Retrieval of single-Doppler radar wind field by nonlinear approximation
- 58 Downloads
Abstract
The methods employed in recent years to retrieve vector wind information from single-Doppler radar observation are reviewed briefly. These methods are based on a linearity hypothesis for the wind field, so the retrieved wind field is sometimes negatively affected by the non-linearity of wind. This paper proposes a new method based on a non-linear approximation technique. This method, which relies on the piecewise smooth property of the wind field and makes full use of the radar velocity data, is applied to two cases of the Huaihe River Basin Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (HUBEX) in 1998. Checked against the wind field observed by dual-Doppler radar, the retrieved wind field by the method presented in this paper yields a relatively accurate horizontal vector wind field with high resolution, as well as a reasonable estimate of the magnitude of vertical velocity.
Key words
nonlinear approximation piecewise smooth wind field basis functionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bai J., Zhou X. B., Wang L. K., and Tao Z. Y., 2001: Error analysis of Doppler radar expanded VAD technique. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 37(1), 48–54.Google Scholar
- Bai J., and Tao Z. Y., 2000: The pre-processing of Doppler radar wind retrieval VAP technique. Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology, 11(1), 21–26. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Bluestin, H., and D. Hazen, 1989: Doppler radar analysis of a tropical cyclone over land: Hurricane Alicia 1983 in Oklahoma. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 2594–2611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boccippio, D. J. 1995: A diagnostic analysis of the VVP single-Doppler retrieval technique. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 12, 230–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Browning, K. A., and R. Welxler, 1968: The determination of kinematic properties of a wind field using Doppler radar. J. Appl. Meteor., 7, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chapelle, O., P. Haffner, and V. N. Vapnik, 1999: Support vector machines for histogram-based image classification. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 10, 1055–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, A., and J. d’Ales, 1997: Nonlinear approximation of random functions. SIAM J. Appl. Math, 57, 518–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coifman, R. B., Y. Meyer, and V. M. Wickerhauser, 1992: Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38(2), 713–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evgeniou T., 2000: Statistical learning theory: A primer. International Journal of Computer Vision, 38(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Girosi, F., 1998: An equivalence between sparse approximation and support vector machines, 1998: Neural Computation, 10(6): 1455–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gorodnitsky, I. F., and B. D. Rao, 1997: Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: A re-weighted minimum norm algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 45, 600–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnston, B. W., J. D. Marwitz, and R. Carbone, 1990: Single Doppler radar analysis of banded precipitation structures. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 7(6), 866–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tsuboki, K., B. Geng, and T. Takeda, 2000: Dual Doppler radar analysis of a squall line observed over the China continent during the HUBEX intensive field observation, International GAME/HUBEX Workshop, 12–14 September, Sapporo JAPAN, 69–75.Google Scholar
- Klimowski, B. A., and J. D. Marwitz, 1990: Single Doppler analysis of a severe squall line. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Kananaskis, Alberta. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 252–255.Google Scholar
- Lhermitte, R. M., and D. Atlas, 1961: Precipitation motion by pulse Doppler. Proa, Ninth Weather Radar Conf., Boston. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 218–223.Google Scholar
- Liou, Y. C., Gal-Chen, and D. K. Lilly, 1991: Retrieval of wind temperature and pressure from single-Doppler radar and a numerical model, 25th International Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Paris. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 151–154.Google Scholar
- Liu S. Y., and Z. Y. Tao, 1999: The Retrieval of the horizontal divergence field from a single-Doppler radar velocity field. Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology, 10(1), 41–48. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Marwitz, J. D., and R. Carbone, 1990: Single Doppler analysis of banded precipitation structures. J. Atoms. Oceanic Technol., 7, 866–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marwitz, J. D., 1990: A case study of heavy snowfall in Oklahoma. Preprints, Fourth Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Boulder. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 61–62.Google Scholar
- Matejka, T., and R. C. Srivastava, 1991: An improved version of the extended velocity-azimuth display technique for analyzing single-Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Oceanic. Technol., 8, 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ogura, Y., and M. T. Liou, 1980: The structure of a midlatitude squall line: A case study. J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peace, R. L., R. A. Brown, and H. G. Camnitz, 1969: Horizontal motion field observations with a single pulse Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 1096–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Qiu, C. J., and Q. Xu, 1992: A simple adjoint method of wind analysis for single-Doppler data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 9, 588–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scialom, G., and J. Testud, 1986: Retrieval of horizontal wind field and mesoscale vertical vorticity in strati-form precipitation by conical scanning with Doppler radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 3, 696–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shusse, Y., H. Minda, B. Geng, K. Tsuboki, and T. Takeda, 2000: Three-dimensional airflow structure of deeply developed long-lived cumulonimbus cloud in the atmospheric situation of weak vertical wind shear, International GAME/HUBEX Workshop, 12–14 September, Sapporo JAPAN, 76–77.Google Scholar
- Smythe, G. R., and D. S. Zrnic, 1983: Correlation analysis of Doppler radar data and retrieval of the horizontal wind. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Srivastava, R. C, T. J. Matejka, and T. J. Lorello, 1986: Doppler radar study of the trailing anvil region associated with a squall line. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 356–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sun, J., D. W. Flicker, and D. K. Lilly, 1991: Recovery of three-dimensional wind and temperature fields from single-Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 876–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Suykens, J. A. K., L. Lukas, and J. Vandewalle, 1999: Sparse approximation using least squares Support vector machine. Internal Report 99–84, ESAT-SISTA, K. U. Leuven (Leuven, Belgium) Accepted for publication in Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS 2000), Geneva, Switzerland, May 2000, 757–760.Google Scholar
- Takeda, T., Y. Shusse, H. Minda, Y. Wakatsuki, B. Geng, and K. Tsuboki, 1999: Three-dimensional structure of deeply developed long-lived cumulonimbus cloud in the HUBEX-IFO, Workshop on Meso-scale Systems in Meiyu/Baiu Front and Hydrological Cycle, 3–9 November, Xi’an, China, 79–80.Google Scholar
- Tao Z. T., 1992: The VAP method to retrieve the wind vectors field based on single-Doppler velocity field. Acta Meteor. Sinica, 50, 81 90. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Tikhonov, A. N., and V. Y. Arsenin, 1977: Solutions of Ill-posed Problems. W. H. Winston. Washington, D. C: 224pp.Google Scholar
- Tuttle, J. D., and G. B. Foote, 1990: Determination of the boundary layer airflow from a single-Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 7, 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vapnik, V. N., 1995: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York., 188pp.Google Scholar
- Vapnik, V. N., 1998a: Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New York, 732pp.Google Scholar
- Vapnik, V. N., 1998b: The support vector method of function estimation. Nonlinear Modeling: Advanced Blackbox Techniques, J. A. K. Suykens, and J. Vandewalle, Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 55–85.Google Scholar
- Vapnik, V. N., and A.Y. Chervonenkis, 1971: On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 17(2), 264–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vapnik, V. N., and S. Mukherjee, 2000: Support vector method for multivariate density estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12, S. A. Solla, T. K. Leen, and K. -R. Muller, Eds., MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, 659–665.Google Scholar
- Waldteufel, P., and H. Corbin, 1979: On the analysis of single-Doppler radar data. J. Appl. Meteor., 18, 532–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wei M., Dang R. Q., Ge W. Z., and T. Takeda, 1998: Retrieval of single-Doppler radar wind with variational assimilation method, Part I: Objective selection of functional weightings factors. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 15, 533–568.Google Scholar
- Xin, L., and G. W. Reuter, 1998: VVP technique applied to an Alberta storm. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 15, 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xu Q., and C. J. Qiu, 1994: Simple adjoint methods for single-Doppler wind analysis with strong constraint of mass conservation. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 11, 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xu, Q., C. J. Qiu, H. D. Gu, and J. X. Yu, 1995: Simple adjoint retrieval of microburst winds from single-Doppler radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 1822–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar