Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 511–517

Soil biochemical activities and the geometric mean of enzyme activities after application of sewage sludge and sewage sludge biochar to soil

  • J. Paz-Ferreiro
  • G. Gascó
  • B. Gutiérrez
  • A. Méndez
Original Paper

Abstract

There is a need to improve the way in which wastes, such as sewage sludges, are managed and a potential way to proceed would be to transform them into biochar. On the other hand, there is a growing interest in the use of soil biochemical properties as indicators of soil quality because they are sensitive to alterations in soil management. Thus, we have studied the effect of a biochar obtained from sewage sludge on soil biochemical properties in an organic soil using two doses of biochar and comparing these results with the control soil and with soils amended with the same two doses of unpyrolyzed sewage sludge. Microbial biomass C, soil respiration, net N mineralization and several enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, phosphomoesterase and arylsulphatase) were monitored. The geometric mean of enzyme activities (GMea) was used as a soil quality index. Individual biochemical properties showed a different response to the treatments, while GMea showed an increase in the quality of soils amended with the high biochar dose and a decrease in those amended with a high sewage sludge dose. The geometric mean of enzyme activities was a suitable index to condense the whole set of soil enzyme values in a single numerical value, which was sensitive to management practices.

Keywords

Biochar Soil quality Soil enzymes Sewage sludge Forest soils Soil biochemical properties 

Supplementary material

374_2011_644_MOESM1_ESM.doc (48 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 47 kb)

References

  1. Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey VL, Fansler SJ, Smith JL, Bolton H (2011) Reconciling apparent variability in effects of biochar amendment on soil enzyme activities by assay optimization. Soil Biol Biochem 43:296–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastida F, Zsolnay A, Hernández T, García C (2008) Past, present and future of soil quality indices: a biological perspective. Geoderma 147:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bridle TR, Pritchard D (2004) Energy and nutrient recovery from sewage sludge via pyrolysis. Water Sci Tech 50:69–175Google Scholar
  5. Camiña F, Trasar-Cepeda C, Gil-Sotres F, Leirós MC (1998) Measurement of dehydrogenase activity in acid soils rich in organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1005–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castaldi S, Rutigliano FA, Virzo de Santo A (2004) Suitability of soil microbial parameters as indicators of heavy metal pollution. Water Air Soil Poll 158:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chander K, Brookes PC (1991) Is the dehydrogenase assay invalid as a method to estimate microbial activity in copper-contaminated soils? Soil Biol Biochem 23:909–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Day PR (1965) Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In: Black CA, Evans DD, White JL, Ensminger LE, Clark FE (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 1, physical and mineralogical properties. Including statistics of measurement and sampling. ASA-SSSA, Madison, pp 545–567Google Scholar
  9. Egiarte G, Pinto M, Ruiz-Romera E, Camps Arbestain M (2008) Monitoring heavy metal concentrations in leachates from a forest soil subjected to repeated applications of sewage sludge. Environ Poll 156:840–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission (2008) European Commission, environmental, economic and social impacts of the use of sewage sludge on land, Final report part I: overview reportGoogle Scholar
  11. Fliessbach A, Martens R, Reber HH (1994) Soil microbial biomass and activity in soils treated with heavy metal contaminated sewage sludge. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1201–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. García-Ruiz R, Ochoa V, Hinojosa MB, Carreira JA (2008) Suitability of enzyme activities for the monitoring of soil quality improvement in organic agricultural systems. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2137–2145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. García-Ruiz R, Ochoa V, Viñegla B, Hinojosa MB, Peña-Santiago R, Liébanas G, Linares JC, Carreira JA (2009) Soil enzymes, nematode community and selected physico-chemical properties as soil quality indicators in organic and conventional olive oil farming: influence of seasonality and site features. Appl Soil Ecol 41:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gascó G, Paz-Ferreiro J, Méndez A (in press) Thermal analysis of soil amended with sewage sludge and biochar from sewage sludge pyrolysis. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. doi:10.1007/s10973-011-2116-2
  15. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gómez-Rico MF, Font R, Vera J, Fuentes D, Disante K, Cortina J (2008) Degradation of organic pollutants in Mediterranean forest soils amended with sewage sludge. Chemosphere 71:2129–2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gundale MJ, DeLuca TH (2006) Temperature and substrate influence the chemical properties of charcoal in the ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir ecosystem. Forest Ecol Manag 231:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hallett RA, Bowden WB, Smith CT (1999) Nitrogen dynamics in forest soils after municipal sludge additions. Water Air Soil Poll 112:259–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinojosa MB, García-Ruíz R, Viñegla B, Carreira JA (2004) Microbiological rates and enzyme activities as indicators of functionality in soils affected by the Aznalcóllar toxic spill. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1637–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joseph SD, Camps-Arbestain M, Lin Y, Munroe P, Chia CH, Hook J, Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Cowie A, Singh BP, Lehmann J, Foidl N, Smernik RJ, Amonette JE (2010) An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Aust J Soil Res 48:501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan M, Scullion J (2000) Effect of soil on microbial responses to metal contamination. Environ Poll 110:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuzyakov Y, Subbotina I, Chen H, Bogomolova I, Xu X (2009) Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14 C labelling. Soil Biol Biochem 41:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL (2010a) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laird D, Fleming P, Wang B, Horton R, Karlen D (2010b) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lammirato C, Miltner A, Kaestner M (2011) Effects of wood char and activated carbon on the hydrolysis of cellobiose by β-glucosidase from Aspergillus niger. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1936–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lehmann J, da Silva JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  28. Lehmann J, Rillig M, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang B, Lehmann J, Sohi SP, Thies JE, O’Neill B, Trujillo L, Gaunt J, Solomon D, Grossman J, Neves EG, Luizão FJ (2010) Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in soil. Org Geochem 41:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martens DA, Johanson JB, Frankenberger WT Jr (1992) Production and persistence of soil enzymes with repeated addition of organic residues. Soil Sci 153:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marzadori C, Ciavatta C, Montecchio D, Gessa C (1996) Effects of lead pollution on different soil enzyme activities. Biol Fertil Soils 22:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Méndez A, Barriga S, Fidalgo JM, Gascó G (2009) Adsorbent materials from paper industry waste materials and their use in Cu(II) removal from water. J Hazard Mater 165:736–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Méndez A, Gascó G (2005) Optimization of water desalination using carbon-based adsorbents. Desalination 183:249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54:655–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Grego S (1990) Ecological significance of biological activity in soil. In: Bollag JM, Stotzky G (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol 6. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 293–355Google Scholar
  36. Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P (2002) Enzyme activities and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. In: Burns RG, Dick RP (eds) Enzymes in the environment. Activity, ecology and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  37. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Bigham JM (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, pp 961–1010Google Scholar
  38. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW, Laird DA, Ahmedna MA, Niandou MAS (2010) Short-term CO2 mineralization after additions of biochar and switchgrass to a Typic Kandiudult. Geoderma 154:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paz-Ferreiro J, Trasar-Cepeda C, Leirós MC, Seoane S, Gil-Sotres F (2007) Biochemical properties of acid soils under native grassland in a temperate humid zone. New Zeal J Agr Res 50:537–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paz-Ferreiro J, Trasar-Cepeda C, Leirós MC, Seoane S, Gil-Sotres F (2009) Biochemical properties in managed grassland soils in a temperate humid zone: modifications of soil quality as a consequence of intensive grassland use. Biol Fertil Soils 45:711–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paz-Ferreiro J, Trasar-Cepeda C, Leirós MdC, Seoane S, Gil-Sotres F (2011) Intra-annual variation in biochemical properties and the biochemical equilibrium of different grassland soils under contrasting management and climate. Biol Fertil Soils 47:633–645Google Scholar
  42. Rhoades JD (1996) Methods of soil analysis: part 3. In: Bigham JM (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, pp 417–435Google Scholar
  43. Saviozzi A, Cardelli E, Din Puccio R (2011) Impact of salinity on soil biological activities: a laboratory experiment. Commu Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:258–367Google Scholar
  44. Serra-Wittling C, Houot S, Barriuso E (1996) Modification of soil water retention and biological properties by municipal solid waste compost. Compost Sci Util 4:44–52Google Scholar
  45. Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL (2010) Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Aus J Soil Res 48:516–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996) Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Bigham JM (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, pp 1201–1229Google Scholar
  47. Thomas GW (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Bigham JM (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. ASA-SSSA, Madison, pp 475–489Google Scholar
  48. Uchimiya M, Wartelle LH, Klasson KT, Fortier CA, Lima IM (2011) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on biochar property and function as a heavy metal sorbent in soil. J Agr Food Chem 59:2501–2510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. USEPA (1997) Method 3051a: microwave assisted acid dissolution of sediments, sludges, soils, and oils, 2nd edn. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  50. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DJ (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wardle DA, Ghani A (1995) A critique of the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO2) as a bioindicator of disturbance and ecosystem development. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1601–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zimmerman AR, Gao B, Ahn M-Y (2011) Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Paz-Ferreiro
    • 1
  • G. Gascó
    • 1
  • B. Gutiérrez
    • 1
  • A. Méndez
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Edafología, ETSI AgrónomosUPMMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ingeniería de materiales, ETSI MinasUPMMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations