Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 367–376 | Cite as

Effects of different phosphorus-efficient legumes and soil texture on fractionated rhizosphere soil phosphorus of strongly weathered soils

  • Soh SugiharaEmail author
  • Yutaro Tomita
  • Tomohiro Nishigaki
  • Method Kilasara
  • Jun Wasaki
  • Shinya Funakawa
Original Paper


Phosphorus (P) deficiency is one of the largest constraints to crop production in tropical Africa; so, it is necessary to better exploit soil P resources through increasing labile soil P using P-efficient plants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various P-efficient legumes on fractionated rhizosphere soil P in two contrasting textured soils of Tanzania, i.e., strongly weathered soils. We conducted a 30-day pot experiment, where white lupin (Lupinus albus L.; WL), cowpea (Vignaungui culate L.; CP), and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.: PP) were grown with and without N application (0 and 50 kg N ha−1). Plant growth, P uptake, rhizosphere pH, and fractionated soil P were investigated. Plant P uptake decreased in the following order: WL > CP > PP in clayey soil and CP > PP > WL in sandy soil. We observed clear effects of all legumes on the rhizosphere soil P dynamics of all fractions in both soils, except for the labile P fraction in clayey soil. The effect of legume growth on the contents of less labile inorganic P fraction (NaOH-Pi) was significantly different between legumes; NaOH-Pi contents of WL was significantly lower than those of CP and PP. All legumes substantially increased the less labile organic P fraction, and its ratio was significantly higher in sandy soil. Our results suggest that WL had different P mobilization characteristics from CP and PP and that the effect of P-efficient legume cultivation on soil P availability should be more important in the inherently P poor sandy soil than in clayey soil.


P fractionation White lupin Cowpea Pigeon pea Soil texture Sub-Saharan Africa 



We thank Prof. J.J.T. Msaky and the staff of the Sokoine University of Agriculture for their kind technical support in the field and laboratory experiments in Tanzania. The Japan Prize Foundation in 2013 and Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grant numbers 25850040, 24255019, and 24228007 financially supported this work.


  1. Ae N, Arihara J, Okada K, Yoshihara T, Johansen C (1990) Phosphorus uptake by pigeon pea and its role in cropping systems of the Indian subcontinent. Science 248:477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvey S, Bagayoko M, Neumann G, Buerkert A (2001) Cereal/legume rotations affect chemical properties and biological activities in two West African soils. Plant Soil 231:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagayoko M, Albey S, Neumann G, Buerkert A (2000) Root-induced increases in soil pH and nutrient availability to field-grown cereals and legumes on acid sandy soils of Sudano-Sahelian West Africa. Plant Soil 225:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dissanayaka DMSB, Maruyama H, Masuda G, Wasaki J (2015) Interspecific facilitation of P acquisition in intercropping of maize with white lupin in two contrasting soils as influenced by different rates and forms of P supply. Plant Soil 390:223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gahoonia TS, Nielsen NE (1992) The effects of root-induced pH changes on the depletion of inorganic and organic phosphorus in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 143:185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gijsman AJ (1990) Nitrogen nutrition of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) on strongly acid sandy soil. II. Proton excretion and rhizosphere pH. Plant Soil 126:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert N (2009) The disappearing nutrient. Nature 461:716–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Grayston SJ, Vaughan D, Jones D (1997) Rhizosphere carbon flow in trees, in comparison with annual plants: the importance of root exudation and its impact on microbial activity and nutrient availability. Appl Soil Ecol 5:29–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo P, Wang C, Jia Y, Wang Q, Han G, Tian X (2011) Responses of soil microbial biomass and enzymatic activities to fertilizations of mixed inorganic and organic nitrogen at a subtropical forest in East China. Plant Soil 338:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanson WC (1950) The photometric determination of phosphorus in fertilizers using the phosphovanado-molybdate complex. J Sci Food Agric 1:172–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassan HM, Marschner P, McNeil A, Tang C (2012) Growth, P uptake in grain legumes and changes in rhizosphere soil P pools. Biol Fertil Soils 48:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedley MJ, Stewart JWB, Chauhan BS (1982) Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and laboratory incubations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:970–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houlton BZ, Wang YP, Vitousek PM, Field CB (2008) A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere. Nature 454:327–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Huebel F, Beck E (1993) In-situ determination of the P-relations around the primary root of maize with respect to inorganic and phytate-P. Plant Soil 157:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huyghe C (1997) White lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Field Crop Res 53:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jemo M, Abaidoo RC, Nolte C, Tchienkoua M, Sanginga N, Horst WJ (2006) Phosphorus benefits from grain-legume crops to subsequent maize grown on acid soils of Southern Cameroon. Plant Soil 284:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen C, Joernsgaard B, Andersen MN, Christiansen JL, Mogensen VO, Friis P, Petersen CT (2004) The effect of lupins as compared with peas and oats on the yield of the subsequent winter barley crop. Euro J Agron 20:405–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamh M, Horst WJ, Amer F, Mostafa H, Maier P (1999) Mobilization of soil and fertilizer phosphate by cover crops. Plant Soil 211:19–12Google Scholar
  20. Kamh M, Abdou M, Chude V, Wiesler F, Horst WJ (2002) Mobilization of phosphorus contributes to positive rotational effects of leguminous cover crops on maize grown on soils from northern Nigeria. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:566–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Le Bayon RC, Weisskopf L, Martinoia E, Jansa J, Frossard E, Keller F, Follmi KB, Gobat JM (2006) Soil phosphorus uptake by continuously cropped Lupinus albus: a new microcosm design. Plant Soil 283:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li H, Shen J, Zhang F, Marschner P, Cawthray G, Rengel Z (2010) Phosphorus uptake and rhizosphere properties of intercropped and monocropped maize, faba bean, and white lupin in acidic soil. Biol Fertil Soil 46:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analyt Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Negassa W, Leinweber P (2009) How does the Hedley sequential phosphorus fractionation reflect impacts of land use and management on soil phosphorus: a review. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:305–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neumann G, Martinoia E (2002) Cluster roots—an underground adaptation for survival in extreme environments. Trends Plant Sci 7:162–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nuruzzaman M, Lambers H, Bolland MDA, Veneklaas EJ (2005) Phosphorus benefits of different legume crops to subsequent wheat grown in different soils of Western Australia. Plant Soil 271:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nwoke OC, Vanlauwe B, Diels J, Sanginga N, Osounubi O, Merckx R (2003) Assessment of labile phosphorus fractions and adsorption characteristics in relation to soil properties of West African savanna soils. Agr Ecosyst Environ 100:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nziguheba G, Merckx R, Palm CA (2002) Soil phosphorus dynamics and maize response to different rates of phosphorus fertilizer applied to an Acrisol in western Kenya. Plant Soil 243:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olander L, Vitousek PM (2001) Regulation of soil phosphatase and chitinase activity by N and P availability. Biogeochemistry 49:175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Otani T, Ae N, Tanaka H (1996) Phosphorus (P) uptake mechanisms of crops grown in soils with low P status. II. Significance of organic acids in root exudates of pigeon pea. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 42:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pil Y, Mimmo T, Tomasi N, Terzano R, Cesco S, Crecchio C (2015) Microbial interactions in the rhizosphere: beneficial influences of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on nutrient acquisition process. A review. Biol Fertil Soil 51:403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Purnell H (1960) Studies of the family Proteaceae. I. Anatomy and morphology of the roots of some Victorian species. Aust J Bot 8:38–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanchez PA (2002) Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295:2019–2020CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Soil Survey Staff (2006) Keys to soil taxonomy, 10th edn. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. Sugihara S, Funakawa S, Kilasara M, Kosaki T (2010) Effect of land management and soil texture on seasonal variations in soil microbial biomass in dry tropical agroecosystem in Tanzania. Appl Soil Ecol 44:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sugihara S, Funakawa S, Nishigaki M, Kilasara M, Kosaki T (2012) Dynamics of fractionated P and P budget in soil under different land management in two Tanzanian croplands with contrasting soil textures. Agri Ecosyst Environ 162:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tiessen H, Moir JO (1993) Characterization of available phosphorus by sequential extraction. In: Carren MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, Canadian Society of Soil Science. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 75–86Google Scholar
  38. Tiessen H, Salcedo IH, Sampaio EVSB (1992) Nutrient and soil organic matter dynamics under shifting cultivation in semi-arid northeastern Brazil. Agric Ecosys Environ 38:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turner BL, Baxter R, Whitton BA (2002) Seasonal phosphatase activity in three characteristic soils of the English uplands polluted by long-term atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Environ Pollut 120:313–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Valentinuzzi F, Cesco S, Tomasi N, Mimmo T (2015) Influence of different trap solutions on the determination of root exudates in Lupinus albus L. Biol Fertil Soil 51:757–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vance CP (2001) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol 127:390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Vance CP, Uhde-stone C, Allan DL (2003) Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol 157:423–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang Y, Marschner P, Zhang F (2012a) Phosphorus pools and other soil properties in the rhizosphere of wheat and legumes growing in three soils in monoculture or as a mixture of wheat and legume. Plant Soil 354:283–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang Y, Zhang F, Marschner P (2012b) Soil pH is the main factor influencing growth and rhizosphere properties of wheat following different pre-crops. Plant Soil 360:271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wasaki J, Yamamura T, Shinano T, Osaki M (2003) Secreted acid phosphatase is expressed in cluster roots of lupin in response to phosphorus deficiency. Plant Soil 248:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weisskopf L, Abou-Mansour E, Fromin N, Tomasi N, Santelia D, Edelkott I, Neumann G, Aragno M, Tabacchi R, Martinoia E (2006) White lupin has developed a complex strategy to limit microbial degradation of secreted citrate required for phosphate acquisition. Plant Cell Environ 29:919–927CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Weisskopf L, Akello P, Khan ZR, Milleret R, Gobat JM, Le Bayon RC, Schulthess F (2009) White lupin leads to increased maize yield through a soil fertility-independent mechanism: a new candidate for fighting Striga hermonthica infestation? Plant Soil 319:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zheng Z, Parent LE, MacLeod JA (2003) Influence of soil texture on fertilizer and soil phosphorus transformations in Gleysolic soils. Can J Soil Sci 83:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soh Sugihara
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yutaro Tomita
    • 2
  • Tomohiro Nishigaki
    • 2
  • Method Kilasara
    • 3
  • Jun Wasaki
    • 4
  • Shinya Funakawa
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of Urban Environmental ScienceTokyo Metropolitan UniversityHachiojiJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversitySakyokuJapan
  3. 3.Department of Soil ScienceSokoine University of AgricultureMorogoroTanzania
  4. 4.Graduate School of Biosphere ScienceHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations