Impact of microbial activity on the leaching of soluble N forms in soil
- 1.1k Downloads
The hydrological transport of low-molecular weight organic nitrogen (LMWON) compounds has received little attention in the literature, particularly relative to inorganic nitrogen (N), with less attention given to the decoupling of the carbon (C) and N cycles following rainfall events. We determined the impacts of the soil biota on the transport of N compounds in a loam soil, using 15N and 13C to trace the vertical transport of 15N13C-urea, 15N13C-amino acids, 15NO3, and 15NH4 through the soil profile, following simulated rainfall events. This research has demonstrated that biotic assimilation leads to rapid decoupling of the C and N cycles during leaching, with C transport limited to the soil surface (< 2 cm), whereas N which was stored within the soil profile during a single rainfall event could be remobilised and leached (a further 2–6 cm) following an additional rainfall event.
KeywordsAmino acids DON Immobilisation Leaching Mobilisation Urea
Hydrological transfer of nitrogen (N) in agricultural systems has typically focussed on the inorganic N forms of ammonium (NH4 +) and nitrate (NO3 −), due to their relevance as N fertilisers (Lipiec et al. 2011; Peukert et al. 2014), and implications for eutrophication of surface waters and aquifers (Durand et al. 2011). Globally, however, urea (CH4N2O) remains the commonest form of fertiliser N applied to soil (Glibert et al. 2006), and due to its low cost and high N content its use is predicted to increase. As urea is known to rapidly hydrolyse in soil (forming (NH4)2CO3) and become susceptible to N losses by volatilisation (as NH3; Chambers and Dampney 2009), studies that examine urea cycling and N transport often focus on NH4 + and NO3 −. Research focussing on intact urea transport is limited, although it is known to be transferred to receiving waterbodies, where it provides an N source to aquatic biota (Glibert et al. 2006). Similarly, other forms of dissolved organic N (DON) can also be lost to waterbodies, providing a bioavailable N source (Heathwaite and Johnes 1996; Durand et al. 2011). This focus on DON as a pathway of N losses (van Kessel et al. 2009) has meant that studies examining DON leaching have tended to focus on N and exclude C dynamics (Zhou et al. 2006; Abaas et al. 2012). However, uptake of low molecular weight organic N (LMWON) and its subsequent assimilation or immobilisation can primarily be driven by the C demands of soil microbes (Farrell et al. 2014). Thus, there is a need to examine both C and N dynamics to better understand the mechanisms behind mobilisation, immobilisation and leaching of DON.
Here we examine the role of single and double simulated rainfall events on leaching of 15N13C-urea, 15N13C-amino acids (AA), and 15NO3 − and 15NH4 + through soil profiles. The importance of microbial activity for decoupling the C and N cycles (Knowles et al. 2010) through immobilisation/mobilisation processes was also assessed using sterile and non-sterile soil. A double rainfall event was simulated to examine the potential for C and N re-mobilisation following initial biotic immobilisation.
Materials and methods
Soil collection and processing
Soil was collected from 0 to 10 cm depth at a grassland site in the UK (Dystric Cambisol; online resource; Table S1), and stored at 4 °C in gas permeable bags before use, with three separate sites (2 m apart) forming the three replicates used throughout the study. Each soil replicate was sieved to < 2 mm and allowed to equilibrate at 20 °C overnight, prior to use in the leaching experiment, or for background characterisation of the soil. The centrifugation-drainage technique (Giesler and Lundström 1993) was used to obtain soil solution for background characterisation. All other soil properties were determined on the < 2 mm soil (see online Resource 1 for soil background characterisation methods; Table S1). A subsample was autoclaved twice at 121 °C for 20 min, for use as a sterilised control to distinguish the importance of biotic processes.
Nitrogen and carbon transport experiment
Soil columns (9 × 235 mm; i.d. × h) were packed to a density of 0.69 g cm−3 with either sterile or non-sterile < 2 mm soil to a height of 20 cm. Nitrogen treatments were applied to the surface of the soil column and consisted of a 50 μl addition of 10 mM N as 15N13C-urea, 15N13C-AA (equimolar mixture of asparagine acid, threonine, serine, glutamine, proline, glycine, alanine, valine, methionine, isoleucine, leucine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, histidine, lysine, and arginine; Sigma-Aldrich, 487910), K15NO3, or 15NH4Cl (all labelled compounds were > 98 atom%). Two leaching scenarios were examined, the first (LS1) was a single 30 min simulated rainfall event, started immediately after treatment application on both the sterile and non-sterile soils. The second (LS2) was the same as for LS1, however it was only conducted on non-sterile soils and, after the soil columns had been incubated at 10 °C for 7 days in the dark. All simulated rainfall events were conducted at an equivalent rainfall rate of 1.9 mm h−1 to simulate a low-intensity rainfall event (not inclusive of the treatment addition), using locally collected rainwater delivered via a peristaltic pump. Following LS1, or LS2, soil columns were immediately cut into 1 cm sections between 0 and 10 cm depth (the maximum wetting front depth observed). Individual sections were placed in paper bags and dried at 80 °C for a minimum of 48 h to minimise microbial activity and remove soil moisture. Following drying, the 1 cm subsections were ball-milled to a fine powder, and subsamples weighed and sealed into 8 × 5 mm tin capsules prior to analysis.
Laboratory and data analyses
Results and discussion
Across all treatments and transport scenarios, over the 0–10 cm depth sampled, mean 15N recoveries were 92 ± 3%. In contrast, mean 13C recovery was 69 ± 5%, with 13C recovery in the non-sterile soils much reduced at 62 and 48% for 15N13C-AA, and 6.2 and 5.9% for 15N13C-urea under LS1 and LS2, respectively. The lower recovery of 13C in the non-sterile soils can be related to C losses via microbial assimilation and respiration processes. We were unable to detect any culturable organisms following the culturing of sterile soil (data presented in Carswell et al. (2016)), nonetheless this method does not account for the presence of viable but non-culturable organisms (Kell et al. 1998). However, reduced 13C recoveries of 73 and 65% were also observed in the sterilised soils for 15N13C-AA and 15N13C-urea, respectively. Wessel and Tietema (1992) suggest reduced recoveries can be caused by low 13C application amounts and subsequent dilution into the natural abundance 13C pool. Here, the compounds used were > 98 atom% labelled, so any further addition would have required increasing the concentration of applied compounds beyond that which could reasonably be justified. It is also possible that during sterilisation microbial cells were lysed, increasing extracellular organic C and consequently diluting the labelled 13C pool within the sterile soils.
Biotic processes influence N transport
These results are indicative of rapid decoupling of the C and N cycle within the non-sterile soil columns under the 15N13C-urea treatment. The loss of 13C from the non-sterile soils under the 13C15N–urea treatment and to a lesser extent from the 13C15N–AA treatment (see Fig. 1, total 13C recovery of 6.2, and 62%, respectively) is likely due to rapid N mineralisation (Knowles et al. 2010). This can occur via biotic uptake, which was observed in the same soil for 14C–urea and 14C–L-arginine (Carswell et al. 2016), or via extracellular enzymes, like urease which can rapidly mineralise urea (Tabatabai 1994), with both processes leading to CO2 losses. Following mineralisation of 13C15N–urea or 13C15N–AA, the C and N cycle are decoupled (Knowles et al. 2010; see Fig. 1), the C is removed from the soil in a gaseous phase and the N remains in the soil matrix where it may be recycled and transformed into other N compounds.
Repeated rainfall event remobilises and transfers N further down the soil column
After a 7-day incubation and a repeat simulated rainfall event (LS2), which was conducted on the non-sterile soil only, 13C recoveries of 5.9 and 48%, for 13C15N–urea and 13C15N–AA, respectively were observed. Mineralisation of AA, both individual and mixtures, have been observed to have a bi-phasic profile, where initially AA mineralisation is rapid, and is then followed by a slower secondary phase (Jones et al. 2009). In this study, the reduction in 13C recoveries after a 7-day incubation may be due to the extended duration of a slower secondary mineralisation phase. In the secondary mineralisation phase 13C losses are caused by turnover of the soil microbes, which had previously assimilated the 15N13C-AA (Boddy et al. 2007).
In contrast, under LS2, re-mobilisation of 15N and subsequent leaching occurred under all treatments, with 15N reaching 8, 8, 10, and 10 cm depth after LS2, increases of 6, 5, 4, and 2 cm from LS1, for 15NH4 +, 13C15N–AA, 13C15N–urea, and 15NO3 −, respectively. This suggests that 15N was released back into the soil solution by soil microbes, although not for 15NO3 − which was not immobilised under LS1 and was transported with the wetting front. Once in the soil solution the 15N compounds would have been available for N cycling processes, including re-uptake by soil microbes. Consequently, 15N13C-AA uptake and earlier immobilisation by microbial activity following LS1 was almost certainly driven by C rather than N demand, as the 13C was depleted and the remaining 15N was re-mobilised in LS2, suggesting an imbalance of microbial resource stoichiometry (Zhou et al. 2017). The addition of exogenous N and C to the soil in this study would have a priming effect on soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition (Chen et al. 2014). We suggest that, due to the high soil N supply in this agricultural soil, SOM decomposition would follow the stoichiometric decomposition theory of Craine et al. (2007) rather than the microbial N mining theory. Our findings are also in agreement with that of Farrell et al. (2014) who concluded that amino acid uptake by soil microbes was due to a requirement for C rather than N.
To the knowledge of the authors, this dataset is the first to report the impact of two different leaching scenarios (simulated rainfall events) on the transfer of dual isotopically-labelled LMWON compounds in soil. The results support the theory that biotic uptake of LMWON is largely driven by microbial demand for C rather than N, particularly in soils with high N supply, with large 13C losses via mineralisation and other metabolic processes, and the release and subsequent re-mobilisation of 15N into the soil solution. Transport of inorganic N compounds was also shown to be affected by biotic processes, although to a lesser extent than that of LMWON compounds. This work has shown that LMWON compounds are immobilised and transported in compound specific ways, which should be considered when modelling N pools and dynamics.
We acknowledge Dr. Kate le Cocq for her assistance in the laboratory.
This work was funded by the Lawes Trust/University of Reading Studentship and the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NE/K01093X/1).
- Chambers B, Dampney P (2009) Nitrogen efficiency and ammonia emissions from urea-based and ammonium nitrate fertilisers. In Proceedings No. 657 International Fertiliser Society, York, pp 1–20Google Scholar
- Lipiec J, Nosalewicz A, Siczek A, Kotowska U (2011) Effects of land use on leaching of nitrate-N, ammonium-N and phosphate in relation to stained surface area. Int Agrophys 25:149–154Google Scholar
- Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angel GS, Bottomley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 2: microbiological and biochemical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am Inc, Madison, pp 775–833Google Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.