Soil disturbance and water stress interact to influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, rhizosphere bacteria and potential for N and C cycling in an agricultural soil
- 219 Downloads
The objective of this study was to determine how soil disturbance and soil water deficit alter colonisation of roots by naturally occurring arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rhizosphere bacteria. Soil cores were collected at the end of summer from a cropped paddock with a 5-year history of no-tillage in south-western Australia which has a Mediterranean climate. Well-watered and water-stressed treatments were maintained at 70 and 35% field capacity, respectively. AM fungal colonisation was determined using microscopy, rhizosphere bacterial community composition was assessed using barcoded PCR-amplified bacterial 16S rRNA genes, and Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) analysis of functional gene prediction was used to characterise the rhizosphere functionality for some nitrogen (N) cycling and soil carbon (C) degradation. Mycorrhizal colonisation and plant growth were reduced by disturbance under water stress but not for well-watered soil cores. The rhizosphere bacterial community composition shifted with both soil disturbance and soil moisture, and there was an interaction between them. Disturbance decreased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria and increased the relative abundance of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes in water-stressed soil. The predicted abundance of some genes involved in N reactions was negatively influenced by both disturbance and soil moisture, but the predicted abundance of C degrading predicted genes was only marginally affected. This study highlighted how soil disturbance prior to seeding can alter soil biological processes that influence plant growth and that this could be most pronounced when water is limiting.
KeywordsSoil microbiology PICRUSt Abiotic stress Next generation sequencing
We thank Peter Nixon for allowing us to collect soil from his farm at Moora, Western Australia; Ian Waite for his valuable laboratory assistance and Russell Martin and Brenton Leske for assisting in the glasshouse.
This research was funded by an Australian Post Graduate Scholarship, and The University of Western Australia Safety net top up.
- Al-Kaisi MM, Yin X (2005) Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and carbon dioxide emission in corn–soybean rotations. J Env 34:437–445Google Scholar
- Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Tumbaug PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chávez-Romero Y, Navarro-Noya YE, Reynoso-Martínez SC, Sarria-Guzmán Y, Govaerts B, Verhulst N, Dendooven L, Luna-Guido M (2016) 16S metagenomics reveals changes in the soil bacterial community driven by soil organic C, N-fertilizer and tillage-crop residue management. Soil Tillage Res 159:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frank D, Reichstein M, Bahn M, Thonicke K, Frank D, Mahecha MD, Pete S, Velde M, Vicca S, Babst F, Beer C, Buchmann N, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Cramer W, Ibrom A, Miglietta F, Poulter B, Rammig A, Seneviratne S, Walz A, Wattenbach M, Zavala MA, Zscheischler J (2015) Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: concepts, processes and potential future impacts. Glob Chang Biol 21:2861–2880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giorgi F (2006) Climate change hot-spots. Geophys Res Lett 33Google Scholar
- Isbell R (2002) The Australian Soil Classification. CSIRO Publishing, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- Knopke P, O'Donnell V, Shepherd A (2000) Productivity growth in the Australian grains industry. ABARE Res Report, (2000.1)Google Scholar
- McDonald RIR, Speight J, Walker J, Hopkins M (1998) Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook. (CSIRO Publishing, Canberra)Google Scholar
- Mickan BS (2014) Mechanisms for alleviation of plant water stress involving arbuscular mycorrhizas. In: Solaiman ZM, Abbott LK, Ajit V (Ed); Mycorrhizal Fungi: In Use in Sustainable Agriculture and Land Restoration. Springer Berlin Heidelberg pp. 225–239Google Scholar
- Mori H, Maruyama F, Kato H, Toyoda A, Dozono A, Ohtsubo Y, Nagata Y, Fujiyama A, Tsuda M, Kurokawa K (2014) Design and experimental application of a novel non-degenerate universal primer set that amplifies prokaryotic 16S rRNA genes with a low possibility to amplify eukaryotic rRNA genes. DNA Res 21:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H, (2013) Package ‘vegan’. Community Ecology Package, version, 2(9)Google Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D & Team RC (2017) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (R package version 3.1–128, 2016). R softwareGoogle Scholar
- Rayment G, Lyons D (2011) Soil chemical methods—Australasia. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar