Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 48, Issue 7, pp 797–805 | Cite as

Elevated CO2 did not mitigate the effect of a short-term drought on biological soil crusts

  • Timothy M. WertinEmail author
  • Susan L. Phillips
  • Sasha C. Reed
  • Jayne Belnap
Original Paper


Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are critical components of arid and semi-arid ecosystems that contribute significantly to carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) fixation, water retention, soil stability, and seedling recruitment. While dry-land ecosystems face a number of environmental changes, our understanding of how biocrusts may respond to such perturbation remains notably poor. To determine the effect that elevated CO2 may have on biocrust composition, cover, and function, we measured percent soil surface cover, effective quantum yield, and pigment concentrations of naturally occurring biocrusts growing in ambient and elevated CO2 at the desert study site in Nevada, USA, from spring 2005 through spring 2007. During the experiment, a year-long drought allowed us to explore the interacting effects that elevated CO2 and water availability may have on biocrust cover and function. We found that, regardless of CO2 treatment, precipitation was the major regulator of biocrust cover. Drought reduced moss and lichen cover to near-zero in both ambient and elevated CO2 plots, suggesting that elevated CO2 did not alleviate water stress or increase C fixation to levels sufficient to mitigate drought-induced reduction in cover. In line with this result, lichen quantum yield and soil cyanobacteria pigment concentrations appeared more strongly dependent upon recent precipitation than CO2 treatment, although we did find evidence that, when hydrated, elevated CO2 increased lichen C fixation potential. Thus, an increase in atmospheric CO2 may only benefit biocrusts if overall climate patterns shift to create a wetter soil environment.


Biological soil crust Collema spp Cyanobacteria Drought Elevated CO2 Global climate change Syntrichia spp 



We would like to thank Mandy Turner for her field leadership and hard work. Additionally, we would like to thank Melody Bourret, Matt van Scoyoc, Adam Collins, and Tonya Troxler for their assistance gathering data in the field. We would like to thank Drs. Erika Geiger, Matt Bowker, and Ferran Garcia-Pichel for assistance in editing. This work was funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Ecosystems Program. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.


  1. Aguilar AJ, Huber-Sannwald E, Belnap J, Smart DR, Moreno JTA (2009) Biological soil crusts exhibit a dynamic response to seasonal rain and release from grazing with implications for soil stability. J Arid Environ 73:1158–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barger NN, Belnap J, Ojima DS, Mosier A (2005) NO gas loss from biologically crusted soils in Canyonlands National Park, Utah. Biogeochem 75:373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belnap J (2006) The potential roles of biological soil crusts in dryland hydrologic cycles. Hydrol Process 20:3159–3178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belnap J, Eldridge D (2003) Disturbance and recovery of biological soil crusts. In: Belnap J, Lange OL (eds) Biological soil crusts: structure, function, and management. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belnap J, Lange OL (2003) Biological soil crusts: structure, function, and management. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Belnap J, Phillips SL, Miller ME (2004) Response of desert biological soil crusts to alterations in precipitation frequency. Oecologia 141:306–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belnap J, Phillips SL, Troxler T (2006) Soil lichen and moss cover and species richness can be highly dynamic: the effects of invasion by the annual exotic grass Bromus tectorum, precipitation, and temperature on biological soil crusts in SE Utah. Appl Soil Ecol 32:63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belnap J, Phillips SL, Smith SD (2007) Dynamics of cover, UV-protective pigments, and quantum yield in biological soil crust communities of an undisturbed Mojave Desert shrubland. Flora 202:674–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilger W, Schreiber U, Bock M (1995) Determination of the quantum efficiency of photosystem-II and of nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in the field. Oecologia 102:425–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Botting RS, Fredeen AL (2006) Net ecosystem CO2 exchange for moss and lichen dominated forest floors of old-growth sub-boreal spruce forests in central British Columbia. Canada Ecol Manage 235:240–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowker MA, Reed SC, Belnap J, Phillips SL (2002) Temporal variation in community composition, pigmentation, and F v/F m of desert cyanobacterial soil crusts. Microb Ecol 43:13–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowker MA, Mau RL, Maestre FT, Escolar C, Castillo-Monroy AP (2011) Functional profiles reveal unique ecological roles of various biological soil crust organisms. Funct Ecol 25:787–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brostoff WN, Sharifi MR, Rundel PW (2005) Photosynthesis of cryptobiotic soil crusts in a seasonally inundated system of pans and dunes in the western Mojave Desert, CA: field studies. Flora 200:592–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castillo-Monroy AP, Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Rodriguez-Echeverria S, Martinez I, Barraza-Zepeda CE, Escolar C (2011) Relationships between biological soil crusts, bacterial diversity and abundance, and ecosystem functioning: Insights from a semi-arid Mediterranean environment. J Veg Sci 22:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli RK, Kwon W-T, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns L, Menéndez CG, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 887–926Google Scholar
  16. Coe KK, Belnap J, Grote EE, Sparks JP (2011) Physiological ecology of the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Czerny J, Ramos JBE, Riebesell U (2009) Influence of elevated CO2 concentrations on cell division and nitrogen fixation rates in the bloom-forming cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena. Biogeosciences 6:1865–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dillon JG, Miller SR, Castenholz RW (2003) UV-acclimation responses in natural populations of cyanobacteria (Calothrix sp.). Environ Microbiol 5:473–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans RD, Belnap J (1999) Long-term consequences of disturbance on nitrogen dynamics in an arid ecosystem. Ecol 80:150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans RD, Ehleringer JR (1993) A break in the nitrogen cycle in aridlands—evidence from delta N15 of soils. Oecologia 94:314–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischlin A, Midgley GF GF, Price JT, Leemans R, Gopal B, Turley C, Rounsevell MDA, Dube OP, Tarazona J, Velichko AA (2007) Ecosystmes, their properties, goods, and services. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Foden W, Midgley GF, Hughes G, Bond WJ, Thuiller W, Hoffman MT, Kaleme P, Underhill LG, Rebelo A, Hannah L (2007) A changing climate is eroding the geographical range of the Namib Desert tree Aloe through population declines and dispersal lags. Divers Distrib 13:645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fu FX, Warner ME, Zhang YH, Feng YY, Hutchins DA (2007) Effects of increased temperature and CO2 on photosynthesis, growth, and elemental ratios in marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus (Cyanobacteria). J Phycol 43:485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garcia-Pichel F, Sherry ND, Castenholz RW (1992) Evidence for an ultraviolet sunscreen role of the extracellular pigment scytonemin in the terrestrial cyanobacterium Chlorogloiopsis sp. Photochem Photobiol 56:17–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grote EE, Belnap J, Housman DC, Sparks JP (2010) Carbon exchange in biological soil crust communities under differential temperatures and soil water contents: implications for global change. Glob Change Biol 16:2763–2774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huxman TE, Smith SD (2001) Photosynthesis in an invasive grass and native forb at elevated CO2 during an El Nino year in the Mojave Desert. Oecologia 128:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jauhiainen J, Silvola J (1999) Photosynthesis of Sphagnum fuscum at long-term raised CO2 concentrations. Ann Bot Fenn 36:11–19Google Scholar
  28. Jeffries DL, Link SO, Klopatek JM (1993) CO2 fluxes of cryptogamic crusts. 1. Response to resaturation. New Phytol 125:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jordan DN, Zitzer SF, Hendrey GR, Lewin KF, Nagy J, Nowak RS, Smith SD, Coleman JS, Seeman JR (1999) Biotic, abiotic and performance aspects of the Nevada Desert Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) Facility. Glob Change Biol 5:659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karsten U, GarciaPichel F (1996) Carotenoids and mycosporine-like amino acid compounds in members of the genus Microcoleus (Cyanobacteria): a chemosystematic study. Syst Appl Microb 19:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lange OL, Meyer A, Zellner H, Heber U (1994) Photosynthesis and water relations of lichen soil crusts—field measurements in the coastal fog zone of the Namib Desert. Funct Ecol 8:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lange OL, Belnap J, Reichenberger H, Meyer A (1997) Photosynthesis of green algal soil crust lichens from arid lands in southern Utah, USA: role of water content on light and temperature responses of CO2 exchange. Flora 192:1–15Google Scholar
  33. Lange OL, Belnap J, Reichenberger H (1998) Photosynthesis of the cyanobacterial soil-crust lichen Collema tenax from arid lands in southern Utah, USA: role of water content on light and temperature responses of CO2 exchange. Funct Ecol 12:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li XR, Tian F, Jia RL, Zhang ZS, Liu LC (2010a) Do biological soil crusts determine vegetation changes in sandy deserts? Implications for managing artificial vegetation. Hydrol Process 24:3621–3630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Y, Wang ZB, Xu TH, Tu WF, Liu C, Zhang YM, Yang CH (2010b) Reorganization of photosystem II is involved in the rapid photosynthetic recovery of desert moss Syntrichia caninervis upon rehydration. J Plant Physiol 167:1390–1397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lioubimtseva E (2004) Climate change in arid environments: revisiting the past to understand the future. Prog Phys Geog 28:502–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lioubimtseva E, Adams JM (2004) Possible implications of increased carbon dioxide levels and climate change for desert ecosystems. Environ Manag 33:S388–S404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malcolm JR, Liu CR, Neilson RP, Hansen L, Hannah L (2006) Global warming and extinctions of endemic species from biodiversity hotspots. Conserv Biol 20:538–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Musil CF, Van Heerden PDR, Cilliers CD, Schmiedel U (2009) Mild experimental climate warming induces metabolic impairment and massive mortalities in southern African quartz field succulents. Environ Exp Bot 66:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oliver MJ, Wood AJ, O'Mahony P (1997) How some plants recover from vegetative desiccation: a repair based strategy. Acta Physiol Plant 19:419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pressel S, Duckett JG, Ligrone R, Proctor MCF (2009) Effects of de- and rehydration in desiccation-tolerant liverworts: a cytological and physiological study. Int J Plant Sci 170:182–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reid WV, Mooney HA, Cropper A, Capistrano D, Carpenter SR, Chopra K, Dasgupta P, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Hassan R, Kasperson R, Leemans R, May RM, McMichael AJ, Pingali P, Samper C, Scholes R, Watson RT, Zakri AH, Shidong Z, Ash NJ, Bennett E, Kumar P, Lee MJ, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Simons H, Thonell J, Zurek MB (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, District of ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  43. Rogers SL, Burns RG (1994) Changes in aggregate stability, nutrient status, indigenous microbial populations, and seedling emergence following inoculation of soil with Nostoc muscorum. Biol Fert Soils 18:209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stark LR, Brinda JC, McLetchie DN (2011) Effects of increased summer precipitation and N deposition on Mojave Desert populations of the biological crust moss Syntrichia caninervis. J Arid Environ 75:457–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Su YG, Li XR, Cheng YW, Tan HJ, Jia RL (2007) Effects of biological soil crusts on emergence of desert vascular plants in North China. Plant Ecol 191:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Su YG, Li XR, Zheng JG, Huang G (2009) The effect of biological soil crusts of different successional stages and conditions on the germination of seeds of three desert plants. J Arid Environ 73:931–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Toet S, Cornelissen JHC, Aerts R, van Logtestijn RSP, de Beus M, Stoevelaar R (2006) Moss responses to elevated CO2 and variation in hydrology in a temperate lowland peatland. Plant Ecol 182:27–40Google Scholar
  48. Tuba Z, Csintalan Z, Szente K, Nagy Z, Grace J (1998) Carbon gains by desiccation-tolerant plants at elevated CO2. Funct Ecol 12:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Warren SD (2003) Synopsis: influence of biological soil crusts on arid land hydrology and soil stability. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag (outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy M. Wertin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Susan L. Phillips
    • 2
  • Sasha C. Reed
    • 1
  • Jayne Belnap
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveySouthwest Biological Science CenterMoabUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyForest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science CenterCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations