Comparison of COSMIC radio occultation refractivity profiles with radiosonde measurements
- First Online:
- 85 Downloads
In recent years, radio occultation (RO) technology making use of global positioning system (GPS) signals has been exploited to obtain profiles of atmospheric parameters in the neutral atmosphere. In this paper, the RO refractivity profiles obtained from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC) mission are statistically compared with the observations of 38 radiosonde stations provided by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology during the period from 15 July 2006 through 15 July 2007. Different collocation criteria are compared at first, and COSMIC RO soundings that occur within 3 hours and 300 km of radiosonde measurements are used for the final statistical comparison. The overall results show that the agreements between the COSMIC refractivity profiles and the radiosonde soundings from the 38 stations are very good at 0–30 km altitude, with mean absolute relative refractivity deviations of less than 0.5%. Latitudinal comparisons indicate that there are negative refractivity deviations in the lower troposphere over the low latitude and middle latitude regions and large standard deviations exist in the lower troposphere of low latitude regions, which can reach up to ≈6%. The comparisons of COSMIC RO refractivity profiles and radiosonde observations for 3 polar stations in four different seasons indicate that the accuracy of GPS RO profiles is better in the Austral summer and autumn than in the Austral spring and winter during the year from September 2006 to August 2007.
Key wordsGPS radio occultation radiosonde soundings refractivity profiles statistical comparison
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Hajj, G. A., and Coauthors, 2004: CHAMP and SAC-C atmospheric occultation results and intercomparisons. J. Geophys. Res., 109(D6), doi: 10.1029/2003JD003909.Google Scholar
- Healy, S. B., A. M. Jupp, and C. Marquardt, 2005: Forecast impact experiment with GPS radio occultation measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020806.Google Scholar
- Kuo, Y.-H., W. S. Schreiner, J. Wang, D. L. Rossiter, and Y. Zhang, 2005: Comparison of GPS radio occultation soundings with radiosondes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, doi: 10.1029/2004GL021443.Google Scholar
- Nedoluha, G. E., J. Alfred, C. M. Benson, K. W. Hoppel, J. Wickert, and G. Koenig-Langlo, 2007: A comparison of radiosonde and GPS radio occultation measurements with meteorological temperature analyses in the Antarctic vortex, 1998–2004. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16304, doi: 10.1029/2007JD008928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- von Engeln, A., G. Nedoluha, G. Kirchengast, and S. Bhler, 2003: One-dimensional variational (1-D Var) retrieval of temperature, water vapor, and a reference pressure from radio occultation measurements: A sensitivity analysis. J. Geophys. Res., 108(D11), 4337, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, K., and S. Lin, 2007: First continuous GPS soundings of temperature structure over Antarctic winter from FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC constellation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34(12), doi: 10.1029/2007GL030159.Google Scholar
- Wickert, J., 2004: Comparison of vertical refractivity and temperature profiles from CHAMP with radiosonde measurements. Scientific Report 04-09, Danish Meteorological Institute, 35pp.Google Scholar
- Yunck, T. P., G. F. Lindal and C. H. Liu, 1988: The Role of GPS in Precise Earth Observation. Proc. IEEE Position Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS88), Nov. 29–Dec. 2, 1988, Orlando, FL, 251–258.Google Scholar