Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 245–250 | Cite as

Phosphorus availability in soils amended with wheat residue char

  • Mohammed Masud ParvageEmail author
  • Barbro Ulén
  • Jan Eriksson
  • Jeffery Strock
  • Holger Kirchmann
Short Communication


Plant availability and risk for leaching and/or runoff losses of phosphorus (P) from soils depend among others on P concentration in the soil solution. Water-soluble P in soil measures soil solution P concentration. The aim of this study was to understand the effect of wheat residue char (biochar) addition on water-soluble P concentration in a wide range of biochar-amended soils. Eleven agricultural fields representing dominant soil texture classes of Swedish agricultural lands were chosen. Concentrations of water-soluble P in the soils and in biochar were measured prior to biochar incorporation to soils in the laboratory. Experiments with three dominant soil textures—silt loam, clay loam, and an intermediate loam soil with different rates of biochar addition (i.e., 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 %; w/w) showed that the highest concentration of water-soluble P was achieved at an application rate of 1 %. At higher application rates, P concentrations decreased which coincided with a pH increase of 0.3–0.7 units. When the 11 soils were amended with 1 % (w/w) biochar, water-soluble P concentrations increased in most of the soils ranging from 11 to 253 %. However, much of the water-soluble P added through the biochar was retained (33–100 %). We concluded that wheat residue char can act as a source of soluble P, and low and high additions of biochar can have different effects on soil solution P concentration due to possible reactions with Ca and Mg added with biochar.


Biochar Water-soluble phosphorus Phosphorus saturation Phosphorus retention Clay soils Sandy soils 



The project was partly financed by The Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forest research grant.


  1. Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaton JD, Peterson HB, Bauer N (1959) Some aspects of phosphate adsorption by charcoal. Soil Sci Soc Am J 24:340–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beegle D (2005) Assessing soil phosphorus for crop production by soil testing. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN (eds) Phosphorus: agriculture and the environment. Agron Monog No. 46. Madison, Wisconsin, pp 123–143Google Scholar
  4. Brady NC, Weil RR (2002) The nature and properties of soils, 13th edn. Pearson Education Ltd, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown R (2009) Biochar production technology. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 127–146Google Scholar
  6. Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 45:629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen NL (1977) Fire and soil-plant nutrient relations in a pine-wiregrass savanna on the coastal plain of North Carolina. Oecologia 31:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeLuca HT, MacKenzie MD, Gundale MJ (2009) Biochar effects on soil nutrient transformations. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 251–270Google Scholar
  9. Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P (2009) Physical properties of biochar. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 13–32Google Scholar
  10. Egnér H, Riehm H, Domingo WR (1960) Untersuchungen über die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grundlage für die Beurteiling des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. II Chemische Extrationsmethoden zur Phosphor- och Kaliumbestimmung. Kung Lantbruk Annal 26:199–215 (In German)Google Scholar
  11. Erich MS (1991) Agronomic effectiveness of wood ash as a source of phosphorus and potassium. J Environ Qual 20:576–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Etiégni L, Campbell AG (1991) Physical and chemical characteristics of wood ash. Bioresour Technol 37:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO-ISRIC (1990) Guidelines for soil description. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedley M, McLaughlin M (2005) Reactions of phosphate fertilizers and by-products in soil. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN (eds) Phosphorus: agriculture and the environment. Agron Monog No. 46. Madison, WI, pp 181–252Google Scholar
  16. Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iswaran V, Jauhri KS, Sen A (1980) Effect of charcoal, coal and peat on the yield of moong, soybean and pea. Soil Biol Biochem 12:191–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kishimoto S, Sugiura G (1985) Charcoal as a soil conditioner. Intern Achiev Future 5:12–23Google Scholar
  19. KLS (1965) Kungliga Lantbruksstyrelsens kungörelse med (5) bestämmelser för undersökning av jord vid statens lantbrukskemiska kontrollanstalt och lantbrukskemisk kontrollstation och lantbrukskemisk station med av staten fastställda stadgar. Kungl Lantbruk kungör, Nr 1 (In Swedish)Google Scholar
  20. Koopmans GF, Chardon WJ, Van der Salm C (2005) Disturbance of water-extractable phosphorus determination by colloidal particles in a heavy clay soil from the Netherlands. J Environ Qual 34:1446–1450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. LECO Corporation (2003) Organic application note, LECO CN2000 (brochure), St. Joseph, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  22. Lehmann J, Kern D, German L, McCann J, Martins GC, Moreira L (2003) Soil fertility and production potential. In: Lehmann J, Kern DC, Glaser B, Woods WI (eds) Amazonian dark earths: origin, properties, management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 105–124Google Scholar
  23. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizao FJ, Peterson J, Neves EG (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1719–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindsay WL (1979) Chemical equilibria in soils. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Maguire RO, Chardon WJ, Simard RR (2005) Assessing potential environmental impact of soil phosphorus by soil testing. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN (eds) Phosphorus: agriculture and the environment. Agron Monog No. 46. Madison, Wisconsin, pp 145–180Google Scholar
  26. Major J, Steiner C, Downie A, Lehmann J (2009) Biochar effects on nutrient leaching. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 271–287Google Scholar
  27. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analyt Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohno T, Erich MS (1990) Effect of wood ash application on soil pH and soil test nutrient levels. Agri Eco Environ 32:223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parvage MM, Kirchmann H, Kynkäänniemi P, Ulén B (2011) Impact of horse grazing and feeding on phosphorus concentrations in soil and drainage water. Soil Use Manag 27:367–375Google Scholar
  30. Pierzynski GM, McDowell RW, Sims JT (2005) Chemistry, cycling, and potential movement of inorganic phosphorus in soils. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN (eds) Phosphorus: agriculture and the environment. Agron Monog No. 46. Madison, WI, pp 53-86Google Scholar
  31. Pietikäinen J, Kiikkilä O, Fritze H (2000) Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effect on the microbial community of the underlying humus. Oikos 89:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pollak M, Favoino E (2004) Heavy metals and organic compounds from wastes used as organic fertilisers. Accessed 17 May 2011
  33. Rahaman MS, Ellis N, Mavinic DS (2008) Effects of various process parameters on struvite precipitation kinetics and subsequent determination of rate constants. Water Sci Technol 57:647–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rondon MA, Lehmann J, Ramirez J, Hurtado M (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L) increases with bio-char additions. Biol Fertil Soils 43:699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sales BC, Chakoumakos BC, Boatner LA, Ramey JO (1992) Structural evolution of the amorphous solids produced by heating crystalline MgHPO4.3H2O. J Mater Res 7:2646–2649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Self-Davis ML, Moore PA, Joern BC (2000) Determination of water- and/or dilute salt-extractable phosphorus. In: Pierzynski GM (ed) Methods of phosphorus analysis for soils, sediments, residuals, and waters. South Coop Ser Bul 396:24–26Google Scholar
  37. SIS (1997) Soil analysis determination of trace elements in soils extraction with nitric acids: Swedish Standard SS-28311. Swedish Standard Institute (SIS), StockholmGoogle Scholar
  38. Ulén B, Snäll S (2007) Forms and retention of phosphorus in an illite-clay soil profile with a history of fertilisation with pig manure and mineral fertilisers. Geoderma 137:455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ulén B, Djodjic F, Etana A, Johansson G, Lindström J (2010) The need for improved risk index for phosphorus losses to water from tile-drained agricultural land. J Hydrol 400:234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Der Paauw F (1971) An effective water extraction method for the determination of plant-available soil phosphorus. Plant Soil 34:467–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos AC, Van der Velde M, Diafas I (2010) Biochar application to soils—a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes and functions. EUR–Scientific and Technical Research series. ISSN 1018-5593. ISBN 978-92-79-14293Google Scholar
  42. Wang J, Zhang M, Xiong Z, Liu P, Pan G (2011) Effects of biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emmissions from two paddy soils. Biol Fertil Soils 47:887–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yamato M, Okimori Y, Wibowo IF, Anshori S, Ogawa M (2006) Effects of the application of charred bark in Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea, peanut and soil chemical properties in south Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yao H, Campbell CD, Qiao X (2011) Soil pH controls nitrification and carbon substrate utilization more than urea or charcoal in some highly acidic soils. Biol Fertil Soils 47:515–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed Masud Parvage
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barbro Ulén
    • 1
  • Jan Eriksson
    • 1
  • Jeffery Strock
    • 1
    • 2
  • Holger Kirchmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Soil and EnvironmentSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Southwest Research and Outreach CenterUniversity of MinnesotaLambertonUSA

Personalised recommendations