 8, 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walser, A., D. Lüthi, and C. Schär, 2004: Predictability of precipitation in a cloud-resolving model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wei, M., Z. Toth, R. Wobus, and Y. Zhu, 2008: Initial perturbations based on the ensemble transform (ET) technique in the NCEP global operational forecast system. Tellus A, 60, 62–79.Google Scholar
  33. Xue, M., 2007: CAPS realtime storm-scale ensemble and high-resolution forecasts as part of the NOAA hazardous weather testbed 2007 spring experiment. 22nd Conf. Weather Analysis and Forecasting/18th Conf. Numerical Weather Prediction., Amer. Meteor. Soc., Park City, UT, Paper 3B.1.Google Scholar
  34. Xue, M., 2008: CAPS realtime storm-scale ensemble and high-resolution forecasts as part of the NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed 2008 Spring Experiment. Preprints, 24th Conf. on Severe Local Storm, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Savannah, GA, Paper 12.2.Google Scholar
  35. Xue, M., 2009: CAPS realtime storm-scale ensemble and high-resolution forecasts for the NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed 2009 Spring Experiment. 23rd Conf. Weather Analysis and Forecasting/19th Conf. Numerical Weather Prediction, Omaha, NB, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Paper 16A.Google Scholar
  36. Zhu, Y., and Z. Toth, 2008: Ensemble based probabilistic forecast verification. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Probability and Statistics, New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese National Committee for International Association of Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Science Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiangshan Zhu (朱江山)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fanyou Kong
    • 3
  • Hengchi Lei (雷恒池)
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Graduate University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Center for Analysis and Prediction of StormsUniversity of OklahomaOklahomaUSA

Personalised recommendations