Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 79–87 | Cite as

Variations in concentrations of N and P forms in leachates from dried soils rewetted at different rates

  • Martin S. A. Blackwell
  • Alison M. Carswell
  • Roland Bol
Original Paper


The rate at which dried soils are rewetted can affect the quantities and forms of nutrients in leachates. Both dried and moist replicated (n = 3) samples of two contrasting grassland soil types (clayey vs brown earth) were irrigated during laboratory experiments with identical total amounts of water, but at different rates, ranging from 0 h, increasing by 30-min increments up to 4 h, and additionally a 24-h rewetting rate. Total P concentrations in leachates from dried samples of both soils generally decreased as rewetting rate increased, ranging from 2,923 ± 589 μg P L−1 (0.5 h rewetting rate) to 731 ± 46.0 μg P L−1 (24 h, clayey soil) and 1,588 ± 45.1 μg P L−1 (0.5 h) to 439 ± 25.5 μg P L−1 (24 h brown earth). Similar patterns in concentrations occurred for molybdate reactive P (MRP), although concentrations were generally an order of magnitude lower, indicating that the majority of the leached P was probably organic. The moist brown earth leached relatively high concentrations of MRP (maximum 232 ± 10.6 μg P L−1, 0.5 h), unlike the moist clayey soil (maximum 20.4 ± 10.0 μg P L−1, 0 h). The total oxidised N concentrations in leachates were less affected by rewetting rate, although longer rewetting rates resulted in decreased concentrations in leachates from the dried samples of both soils. The difference in responses to rewetting rates of the two soils is probably due to differences in the fate of the microbial biomass and adsorption properties in the soils. Results show that soil moisture could be an important factor in regulating nutrient losses and availability, especially under changing patterns of rainfall predicted by future climate change scenarios.


Phosphorus Nitrogen Leaching Drying–rewetting Soil microbial biomass 



This work was supported by the Stapledon Memorial Trust Student Vacation Bursary and by funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. Thanks go to Dr Phil Murray for comments on the manuscript and to Mr Andrew Bristow, Mrs Patricia Butler and Ms. Denise Headon for help with the analyses.


  1. Arah JRM (1990) Modelling temporal and spatial variability of denitrification. Biol Fert Soils 9:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birch HF, Friend MT (1958) The organic matter and nitrogen status of E. African soils. Nature 178:500. doi: 10.1038/178500a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackwell MSA, Brookes PC, de la Fuente-Martinez N, Murray PJ, Snars KE, Williams JK, Haygarth PM (2009) Effects of soil drying and rate of rewetting on phosphorus in leachate. Biol Fert Soils 45:635–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bottner P (1985) Response of microbial biomass to alternate moist and dry conditions in a soil incubated with 14 C- and 15 N-labelled plant material. Soil Biol Biochem 17:329–337. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(85)90070-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brookes PC, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1982) Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 14:319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bushby HVA, Marshall KC (1977) Desiccation-induced damage to the cell envelope of root nodule bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 9:149–152. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(77)90066-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butterly CR, McNeill AM, Baldock JA, Marschner P (2011a) Changes in water content of two agricultural soils does not alter labile P and C pools. Plant Soil 348:185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butterly CR, McNeill AM, Baldock JA, Marschner P (2011b) Rapid changes in carbon and phosphorus after rewetting of a dry soil. Biol Fert Soils 47:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chao WL, Alexander M (1984) Mineral soils as carriers for Rhizobium inoculants. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:94–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ciardi C, Ceccanti B, Nannipieri P, Casella S, Toffanin A (1993) Effects of various treatments on contents of adenine nucleotides and RNA of Mediterranean soils. Soil Biol Biochem 25:739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cochran WG, Cox GM (1950) Experimental designs. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. De Nobili M, Contin M, Brookes PC (2006) Microbial biomass dynamics in recently air-dried and rewetted soils compared to others stored air-dry for up to 103 years. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2871–2881. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.04.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fierer N, Schimel JP (2002) Effects of drying–rewetting frequency on soil carbon and nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol Biochem 34:777–787. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00007-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fierer N, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2003) Influence of drying–rewetting frequency on soil bacterial community structure. Microb Ecol 45:63–71. doi: 10.1007/s00248-002-1007-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2006) FAOSTAT Online Statistical Service. Rome: FAO. Available online at:
  16. Franzluebbers K, Meaver RW, Juo ASR, Franzluebbers AJ (1994) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization from cowpea plants part decomposing in moist and in repeatedly dried and wetted soil. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1379–1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franzluebbers AL, Haney RL, Honeycutt CW, Schomberg HH, Hons FM (2000) Flush of carbon dioxide following rewetting of dried soil relates to active organic pools. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:613–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gordon H, Haygarth PM, Bardgett RD (2008) Drying and rewetting effects on soil microbial community composition and nutrient leaching. Soil Biol Biochem 40:302–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gregorich EG, Liang BC, Drury CF, Mackenzie AF, McGill WB (2000) Elucidation of the source and turnover of water soluble and microbial biomass carbon in agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 32:581–587. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00146-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halverson LJ, Jones TM, Firestone MK (2000) Release of intracellular solutes by four soil bacteria exposed to dilution stress. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1630–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrod TR, Hogan DV (2008) The soils of North Wyke and Rowden. Revised edition of Harrod TR (1981) Soils in Devon IV: Sheet SS61 (Chulmleigh). Soil Survey Rec No 70. Available at
  22. Haygarth PM, Warwick MS, House WA (1997) Size distribution of colloidal molybdate reactive phosphorus in river waters and soil solution. Water Res 31:439–442. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00270-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haygarth PM, Hepworth L, Jarvis SC (1998) Forms of phosphorus transfer in hydrological pathways from soil under grazed grassland. Eur J Soil Sci 49:65–72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.00131.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kempers AJ, Luft AG (1988) Re-examination of the determination of environmental nitrate as nitrite by reduction with hydrazine. Analyst 113:1117–1120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kieft TL, Soroker E, Firestone MK (1987) Microbial biomass response to a rapid increase in water potential when dry soil is wetted. Soil Biol Biochem 19:119–126. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90070-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liang B, Yang X, He X, Zhou J (2011) Effects of 17-year fertilization on soil microbial biomass C and N and soluble organic C and N in loessial soil during maize growth. Biol Fert Soils 47:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller AE, Schimel JP, Meixner T, Sickman JO, Melack JM (2005) Episodic rewetting enhances carbon and nitrogen release from chaparral soils. Soil Biol Biochem 37:2195–2204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ministry for Agriculture Fisheries and Food (1986) Method 32: pH and lime requirement of mineral soil. The analysis of agricultural materials. A manual of the analytical methods used by the Agricultural Development and Advisory Service. Reference book 427. Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London 98–101Google Scholar
  29. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murphy DV, Sparling GP, Fillery IRP, McNeill AM, Braunberger P (1998) Mineralisation of soil organic nitrogen and microbial respiration after summer rainfall events in an agricultural soil. Aust J Soil Res 36:231–246. doi: 10.1071/S97043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circ No. 939 USDA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1976) The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—II. Gamma irradiation, autoclaving, airdrying and fumigation. Soil Biol Biochem 8:179–188. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(76)90002-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roberson EB, Firestone MK (1992) Relationship between desiccation and exopolysaccharide production in soil Pseudomonas spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1284–1291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rowland AP, Haygarth PM (1997) Determination of total dissolved phosphorus in soil solutions. J Environ Qual 26:410–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Searle PL (1984) The berthelot or indophenol reaction and its use in the analytical chemistry of nitrogen. Analyst 109:549–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sexstone AJ, Revsbech NP, Parkin TB, Tiedje JM (1985) Direct measurement of oxygen profiles and denitrification rates in soil aggregates. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:645–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Snars KE, Swain A, Brookes PC, Blackwell MSA, Murray PJ, Williams J, Haygarth PM (2006) Modification to fumigation–extraction to permit better analysis of field soils and ease of measurement. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Phosphorus Dynamics in the Soil–Plant Continuum, Uberlandia, Brazil, 14–19 May 2006, Embrapa Milho e Sorgo, Set Lagoas, MG, Brazil, pp 64–66Google Scholar
  38. Soulides DA, Allison FE (1961) Effect of drying and freezing soils on carbon dioxide production, available mineral nutrients, aggregation and bacterial population. Soil Sci 91:291–298. doi: 10.1097/00010694-196105000-00001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sparling GP, Murphy DV, Thompson RB, Fillery IRP (1995) Short-term net mineralization from plant residues and gross and net N mineralization from soil organic-matter after rewetting of a seasonally dry soil. Aust J Soil Res 33:961–973. doi: 10.1071/SR9950961 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. The World Bank (2006) Reengaging in agricultural water management; challenges and options. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner BL, Haygarth PM (2001) Phosphorus solubilization in rewetted soils. Nature 411:258. doi: 10.1038/35077146 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner BL, Driessen JP, Haygarth PM, McKelvie ID (2003) Potential contribution of lysed bacterial cells to phosphorus solubilisation in two rewetted Australian pasture soils. Soil Biol Biochem 35:187–189. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00244-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Gestel M, Merckx R, Vlassak K (1993) Microbial biomass responses to soil drying and rewetting—the fate of fast-growing and slow-growing microorganisms in soils from different climates. Soil Biol Biochem 25:109–123. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90249-B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. West AW, Sparling GP, Feltham CW, Reynolds J (1992) Microbial activity and survival in soils dried at different rates. Aust J Soil Res 30:209–222. doi: 10.1071/SR9920209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wild A (1988) Russell's soil conditions and plant growth, 11th edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  47. Withers PJA, Haygarth PM (2007) Agriculture, phosphorus and eutrophication: a European perspective. Soil Use Manage 23:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin S. A. Blackwell
    • 1
  • Alison M. Carswell
    • 1
  • Roland Bol
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Rothamsted ResearchOkehamptonUK
  2. 2.Terrestrial Biogeochemistry Group, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Agrosphere (IBG-3)Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbHJülichGermany

Personalised recommendations