Advertisement

Open field inoculation with PGPR as a strategy to manage fertilization of ancient Triticum genotypes

  • Giancarlo Pagnani
  • Angelica Galieni
  • Fabio StagnariEmail author
  • Marika Pellegrini
  • Maddalena Del Gallo
  • Michele Pisante
Original Paper
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Ancient wheats are characterized by high nutritional value, low nitrogen requirements, and good adaptability which make them particularly suitable for marginal areas or low-input agricultural systems. Among environmental-friendly fertilizers, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria represent a promising tool thanks to their ability to colonize soil and plant roots. In this study, a consortium of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria was applied on three ancient wheat varieties (durum wheat: Senatore Cappelli, Saragolla; emmer: Molisano). Colonization and survival of bacteria in wheat seedling roots were investigated on in vitro cultures. The effects of the bacteria on crop growth, yield, and grain protein accumulation were studied in a 2-year open field experiment (split-plot arranged on a randomized block). Three different fertilization strategies were compared: (i) one bacterial application at sowing, (ii) two bacterial applications at sowing and tillering stages, (iii) zero bacterial application. Scanning electron microscope imaging revealed the ability of the bacteria to colonize effectively seedling roots thanks to biofilm formation on root surfaces. In both years, double bacterial application positively affected plant physiology, growth, and yield. Plants with double bacterial application showed highest physiological traits, and resulting enhanced yield and grain protein contents. The applied bacterial consortium positively performs on ancient wheats, even if the magnitude of its success depends on timing and rate of application.

Keywords

Ancient wheat PGPR Bio-fertilization Wheat quality SEM 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article is dedicated to the memory of Yoav Bashan who has spent, among his many activities, so much for the research and use of PGPR.

We gratefully acknowledge Pasquale Codianni of CREA - Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (Foggia) - and Michelina Colonna of ARSARP (Campobasso) for providing the ancient wheat species. We also wish to thank Sara D’Egidio for the valuable contribution in quality assessment, and Maria Di Giammatteo and Lorenzo Arrizza (Microscopy Center, University of L’Aquila) for their support with SEM.

Supplementary material

374_2019_1407_MOESM1_ESM.docx (292 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 292 kb)

References

  1. Akbari P, Ghalavand A, Sanavy AM, Alikhani MA (2011) The effect of biofertilizers, nitrogen fertilizer and farmyard manure on grain yield and seed quality of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). J Agric Technol 7:173–184Google Scholar
  2. Altaf MM, Ahmad I (2016) Biofilm formation on plant surfaces by rhizobacteria: impact on plant growth and ecological significance. In: Gupta VK, Sharma GD, Tuohy MG, Gaur R (eds) The handbook of microbial bioresources. CAB International, Wellingford, pp 81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badawi FSF, Biomy AMM, Desoky AH (2011) Peanut plant growth and yield as influenced by co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium and some rhizo-microorganisms under sandy loam soil conditions. Ann Agric Sci 56:17–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2011.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balsanelli E, De Baura VA, De Oliveira PF, De Souza EM, Monteiro RA (2014) Exopolysaccharide biosynthesis enables mature biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces by Herbaspirillum seropedicae. PLoS One 9:e110392.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110392 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bar T, Okon Y (1993) Tryptophan conversion to indole-3-acetic acid via indole-3-acetamide in Azospirillum brasilense Sp 7. Can J Microbiol 39:81–86.  https://doi.org/10.1139/m93-011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basaglia M, Casella S, Peruch U, Poggiolini S, Vamerali T, Mosca G, Vanderleyden J, De Troch P, Nuti MP (2003) Field release of genetically marked Azospirillum brasilense in association with Sorghum bicolor L. Plant Soil 256:281–290.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026198522123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bashan Y, de-Bashan LE (2010) How the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum promotes plant growth — a critical assessment. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy. Academic, Cambridge, pp 77–136Google Scholar
  8. Bashan Y, Levanony H, Whitmoyer RE (1991) Root surface colonization of non-cereal crop plants by pleomorphic Azospirillum brasilense cd. J Gen Microbiol 137:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bashan Y, Bustillos JJ, Leyva LA, Hernandez JP, Bacilio M (2006) Increase in auxiliary photoprotective photosynthetic pigments in wheat seedlings induced by Azospirillum brasilense. Biol Fertil Soils 42:279–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-005-0025-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bashan Y, de-Bashan L, Prabhu SR, Hernandez JP (2014) Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (1998–2013). Plant Soil 378:1–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1956-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bashan Y, Huang P, Kloepper JW, de-Bashan L (2017) A proposal for avoiding fresh-weight measurements when reporting the effect of plant growth-promoting (rhizo)bacteria on growth promotion of plants. Biol Fertil Soils 53:1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1153-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beauregard PB, Chai Y, Vlamakis H, Losick R, Kolter R (2013) Bacillus subtilis biofilm induction by plant polysaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:E1621–E1630.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218984110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Behl RK, Ruppel S, Kothe E, Narula N (2012) Wheat x Azotobacter x VA Mycorrhiza interactions towards plant nutrition and growth – a review. J Appl Bot Food Qual 109:95–109Google Scholar
  14. Bergottini VM, Otegui MB, Sosa DA, Zapata PD, Mulot M, Rebord M, Zopfi J, Wiss F, Benrey B, Junier P (2015) Bio-inoculation of yerba mate seedlings (Ilex paraguariensis St. Hill.) with native plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: a sustainable alternative to improve crop yield. Biol Fertil Soils 51:749–755.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-015-1012-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bevivino A, Tabacchioni S, Chiarini L, Carusi MV, Del Gallo M, Visca P (1994) Phenotypic comparison between rhizosphere and clinical isolates of Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiology 140:1069–1077.  https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-140-5-1069 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bevivino A, Sarrocco S, Dalmastri C, Tabacchioni S, Cantale C, Chiarini L (1998) Characterization of a free-living maize-rhizosphere population of Burkholderia cepacia: effect of seed treatment on disease suppression and growth promotion of maize. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 27:225–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(98)00069-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1327–1350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Boddey RM, Urquiaga S, Alves BJR, Reis V (2003) Endophytic nitrogen fixation in sugarcane: present knowledge and future applications. Plant Soil 252:139–149.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024152126541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bogino P, Abod A, Nievas F, Giordano W (2013) Water-limiting conditions alter the structure and biofilm-forming ability of bacterial multispecies communities in the alfalfa rhizosphere. PLoS One 8:e79614.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079614 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Botta AL, Santacecilia A, Ercole C, Cacchio P, Del Gallo M (2013) In vitro and in vivo inoculation of four endophytic bacteria on Lycopersicon esculentum. New Biotechnol 30:666–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2013.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Boukid F, Folloni S, Sforza S, Vittadini E, Prandi B (2018) Current trends in ancient grains-based foodstuffs : insights into nutritional aspects and technological applications. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 17:123–136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burbage DA, Sasser M (1982) A medium selective for Pseudomonas cepacia. Phytopathol 72:706Google Scholar
  23. Burdman S, Okon Y, Jurkevitch E (2000) Surface characteristics of Azospirillum brasilense in relation to cell aggregation and attachment to plant roots. Crit Rev Microbiol 26:91–110.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10408410091154200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cavalcante VA, Döbereneir J (1988) A new acid-tolerant nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with sugar cane. Plant Soil 108:23–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Choudhury ATMA, Kennedy IR (2004) Prospects and potentials for systems of biological nitrogen fixation in sustainable rice production. Biol Fertil Soils 39:219–227.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-003-0706-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coenye T, Mahenthiralingan E, Henry D, Hoste B, Vandemulebroukcke K, Gillis M, Speert DP, Vandamme P (2001) Burkholderia ambifaria sp. nov., a novel member of the Burkholderia cepacea complex comprising biocontrol and cystic-fibrosis related isolates. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:1481–1490.  https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-4-1481 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Combes-Meynet E, Pothier JF, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Prigent-Combaret C (2011) The Pseudomonas secondary metabolite 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol is a signal inducing rhizoplane expression of Azospirillum genes involved in plant-growth promotion. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24:271–284.  https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-07-10-0148 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cooper R (2015) Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Re-discovering ancient wheat varieties as functional foods. J Tradit Chin Med Sci 5:138–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2015.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dal Cortivo C, Barion G, Visioli G, Mattarozzi M, Mosca G, Vamerali T (2017) Agriculture, ecosystems and environment increased root growth and nitrogen accumulation in common wheat following PGPR inoculation: assessment of plant-microbe interactions by ESEM. Agric Ecosyst Environ 247:396–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dashti N, Zhang F, Hynes R, Smith DL (1997) Application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) increases protein and dry matter yield under short-season conditions. Plant Soil 188:33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004295827311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Di Benedetto N, Corbo MR, Campaniello D, Cataldi MP, Bevilacqua A, Sinigaglia M, Flagella Z (2017) The role of plant growth promoting bacteria in improving nitrogen use efficiency for sustainable crop production: a focus on wheat. AIMS Microbiol 3:413–434.  https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.413 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Díaz-Zorita, Fernández-Canigia (2009) Field performance of a liquid formulation of Azospirillum brasilense on dryland wheat productivity. Eur J Soil Biol 45:3–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dinelli G, Carretero AS, Di Silvestro R, Marotti I, Fu S, Benedettelli S, Ghiselli L, Gutiérrez AF (2009) Determination of phenolic compounds in modern and old varieties of durum wheat using liquid chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1216:7229–7240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.041 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dinu M, Whittaker A, Pagliai G, Benedettelli S, Sofi F (2018) Ancient wheat species and human health: biochemical and clinical implications. J Nutr Biochem 52:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.09.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dixit AA, Azar KMJ, Gardner CD, Palaniappan LP (2011) Incorporation of whole, ancient grains into a modern Asian Indian diet to reduce the burden of chronic disease. Nutr Rev 69:479–488.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00411.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A, Thys A, Vande Broek A, Vanderleyden J (1999) Phytostimulatory effect of Azospirillum brasilense wild type and mutant strains altered in IAA production on wheat. Plant Soil 212:153–162.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004658000815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Döbereneir J (1991) The genera Azospirillum and Herbaspirillum. In: Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer K-H (eds) The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria: ecophysiology, isolation, identification, applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 2236–2253Google Scholar
  38. Dutta S, Podile AR (2010) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): the bugs to debug the root zone. Crit Rev Microbiol 36:232–244.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10408411003766806 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Eskew DL, Focht DD, Ting IP (1977) Nitrogen fixation, denitrification and pleomorphic growth in highly pigmented Spirillum lipoferum. Can J Microbiol 34:582–585Google Scholar
  40. Evans JR (1983) Nitrogen and photosynthesis in the flag leaf of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol 72:297–302.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.72.2.297 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Fuentes-Ramirez LE, Jimenez-Salgado T, Abarca-Ocampo IR, Caballero-Mellado J (1993) Acetobacter diazotrophicus, an indolacetic acid producing bacterium isolated from sugarcane cultivars of Mexico. Plant Soil 154:145–150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fulchieri M, Lucangeli C, Bottini R (1993) Inoculation with Azospirillum lipoferum affects growth and gibberellin status of corn seedling roots. Plant Cell Physiol 34:1305–1309.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Germida JJ, Siciliano SD (2001) Taxonomic diversity of bacteria associated with the roots of modern, recent and ancient wheat cultivars. Biol Fertil Soils 33:410–415.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740100343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gholami A, Shahsavani S, Nezarat S (2009) The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on germination, seedling growth and yield of maize. Int J Biol Life Sci 5:35–40Google Scholar
  45. Hartmann A, Zimmer W (1994) Physiology of Azospirillum. In: Okon Y (ed) Azospirillum/ plant associations. CRC Press, Raton, pp 15–39Google Scholar
  46. Isopi R, Fabbri P, Del Gallo M, Puppi G (1995) Dual inoculation of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ssp. bicolor with arbuscular mycorrhizas and Acetobacter diazotrophicus. Symbiosis 18:43–55Google Scholar
  47. Jain DK, Patriquin DG (1985) Characterization of a substance produced by Azospirillum which causes branching of wheat root hairs. Can J Microbiol 31:206–210.  https://doi.org/10.1139/m85-039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. James EK, Olivares FL, de Oliveira AL, dos Reis FB, da Silva LG, Reis VM (2001) Further observations on the interaction between sugar cane and Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. J Exp Bot 52:747–760.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.357.747 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Karimi N, Javad M, Samina Z (2018) Endophytic Azospirillum for enhancement of growth and yield of wheat. Environ Sustain 1:149–158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-018-0014-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaushal M, Wani SP (2016) Rhizobacterial-plant interactions: strategies ensuring plant growth promotion under drought and salinity stress. Agric Ecosyst Environ 231:68–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kumar A, Dames JF, Gupta A, Sharma S, Gilbert JA, Ahmad P (2015) Current developments in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi research and its role in salinity stress alleviation: a biotechnological perspective. Crit Rev Biotechnol 8551:461–474.  https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2014.899964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mahbouba B, Christine LR, Nadir B, Ykhlef N, Abdelhamid D (2013) Phenotypic and molecular characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) in Algeria. Afr J Microbiol Res 7:2893–2904.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.2028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Majeed A, Abbasi MK, Hameed S, Imran A, Rahim N (2015) Isolation and characterization of rhizobacteria from wheat rhizosphere and their effect on plant growth promotion. Front Microbiol 6:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Martinez-Drets GM, Del Gallo M, Burpee C, Burris RH (1984) Catabolism of carbohydrates and organic acids and expression of nitrogenase by the azospirilla. J Bacteriol 139:80–85Google Scholar
  55. Mefleh M, Conte P, Fadda C, Giunta F, Piga A, Hassoun G, Motzo R (2018) From ancient to old and modern durum wheat varieties: interaction among cultivar traits, management and technological quality. J Sci Food Agric 99:2059–2067.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9388 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Meneses CHSG, Rouws LFM, Simões-araújo JL, Vidal MS, Baldani JI (2011) Exopolysaccharide production is required for biofilm formation and plant colonization by the nitrogen-fixing endophyte Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 24:1448–1458.  https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-05-11-0127 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Molina-Favero C, Creus CM, Simontacchi M, Puntarulo S, Lamattina L (2008) Aerobic nitric oxide production by Azospirillum brasilense Sp245 and its influence on root architecture in tomato. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 21:1001–1009.  https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-21-7-1001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Naiman AD, Latrónico A, de Salamone IEG (2009) Inoculation of wheat with Azospirillum brasilense and Pseudomonas fluorescens : impact on the production and culturable rhizosphere microflora. Eur J Soil Biol 45:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Namvar A, Khandan T (2013) Response of wheat to mineral nitrogen fertilizer and biofertilizer (Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp.) inoculation under different levels of weed interference. Ekologija 59:85–94.  https://doi.org/10.6001/ekologija.v59i2.2711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Neiverth A, Delai S, Garcia DM, Saatkamp K, Maltempid de Souza E, de Oliveira PF, Guimarāes VF, Fonseca dos Santos M, Gruszka Vendruscolo EC, Torres da Costa AC (2014) Performance of different wheat genotypes inoculated with the plant growth promoting bacterium Herbaspirillum seropedicae. Eur J Soil Biol 64:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nelson DR, Mele PM (2006) The impact of crop residue amendments and lime on microbial community structure and nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the wheat rhizosphere. Soil Res 44:319–329.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR06022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pagnani G, Pellegrini M, Galieni A, D’Egidio S, Matteucci F, Ricci A, Stagnari F, Sergi M, Lo Sterzo C, Pisante M, Del Gallo M (2018) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in Cannabis sativa ‘Finola’ cultivation: an alternative fertilization strategy to improve plant growth and quality characteristics. Ind Crop Prod 123:75–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pereyra MA, Ballesteros FM, Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Barassi CA (2009) Seedlings growth promotion by Azospirillum brasilense under normal and drought conditions remains unaltered in Tebuconazole-treated wheat seeds. Eur J Soil Biol 45:20–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pérez-Jaramillo JE, Mendes R, Raaijmakers JM (2016) Impact of plant domestication on rhizosphere microbiome assembly and functions. Plant Mol Biol 90:635–644.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-015-0337-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Pérez-Montaño F, Alías-Villegas C, Bellogín RA, Del Cerro P, Espuny MR, Jiménez-Guerrero I, López-Baena FJ, Ollero FJ, Cubo T (2014) Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: from microorganism capacities to crop production. Microbiol Res 169:325–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Plaza-Bonilla D, Alvaro-Fuentes J, Arrue JL, Cantero-Martinez C (2014) Tillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on nitrous oxide yield-scaled emissions in a rainfed Mediterranean area. Agric Ecosyst Environ 189:43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prabha MR, Karthiyayini R, Viji M, Balakumbagan R (2017) Effect of biofertilizers on biomass yield and quality of Ocimum basilicum L. In: Kumar V, Kumar M, Sharma S, Prasad R (eds) Probiotics and plant health. Springer, Berlin, pp 443–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prasanna R, Pattnaik S, Sugitha TCK, Nain L, Saxena AK (2011) Development of cyanobacterium-based biofilms and their in vitro evaluation for agriculturally useful traits. Folia Microbiol 56:49–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-011-0013-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Primo ED, Ruiz F, Masciarelli O, Giordano W (2015) Biofilm formation and biosurfactant activity in plant-associated Bacteria. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Bacterial metabolites in sustainable Agroecosystem. Springer, Berlin, pp 337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment of statistical computing. Available from:. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.rproject.org
  72. Raja P, Uma S, Gopal H, Govindarajan K (2006) Impact of bio inoculants consortium on rice root exudates, biological nitrogen fixation and plant growth. J Biol Sci 6:815–823.  https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2006.815.823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rajasekar S, Elango R (2011) Effect of microbial consortium on plant growth and improvement of alkaloid content in Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha). Curr Bot 2:27–30Google Scholar
  74. Ram V, Misra SK, Upadhyay RM (2002) Effect of sulphur, zinc and biofertilizers on yield and nutrients uptake in mungbean. Indian J Pulses Res 15:169–171Google Scholar
  75. Ramirez-Mata A, Pacheco MR, Moreno SJ, Xiqui-Vazquez ML, Baca BE (2018) Versatile use of Azospirillum brasilense strains tagged with egfp and mCherry genes for the visualization of biofilms associated with wheat roots. Microbiol Res 215:155–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.07.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Rekadwad BN, Khobragade CN (2017) Microbial biofilm: role in crop productivity. In: Kalia VC (ed) Microbial applications, Biomedicine, Agriculture and Industry, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roncato-Maccari LDB, Ramos HJO, Pedrosa FO, Alquini Y, Chubatsu LS, Yates MG, Rigo LU, Steffens MB, Souza EM (2003) Endophytic Herbaspirillum seropedicae expresses nif genes in gramineous plants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 45:39–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00108-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Rosenblueth M, Martínez-Romero E (2006) Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 19:827–837.  https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-19-0827 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Rouse (1973) Monitoring the vernal advancement and retrogradation (green wave effect) of natural vegetation. Texas A&M UnClaS https://ntrsnasagov/archive/nasa/casintrsnasagov/19730017588pdf. Accessed 15 May 2019
  80. Saia S, Rappa V, Ruisi P, Abenavoli MR, Sunseri F, Giambalvo D, Frenda AS, Martinelli F (2015) Soil inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms promotes plant growth and nutrient transporter genes expression in durum wheat. Front Plant Sci 6:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sarma BK, Yadav SK, Singh S, Singh HB (2015) Microbial consortium-mediated plant defense against phytopathogens: readdressing for enhancing efficacy. Soil Biol Biochem 87:25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schepers JS, Francis DD, Vigil M, Below FE (1992) Comparison of corn leaf nitrogen concentration and chlorophyll meter readings. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 23:2173–2187.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629209368733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Seneviratne G, Weerasekara MLMAW, Seneviratne KACN, Zavahir JS, Kecskés ML, Kennedy IR (2011) Importance of biofilm formation in plant growth promoting rhizobacterial action. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Plant growth and health promoting Bacteria. Springer, Berlin, pp 81–95Google Scholar
  84. Shahzad S, Khan MY, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN, Chaudhry UK (2017) Comparative effectiveness of different carriers to improve the efficacy. Pak J Bot 49:1523–1530Google Scholar
  85. Sosulski FW, Imafidon GI (1990) Amino acid composition and nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors for animal and plant foods. J Agric Food Chem 38:1351–1356.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00096a011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Spapen S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y (2009) Plant growth-promoting actions of rhizobacteria. In: Van Loon LC (ed) Advances in botanical research. Academic, Burlington, pp 283–320Google Scholar
  87. Stagnari F, Codianni P, Pisante M (2008) Agronomic and kernel quality of ancient wheats grown in central and southern Italy. Cereal Res Commun 36:313–326.  https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.36.2008.2.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stagnari F, Galieni A, Speca S, Cafiero G, Pisante M (2014) Effects of straw mulch on growth and yield of durum wheat during transition to conservation agriculture in Mediterranean environment. Field Crop Res 167:51–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Suman A, Yadav AN, Verma P (2016) Endophytic microbes in crops: diversity and beneficial impact for sustainable agriculture. In: Singh DP, Abhilash PC, Ratna P (eds) Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sun D, Hale L, Crowley D (2016) Nutrient supplementation of pinewood biochar for use as a bacterial inoculum carrier. Biol Fertil Soils 52:515–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1093-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Swarnalakshmi K, Prasanna R, Kumar A, Pattnaik S, Chakravarty K, Shivay YS, Singh R, Saxena AK (2013) Evaluating the influence of novel cyanobacterial biofilmed biofertilizers on soil fertility and plant nutrition in wheat. Eur J Soil Biol 55:107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tilak KVBR, Ranganayaki N, Pal KK, De R, Saxena AK, Shekhar Nautiyal C, Mittal S, Tripathi AK, Johri BN (2005) Diversity of plant growth and soil health supporting bacteria. Curr Sci:136–150Google Scholar
  93. Trabelsi D, Ammar HB, Mengoni A, Mhamdi R (2012) Appraisal of the crop-rotation effect of rhizobial inoculation on potato cropping systems in relation to soil bacterial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 54:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Turan M, Gulluce M, von Wirén N, Sahin F (2012) Yield promotion and phosphorus solubilization by plant growth – promoting rhizobacteria in extensive wheat production in Turkey. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 175:818–826.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201200054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Upadhyay SK, Singh JS, Saxena AK, Singh DP (2012) Impact of PGPR inoculation on growth and antioxidant status of wheat under saline conditions. Plant Biol 14:605–611.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00533.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Vacheron J, Desbrosses G, Bouffaud ML, Touraine B, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Muller D, Legendre L, Wisniewski-Dyé F, Prigent-Combaret C (2013) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front Plant Sci 4:356.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00356 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Vande Broke A, Michiels J, Van Gool A, Vanderleyden J (1993) Spatial-temporal colonization patterns of Azospirillum brasilense on the wheat root surface and expression of the beneficial nifH gene during association. MPMI 6:592–600.  https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-6-592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vanderlinde EM, Muszyn A, Harrison JJ, Koval SF, Foreman DL, Ceri H, Kannenberg EL, Carlson RW, Yost CK (2009) Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae 3841, deficient in 27-hydroxyoctacosanoate-modified lipopolysaccharide, is impaired in desiccation tolerance, biofilm formation and motility. Microbiology 155:3055–3069.  https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.025031-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S (2016) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability - a review. Molecules 21:573.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050573 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. Venieraki A, Dimou M, Pergalis P, Kefalogianni I, Chatzipavlidis I, Katinakis P (2011) The genetic diversity of culturable nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the rhizosphere of wheat. Microb Ecol 61:277–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9747-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Veresoglou SD, Menexes G (2010) Impact of inoculation with Azospirillum spp. on growth properties and seed yield of wheat: a meta-analysis of studies in the ISI Web of Science from 1981 to 2008. Plant Soil 337:469–480.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0543-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Verma JP, YadavJ TKN, Lavakush SV (2010) Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on crop production. Int J Agric Res 5:954–983.  https://doi.org/10.3923/ijar.2010.954.983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Vial L, Groleau MC, Dekimpe V, Déziel E (2007) Burkholderia diversity and versatility: an inventory of the extracellular products. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:1407–1429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1994) Current challenges in introducing beneficial microorganisms into the rhizosphere. In: O'Gara F, Dowling DN, Boesten B (eds) Molecular ecology of rhizosphere microorganisms. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  105. Zadoks JC, Chang TT,  Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res 14:415–421.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Bioscience and Technologies for Food, Agriculture and EnvironmentUniversity of TeramoTeramoItaly
  2. 2.Council for Agricultural Research and EconomicsResearch Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, ItalyMonsampolo del TrontoItaly
  3. 3.Department of Life, Health and Environmental SciencesUniversity of L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations