Advances in Atmospheric Sciences

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 539–554 | Cite as

Intercomparison of precipitation simulated by regional climate models over East Asia in 1997 and 1998

  • Dong-Kyou LeeEmail author
  • William J. GutowskiJr.
  • Hyun-Suk Kang
  • Chun-Ji Kim


Regional climate simulations in Asia from May 1997 to August 1998 were performed using the Seoul National University regional climate model (SNURCM) and Iowa State University regional climate model (ALT.MM5/LSM), which were developed by coupling the NCAR/Land Surface Model (LSM) and the Mesoscale Model (MM5). However, for physical processes of precipitation, the SNURCM used the Grell scheme for the convective parameterization scheme (CPS) and the simple ice scheme for the explicit moisture scheme (EMS), while the ALT.MM5/LSM used the Betts-Miller scheme for CPS and the mixed phase scheme for EMS.

The simulated precipitation patterns and amounts over East Asia for the extreme climatic summer in 1997 (relative drought conditions) and 1998 (relative flood conditions) were especially focused upon. The ALT.MM5/LSM simulated more precipitation than was observed in 1997 due to more moisture and cloud water in the lower levels, despite weak upward motion. In the SNURCM, strong upward motion resulted in more precipitation than that was observed in 1998, with more moisture and cloud water in the middle levels. In the ALT.MM5/LSM, weak upward motion, unchanged moisture in the lower troposphere, and the decrease in latent heat flux at the surface increased convective precipitation only by 3% for the 1998 summer event. In the SNURCM, strong upward motion, the increase in moisture in the lower troposphere, and the increase in latent heat flux at the surface increased convective precipitation by 48% for the summer of 1998. The main differences between both simulations were moisture availability and horizontal momentum transport in the lower troposphere, which were also strongly influenced by large-scale forcing.

Key words

regional climate simulation summer precipitation variability extreme climatic event physical process 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arakawa, A., and W. H. Schubert, 1974: Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment. Part I. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 674–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, G. D., and M. S. Halpert, 1998: Climate assessment for 1997. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79, 1014–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, G. D., M. S. Halpert, V. E. Kousky, M. E. Gelman, C. F. Ropelewski, A. V. Douglas, and R. C. Schnell, 1999: Climate assessment for 1998. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 1040–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Betts, A. K., 1986: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part I: Observational and theoretical basis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 677–692.Google Scholar
  5. Betts, A. K., and M. J. Miller, 1986: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: Single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX,ATEX, and arctic air-mass data sets. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 693–709.Google Scholar
  6. Bonan, G. B., 1996: A Land Surface Model (LSM version 1.0) for Ecological, Hydrological, and Atmospheric Studies: Technical Description and Users’ Guide. NCAR/TN-417+STR, NCAR Tech. Note, 150pp.Google Scholar
  7. Briegleb, B. P., 1992: Delta-Eddington approximation for solar radiation in the NCAR community climate model. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7603–7612.Google Scholar
  8. Cess, R. D., M. Zhang, B. A. Wielicki, D. F. Young, X-L. Zhou, and Y. Nikitenko, 2001: The influence of the 1998 El Niño upon cloud-radiative forcing over the Pacific warm pool. J. Climate, 14, 2129–2137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, M., R. E. Dickinson, X. Zeng, and A. N. Hahmann, 1996: Comparison of precicpitation observed over the continental United States to that simulated by a climate model. J. Climate, 9, 2233–2249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CPC, 1997: Climate Diagnostics Bulletin, September 1997. NOAA/National Weather Service, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, MD, 80pp.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, H. C., and R. E. Turner, 1977: Updating prediction models by dynamical relaxation: An examination of the technique. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 103, 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dickinson, R. E., R.M. Errico, F. Giorgi, and G. T. Bates, 1989: A regional climate for the western United States. Climatic Change, 15, 383–342.Google Scholar
  13. Ding, Y., and Y. Liu, 2001: Onset and the evolution of the summer monsoon over the South China Sea during SCSMEX field experiment in 1998. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 79, 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional Model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3077–3107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott, J. R., S. P. Jewson, and R. T. Sutton, 2001: The impact of the 1997/98 El Niño event on the Athlantic Ocean. J. Climate, 14, 1069–2121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fu, C. B., and Coauthors, 2005: Regional climate Model Intercomparison Project for Asia (RMIP). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giorgi, F., 1990: Simulation of regional climate using a limited area model nested in a general ciculation model. J. Climate, 3, 941–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giorgi, F., and C. Shields, 1999: Tests of precipitation parameterizations available in the latest version of the NCAR Regional Climate Model (RegCM) over the continental United States. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6353–6376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giorgi, F., M. R. Marinucci, G. T. Bates, and G. De Canio, 1993: Development of a second generation regional climate model (RegCM2). Part II: Convective processes and assimilation of lateral boundary conditions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 2814–2832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giorgi, F., L. O. Mearns, C. Shields, and L. Mayer, 1996: A regional model study of the importance of local versus remote controls of 1998 drought and 1993 flood over the central United States. J. Climate, 9, 1150–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giorgi, F., Y. Huang, K. Nishizawa, and C. Fu, 1999: A seasonal cycle simulation over eastern Asia and its sensitivity to radiative transfer and surface processes. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6403–6423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grell, G. A., 1993: Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 764–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1994: A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR/TN-398+STR, NCAR Technical Note, CO, USA, 122pp.Google Scholar
  24. Hong, S.-Y., and H.-L. Pan, 1996: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium range forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2322–2339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang, H.-S., D.-H. Cha, and D.-K. Lee, 2005: Evaluation of the mesoscale model/land surface model (MM5/LSM) coupled model for East Asian summer monsoon simulations. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D10105, doi:10.1029/2004JD005266.Google Scholar
  26. Kumar, A., and W. Wang, 2001: The Sustained North American Warming of 1997 and 1998. J. Climate, 14, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lau, K. M., and H. Weng, 2001: Coherent modes of global SST and summer rainfall over China: An assessment of the regional impacts of the 1997–98 El Niño. J. Climate, 14, 1294–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lau, K. M., and H.-T. Wu, 1999: Assessment of the impacts of the 1997–98 El Niño on the Asian-Australia monsoon. Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1747–1750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lau, K. M., and Coauthors, 2000: A report of the field operations and early results of the South China Sea Monsoon Experiment (SCSMEX). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 1261–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, D.-K., and H.-S. Kang, 1999: Coupling of the NCAR/LSM into the MM5 and its application for the East Asian summer monsoon. Preprints, the 9th PSU/NCAR mesoscale model users’ workshop, 23–25, June 1999, Boulder, CO., USA, 198–201.Google Scholar
  31. Leung, L. R., S. J. Ghan, Z.-C. Zhao, Y. Luo, W.-C. Wang, and H.-L. Wei, 1999: Intercomparison of regional climate simulations of the 1991 summer monsoon in eastern Asia. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6425–6454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu, Y., F. Giorgi, and W. M. Washington, 1994: Simulation of summer monsoon climate over east Asia with an NCAR regional climate model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 2331–2348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2001: A mesoscale modeling study of the 1996 Saguenay flood. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 1419–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Qian, J.-H., F. Giorgi, and M. S. Fox-Rabinovits, 1999: Regional stretched grid generation and its application to the NCAR RegCM. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6501–6513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reisner, J., R. T. Bruintjes, and R. M. Rasmussen, 1993: Preliminary comparisons between MM5 NCAR/Penn State model generated icing forecasts and observations. Preprints, Fifth Int. Conf. on Aviation Weather Systems, Vienna, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 65–69.Google Scholar
  36. Reisner, J., R. M. Rasmussen, and R. Bruintjes, 1998: Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 1071–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schubert, S. D., and M. L. Wu, 2001: Predictability of the 1997 and 1998 south Asian summer monsoon low-level winds. J. Climate, 14, 3173–3191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, W., and N. L. Seaman, 1997: A comparison study of convective parameterization schemes in a mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 252–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang, Y., O. L. Sen, and B. Wang, 2003: A highly resolved regional climate model (IPRC-RegCM) and its simulation of the 1998 severe precipitation event over China. Part I: Model description and verification of simulation. J. Climate, 16, 1721–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong-Kyou Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • William J. GutowskiJr.
    • 2
  • Hyun-Suk Kang
    • 1
  • Chun-Ji Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Geological and Atmospheric SciencesIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations