Advertisement

Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 271–284 | Cite as

Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil

  • Shelby Rajkovich
  • Akio Enders
  • Kelly Hanley
  • Charles Hyland
  • Andrew R. Zimmerman
  • Johannes LehmannEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The effects of biochar properties on crop growth are little understood. Therefore, biochar was produced from eight feedstocks and pyrolyzed at four temperatures (300°C, 400°C, 500°C, 600°C) using slow pyrolysis. Corn was grown for 46 days in a greenhouse pot trial on a temperate and moderately fertile Alfisol amended with the biochar at application rates of 0.0%, 0.2%, 0.5%, 2.0%, and 7.0% (w/w) (equivalent to 0.0, 2.6, 6.5, 26, and 91 t biochar ha−1) and full recommended fertilization. Animal manure biochars increased biomass by up to 43% and corn stover biochar by up to 30%, while food waste biochar decreased biomass by up to 92% in relation to similarly fertilized controls (all P < 0.05). Increasing the pyrolysis temperature from 300°C to 600°C decreased the negative effect of food waste as well as paper sludge biochars. On average, plant growth was the highest with additions of biochar produced at a pyrolysis temperature of 500°C (P < 0.05), but feedstock type caused eight times more variation in growth than pyrolysis temperature. Biochar application rates above 2.0% (w/w) (equivalent to 26 t ha−1) did generally not improve corn growth and rather decreased growth when biochars produced from dairy manure, paper sludge, or food waste were applied. Crop N uptake was 15% greater than the fully fertilized control (P < 0.05, average at 300°C) at a biochar application rate of 0.2% but decreased with greater application to 16% below the N uptake of the control at an application rate of 7%. Volatile matter or ash content in biochar did not correlate with crop growth or N uptake (P > 0.05), and greater pH had only a weak positive relationship with growth at intermediate application rates. Greater nutrient contents (N, P, K, Mg) improved growth at low application rates of 0.2% and 0.5%, but Na reduced growth at high application rates of 2.0% and 7.0% in the studied fertile Alfisol.

Keywords

Biochar Black carbon Corn Nitrogen uptake Sodium 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the support by the Cornell Presidential Scholarship to S.R., by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA Agreement 9891), by the USDA Hatch grant, and partial support by the National Science Foundation’s Basic Research for Enabling Agricultural Development (NSF-BREAD grant number IOS-0965336). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the donors. We thank Elena Miller-ter-Kuile for the help in conducting the experiment; several individuals who allowed us to conduct experiments with their biochars, specifically Michael Antal, BEST Energies, Akwasi Boateng, Sergio Capareda, Chee Chia, Dynamotive, Bob Hawkins, Stephen Joseph, and Jerome Matthews; and several anonymous referees for their valuable comments.

Supplementary material

374_2011_624_MOESM1_ESM.doc (337 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 337 kb)

References

  1. Amonette JE, Joseph S (2009) Characteristics of biochar: microchemical properties. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, London, pp 33–52Google Scholar
  2. Antal MJ, Grønli M (2003) The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:1619–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonelli PR, Della Rocca PA, Cerrella EG, Cukierman AL (2010) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on composition, surface properties and thermal degradation rates of Brazil Nut shells. Biores Technol 76:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bridle TR, Pritchard D (2004) Energy and nutrient recovery from sewage sludge via pyrolysis. Water Sci Technol 50:169–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brockhoff SR, Christians NE, Killorn RJ, Horton R, Davis DD (2010) Physical and mineral-nutrition properties of sand-based turfgrass root zones amended with biochar. Agron J 102:1627–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan KY, Xu Z (2009) Biochar: nutrient properties and their enhancement. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management. Earthscan, London, pp 67–84Google Scholar
  7. Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Austr J Soil Res 45:629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Austr J Soil Res 46:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Shinogi Y, Taira M (2010) Influence of biochar use on sugarcane growth, soil parameters, and groundwater quality. Austr J Soil Res 48:526–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devonald VG (1982) The effect of wood charcoal on the growth and nodulation of garden peas in pot culture. Plant Soil 66:125–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elad Y, Rav David D, Meller Harel Y, Borenshtein M, Ben Kalifa H, Silber A, Graber ER (2010) Induction of systemic resistance in plants by biochar, a soil-applied carbon sequestering agent. Phytopathology 100:913–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elmer WH, Pignatello JJ (2011) Effect of biochar amendments on mycorrhizal associations and Fusarium crown and root rot of asparagus in replant soils. Plant Dis 95:960–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enders A, Lehmann J (2011) Comparison of wet digestion and dry ashing methods for total elemental analysis of biochar. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Fortmeier R, Schubert S (1995) Salt tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.): the role of sodium exclusion. Plant Cell Env 18:1041–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaskin JW, Speir RA, Harris K, Das KC, Lee RD, Morris LA, Fisher DS (2010) Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Agron J 102:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graber ER, Harel YM, Kolton M, Cytryn E, Silber A, David DR, Tsechansky L, Borenshtein M, Elad Y (2010) Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media. Plant Soil 337:481–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hidetoshi A, Benjamin SK, Haefele SM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Res 111:81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimetu J, Lehmann J, Ngoze S, Mugendi D, Kinyangi J, Riha S, Verchot L, Recha J, Pell A (2008) Reversibility of soil productivity decline with organic matter of differing quality along a degradation gradient. Ecosystems 11:726–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kishimoto S, Sugiura G (1985) Charcoal as a soil conditioner. In: Symposium on Forest Products Research, International Achievements for the Future, vol 5, pp 12/23/1-12/23/15Google Scholar
  20. Kuzyakov Y, Subbotina I, Chen H, Bogomolova I, Xu X (2009) Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biol Biochem 41:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehmann J, Kern DC, German LA, McCann J, Martins GC, Moreira A (2003a) Soil fertility and production potential. In: Lehmann J, Kern DC, Glaser B, Woods WI (eds) Amazonian dark earths: origin, properties management. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 105–124Google Scholar
  22. Lehmann J, da Silva Jr JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003b) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lehmann J, Amonette JE, Roberts K (2010) Role of biochar in mitigation of climate change. In: Hillel D, Rosenzweig C (eds) Handbook of climate change and agroecosystems: impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Imperial College Press, London, pp 343–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehmann J, Rillig M, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizão FJ, Petersen J, Neves EG (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1719–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Major J, Rondon M, Molina D, Riha S, Lehmann J (2010) Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant Soil 333:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Makoto K, Choi D, Hashidoko Y, Koike T (2011) The growth of Larix gmelinii seedlings as affected by charcoal produced at two different temperatures. Biol Fert Soils 47:467–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nguyen B, Lehmann J, Hockaday WC, Joseph S, Masiello CA (2010) Temperature sensitivity of black carbon decomposition and oxidation. Environ Sci Technol 44:3324–3331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nieder R, Benbi DK, Scherer HW (2011) Fixation and defixation of ammonium in soils: a review. Biol Fert Soils 47:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parton W, Silver WL, Burke IC, Grassens L, Harmon ME, Currie WS, King JY, Adair EC, Brandt LA, Hart SC, Fasth B (2007) Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315:361–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rondon M, Lehmann J, Ramírez J, Hurtado M (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions. Biol Fert Soils 43:699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spokas KA, Baker JM, Reicosky DC (2010) Ethylene: potential key for biochar amendment impacts. Plant Soil 333:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls T, de Macedo JLV, Blum WEH, Zech W (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Blum WEH, Zech W (2008a) Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central Amazonian Ferralsol amended with compost and charcoal. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:893–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steiner C, Das KC, Garcia M, Förster B, Zech W (2008b) Charcoal and smoke extract stimulate the soil microbial community in a highly weathered xanthic Ferralsol. Pedobiologia 51:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taghizadeh-Toosi A, Clough TJ, Condron LM, Sherlock RR, Anderson CR, Craigie RA (2011) Biochar incorporation into pasture soil suppresses in situ nitrous oxide emissions from ruminant urine patches. J Environ Qual 40:468–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tryon EH (1948) Effect of charcoal on certain physical, chemical, and biological properties of forest soils. Ecol Monogr 18:81–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. USDA (1965) Soil Survey—Tompkins County. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2010a) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Downie A, Morris S, Petty S, Rust J, Chan KY (2010b) A glasshouse study on the interaction of low mineral ash biochar with nitrogen in a sandy soil. Austr J Soil Res 48:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yamato M, Okimori Y, Wibowo IF, Anshori S, Ogawa M (2006) Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yeboah E, Ofori P, Quansah GW, Dugan E, Sohi SP (2009) Improving soil productivity through biochar amendments to soils. Afr J Env Sci Technol 3:34–41Google Scholar
  43. Yuan J-H, Xu R-K (2011) The amelioration effects of low temperature biochar generated from nine crop residues on an acidic Ultisol. Soil Use Manag 27:110–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zimmerman A (2010) Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). Env Sci Tech 44:1295–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shelby Rajkovich
    • 1
  • Akio Enders
    • 1
  • Kelly Hanley
    • 1
  • Charles Hyland
    • 1
  • Andrew R. Zimmerman
    • 2
  • Johannes Lehmann
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations