Advertisement

Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 299–312 | Cite as

Highly connected taxa located in the microbial network are prevalent in the rhizosphere soil of healthy plant

  • Xinqi Huang
  • Xing Zhou
  • Jinbo Zhang
  • Zucong CaiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 351 Downloads

Abstract

The microbial community in the rhizosphere soil highly affects plant health and vice versa. However, the differences in soil microbial communities associated with different pathogenic statuses in the same field and their causes have not been comprehensively investigated. Here, we deciphered the dissimilarities in the rhizosphere soils of lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum) with different pathogenic statuses in a field under uniform management strategies at multiple scales. The rhizosphere soils of diseased plants harbored higher bacterial abundances and diversities compared to that of healthy plants. The relative abundances of three keystone operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and cumulative relative abundance of members in the central module (the largest module) of microbial network significantly decreased by 51.1%, 49.4%, 47.6%, and 42.0% in the rhizosphere soil of infected plants and by 64.3%, 58.8%, 63.4%, and 61.8% in that of dying plants, while the relative abundances of Flavobacteriales, Sphingobacteriales, and Xanthomonadales significantly increased to 4.89-, 1.88-, and 1.44-fold in the rhizosphere soil of infected plants and to 2.89-, 1.55-, and 1.66-fold in that of dying plants, respectively compared with that of healthy plants. Some human disease-related pathways and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis were more prevalent in the rhizosphere soils of diseased plants. Stochastic processes contributed more than 50.6% and 86.4% to the assembly of different bacterial and fungal communities in these soils, and plants further shaped the bacterial communities, compared to fungal communities, probably by actively recruiting some potential suppressive agents in their rhizosphere when attacked by the pathogen. Overall, here, we firstly reported that the keystone taxa and members in the central module were enriched in the rhizosphere soil of healthy plants, which might be a potential indicator for the soil supporting plant health.

Keywords

Rhizosphere Disease suppression Microbial network Keystone Antagonist 

Notes

Funding information

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41771281, 41701304, 41701277); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0200600); the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and the Key Subjects of Jiangsu Province (Ecology).

Supplementary material

374_2019_1350_MOESM1_ESM.docx (5.1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 5218 kb)

References

  1. Adam G, Duncan H (2001) Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33:943–951Google Scholar
  2. Alabouvette C, Olivain C, Steinberg C (2006) Biological control of plant diseases: the European situation. Eur J Plant Pathol 114:329–341Google Scholar
  3. Bailey KL, Lazarovits G (2003) Suppressing soil-borne diseases with residue management and organic amendments. Soil Tillage Res 72:169–180Google Scholar
  4. Basotra N, Kaur B, Di Falco M, Tsang A, Chadha BS (2016) Mycothermus thermophilus (Syn. Scytalidium thermophilum): repertoire of a diverse array of efficient cellulases and hemicellulases in the secretome revealed. Bioresour Technol 222:413–421Google Scholar
  5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B (Methodol) 57:289–300Google Scholar
  6. Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM (2012) The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci 17:478–486Google Scholar
  7. Berg G, Eberl L, Hartmann A (2005) The rhizosphere as a reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria. Environ Microbiol 7:1673–1685Google Scholar
  8. Berry D, Widder S (2014) Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks. Front Microbiol 5:219Google Scholar
  9. Bertin C, Yang X, Waston L (2003) The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 256:67–83Google Scholar
  10. Bertoldo C, Gilardi G, Spadaro D, Gullino ML, Garibaldi A (2015) Genetic diversity and virulence of Italian strains of Fusarium oxysporum isolated from Eustoma grandiflorum. Eur J Plant Pathol 141:83–97Google Scholar
  11. Blair GJ, Lefroy R, Lisle L (1995) Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems. Aust J Agric Res 46:393–406Google Scholar
  12. Bonanomi G, Antignani V, Capodilupo M, Scala F (2010) Identifying the characteristics of organic soil amendments that suppress soilborne plant diseases. Soil Biol Biochem 42:136–144Google Scholar
  13. Bremner JM (1960) Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. J Agric Sci 55:11–33Google Scholar
  14. Bremner JM, Jenkinson DS (1960) Determination of organic carbon in soil. Eur J Soil Sci 11:394–402Google Scholar
  15. Bulluck LRI, Ristaino JB (2002) Effect of synthetic and organic soil fertility amendments on southern blight, soil microbial communities, and yield of processing tomatoes. Phytopathology 92:181–189Google Scholar
  16. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336Google Scholar
  17. Cha JY, Han S, Hong HJ, Cho H, Kim D, Kwon Y, Kwon SK, Crusemann M, Bok Lee Y, Kim JF, Giaever G, Nislow C, Moore BS, Thomashow LS, Weller DM, Kwak YS (2016) Microbial and biochemical basis of a Fusarium wilt-suppressive soil. ISME J 10:119–129Google Scholar
  18. Choudhary DK, Johri BN (2009) Interactions of Bacillus spp. and plants-with special reference to induced systemic resistance (ISR). Microbiol Res 164:493–513Google Scholar
  19. Clauset A, Newman ME, Moore C (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 70:066111Google Scholar
  20. Csárdi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. Inter J Complex Syst 1695:1–9Google Scholar
  21. De Cáceres M, Legendre P, Moretti M (2010) Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. OIKOS 119:1674–1684Google Scholar
  22. Delmont TO, Francioli D, Jacquesson S, Laoudi S, Mathieu A, Nesme J, Ceccherini MT, Nannipieri P, Simonet P, Vogel TM (2014) Microbial community development and unseen diversity recovery in inoculated sterile soil. Biol Fertil Soils 50:1069–1076Google Scholar
  23. Deng Y, Jiang YH, Yang Y, He Z, Luo F, Zhou J (2012) Molecular ecological network analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 13:113–132Google Scholar
  24. Fierer N (2017) Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:579–590Google Scholar
  25. Gamliel A, Austerweil M, Kritzman G (2000) Non-chemical approach to soilborne pest management-organic amendments. Crop Prot 19:847–853Google Scholar
  26. Gullino ML, Camponogara A, Gasparrini G, Rizzo V, Clini C, Garibaldi A (2003) Replacing methyl bromide for soil disinfestation: the ltalian experience and implications for other countries. Plant Dis 87:1012–1021Google Scholar
  27. Hartman K, van der Heijden MGA, Wittwer RA, Banerjee S, Walser JC, Schlaeppi K (2018) Cropping practices manipulate abundance patterns of root and soil microbiome members paving the way to smart farming. Microbiome 6:14Google Scholar
  28. Hassani MA, Duran P, Hacquard S (2018) Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome 6:58Google Scholar
  29. Hervé M (2015) RVAideMemoire: diverse basic statistical and graphical functions. R package version 0.9-45-2. Computer softwareGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoitink HAJ, Boehm MJ (1999) Biocontrol within the context of soil microbial communities: a substrate-dependent phenomenon. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:427–446Google Scholar
  31. Huang X, Chen L, Ran W, Shen Q, Yang X (2011) Trichoderma harzianum strain SQR-T37 and its bio-organic fertilizer could control Rhizoctonia solani damping-off disease in cucumber seedlings mainly by the mycoparasitism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:741–755Google Scholar
  32. Huang X, Liu L, Wen T, Zhu R, Zhang J, Cai Z (2015) Illumina MiSeq investigations on the changes of microbial community in the Fusarium oxysporum f.Sp. cubense infected soil during and after reductive soil disinfestation. Microbiol Res 181:33–42Google Scholar
  33. Huang X, Liu L, Wen T, Zhang J, Wang F, Cai Z (2016) Changes in the soil microbial community after reductive soil disinfestation and cucumber seedling cultivation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5581–5593Google Scholar
  34. Jaiswal AK, Elad Y, Paudel I, Graber ER, Cytryn E, Frenkel O (2017) Linking the belowground microbial composition, diversity and activity to soilborne disease suppression and growth promotion of tomato amended with biochar. Sci Rep UK 7:44382Google Scholar
  35. Janvier C, Villeneuve F, Alabouvette C, Edel-Hermann V, Mateille T, Steinberg C (2007) Soil health through soil disease suppression: which strategy from descriptors to indicators? Soil Biol Biochem 39:1–23Google Scholar
  36. Katan J (1996) Cultural practices and soilborne disease management. In: Utkhede RS, Gupta VK (eds) Management of soilborne diseases. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, pp 100–122Google Scholar
  37. Kembel SW, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Cornwell WK, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Morlon H, Webb CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463–1464Google Scholar
  38. Kyselkova M, Kopecky J, Frapolli M, Defago G, Sagova-Mareckova M, Grundmann GL, Moenne-Loccoz Y (2009) Comparison of rhizobacterial community composition in soil suppressive or conducive to tobacco black root rot disease. ISME J 3:1127–1138Google Scholar
  39. Lakshmanan V, Selvaraj G, Bais HP (2014) Functional soil microbiome: belowground solutions to an aboveground problem. Plant Physiol 166:689–700Google Scholar
  40. Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Vega Thurber RL, Knight R, Beiko RG, Huttenhower C (2013) Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31:814–821Google Scholar
  41. Liu Y, Zhang N, Qiu M, Feng H, Vivanco JM, Shen Q, Zhang R (2014) Enhanced rhizosphere colonization of beneficial Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 by pathogen infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett 353:49–56Google Scholar
  42. Löbmann MT, Vetukuri RR, de Zinger L, Alsanius BW, Grenville-Briggs LJ, Walter AJ (2016) The occurrence of pathogen suppressive soils in Sweden in relation to soil biota, soil properties, and farming practices. Appl Soil Ecol 107:57–65Google Scholar
  43. Marilley L, Vogt G, Blanc M, Aragno M (1998) Bacterial diversity in the bulk soil and rhizosphere fractions of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens as revealed by PCR restriction analysis of 16S rDNA. Plant Soil 198:219–224Google Scholar
  44. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217Google Scholar
  45. Mendes R, Kruijt M, de Bruijn I, Dekkers E, van der Voort M, Schneider JHM, Piceno YM, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Bakker PAHM, Raaijmakers JM (2011) Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332:1097–1100Google Scholar
  46. Mendes R, Garbeva P, Raaijmakers JM (2013) The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:634–663Google Scholar
  47. Nicol GW, Leininger S, Schleper C, Prosser JI (2008) The influence of soil pH on the diversity, abundance and transcriptional activity of ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria. Environ Microbiol 10:2966–2978Google Scholar
  48. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2011) vegan: community ecology package. R package version, pp 117–118Google Scholar
  49. Omirou M, Rousidou C, Bekris F, Papadopoulou KK, Menkissoglou-Spiroudi U, Ehaliotis C, Karpouzas DG (2011) The impact of biofumigation and chemical fumigation methods on the structure and function of the soil microbial community. Microb Ecol 61:201–213Google Scholar
  50. Pal KK, McSpadden Gardener B (2006) Biological control of plant pathogens. The Plant Health Instructor.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI-A-2006-1117-1002
  51. Pankhurst CE, Lynch JM (1994) The role of the soil biota in sustainable agriculture. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR, Grace PR (eds) Soil biota. CSIRO, East Melbourne, pp 3–9Google Scholar
  52. Pankhurst CE, Blair BL, Magarey RC, Stirling GR, Bell MJ, Garside AL (2005) Effect of rotation breaks and organic matter amendments on the capacity of soils to develop biological suppression towards soil organisms associated with yield decline of sugarcane. Appl Soil Ecol 28:271–282Google Scholar
  53. Peng HX, Sivasithamparam K, Turner DW (1999) Chlamydospore germination and Fusarium wilt of banana plantlets in suppressive and conducive soils are affected by physical and chemical factors. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1363–1374Google Scholar
  54. Pérez-Piqueres A, Edel-Hermann V, Alabouvette C, Steinberg C (2006) Response of soil microbial communities to compost amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 38:460–470Google Scholar
  55. Raaijmakers JM, Paulitz TC, Steinberg C, Alabouvette C, Moënne-Loccoz Y (2009) The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil 321:341–361Google Scholar
  56. Romaniuk R, Giuffré L, Costantini A, Nannipieri P (2011) Assessment of soil microbial diversity measurements as indicators of soil functioning in organic and conventional horticulture systems. Ecol Indic 11:1345–1353Google Scholar
  57. Schloter M, Nannipieri P, Sørensen SJ, van Elsas JD (2018) Microbial indicators for soil quality. Biol Fertil Soils 54:1–10Google Scholar
  58. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13:2498–2504Google Scholar
  59. Shi Y, Li Y, Xiang X, Sun R, Yang T, He D, Zhang K, Ni Y, Zhu YG, Adams JM, Chu H (2018) Spatial scale affects the relative role of stochasticity versus determinism in soil bacterial communities in wheat fields across the North China Plain. Microbiome 6:27Google Scholar
  60. Stegen JC, Lin X, Konopka AE, Fredrickson JK (2012) Stochastic and deterministic assembly processes in subsurface microbial communities. ISME J 6:1653–1664Google Scholar
  61. Stringlis IA, Yu K, Feussner K, de Jonge R, Van Bentum S, Van Verk MC, Berendsen RL, Bakker P, Feussner I, Pieterse CMJ (2018) MYB72-dependent coumarin exudation shapes root microbiome assembly to promote plant health. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E5213–E5222Google Scholar
  62. Toju H, Peay KG, Yamamichi M, Narisawa K, Hiruma K, Naito K, Fukuda S, Ushio M, Nakaoka S, Onoda Y, Yoshida K, Schlaeppi K, Bai Y, Sugiura R, Ichihashi Y, Minamisawa K, Kiers ET (2018) Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems. Nat Plants 4:247–257Google Scholar
  63. Tripathi BM, Stegen JC, Kim M, Dong K, Adams JM, Lee YK (2018) Soil pH mediates the balance between stochastic and deterministic assembly of bacteria. ISME J 12:1072–1083Google Scholar
  64. van Bruggen AHC, Semenov AM (2000) In search of biological indicators for soil health and disease suppression. Appl Soil Ecol 15:13–24Google Scholar
  65. Vannacci G, Harman GE (1987) Biocontrol of seed-borne Alternaria raphani and A. brassicicola. Can J Microbiol 33:850–856Google Scholar
  66. Verma M, Brar SK, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY, Valéro JR (2007) Antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma spp.: panoply of biological control. Biochem Eng J 37:1–20Google Scholar
  67. Wang J, Rhodes G, Huang Q, Shen Q (2018) Plant growth stages and fertilization regimes drive soil fungal community compositions in a wheat-rice rotation system. Biol Fertil Soils 54:731–742Google Scholar
  68. Workneh F, van Bruggen AHC, Drinkwater LE, Shennan C (1993) Variables associated with corky root and Phytophthora root rot of tomatoes in organic and conventional farms. Phytopathology 83:581–589Google Scholar
  69. Wu HS, Gao ZQ, Zhou XD, Shi X, Wang MY, Shang XX, Liu YD, Gu DL, Wang WZ, Goss M (2013) Microbial dynamics and natural remediation patterns of Fusarium-infested watermelon soil under 3-yr of continuous fallow condition. Soil Use Manag 29:220–229Google Scholar
  70. Zhang N, Wu K, He X, Li SQ, Zhang ZH, Shen B, Yang XM, Zhang RF, Huang QW, Shen QR (2011) A new bioorganic fertilizer can effectively control banana wilt by strong colonization with Bacillus subtilis N11. Plant Soil 344:87–97Google Scholar
  71. Zhao J, Ni T, Li Y, Xiong W, Ran W, Shen B, Shen Q, Zhang R (2014) Responses of bacterial communities in arable soils in a rice-wheat cropping system to different fertilizer regimes and sampling times. PLoS One 9:e5301Google Scholar
  72. Zhou X, Zhang J, Pan D, Ge X, Jin X, Chen S, Wu F (2018) p-Coumaric can alter the composition of cucumber rhizosphere microbial communities and induce negative plant-microbial interactions. Biol Fertil Soils 54:363–372Google Scholar
  73. Ziadi N, Tran TS (2007) Mehlich 3-extractable elements. In: Gregorich EG, Carter MR (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geography ScienceNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and ApplicationNanjingChina
  3. 3.Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Materials Cycling and Pollution ControlNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina
  4. 4.Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographical Environment (VGE), Ministry of EducationNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina
  5. 5.State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Geographical Environment Evolution (Jiangsu Province)NanjingChina

Personalised recommendations