Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 235–238 | Cite as

Exploitation of glucose catabolic gene fusions to investigate in situ expression during Pseudomonas–plant interactions

  • Olivia Rice
  • Simon H. Miller
  • John P. Morrissey
  • Fergal O’Gara
Short Communication


Successful exploitation of bacterial inoculants in agriculture requires that the inoculant can colonize the crop rhizosphere and then express the gene(s) of interest. This study focuses on two glucose-metabolizing genes that are associated with the inorganic phosphate solubilization phenotype of Pseudomonas fluorescens: gcd, which encodes glucose dehydrogenase, and pqqB, which encodes a cofactor required for Gcd activity. Tn5-lux-gene fusions were created to assess the expression of these genes in situ on roots of two maize hybrids, DK315 and PR37Y15. Expression was compared to in vitro levels in the presence of root exudates and different carbon sources. Although root exudates from both varieties triggered similar levels of expression in in vitro cultures, there was a marked difference in situ, where significantly higher expression levels of both genes were observed on DK315 roots. This correlates with a higher level of rhizosphere colonization by the inoculant on this hybrid (over PR37Y15) and illustrates the importance of monitoring both colonization and expression levels in tandem. In addition to demonstrating expression of these important genes in the rhizosphere, this study also illustrates that variation can exist between cultivars or varieties and demonstrates a methodology to monitor the expression of genes of interest in the rhizosphere of the selected crop variety on which the inoculant is to be applied.


Glucose dehydrogenase Pyrroloquinoline quinone Inorganic phosphate solubilization Sustainable agriculture Microbial inoculants 


  1. Dakora FD, Phillips DA (2002) Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in low-nutrient environments. Plant Soil 245(1):35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Werra P, Pechy-Tarr M, Keel C, Maurhofer M (2009) Role of gluconic acid production in the regulation of biocontrol traits of Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(12):4162–4174. doi:10.1128/aem.00295-09 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gamalero E, Lingua G, Capri FG, Fusconi A, Berta G, Lemanceau P (2004) Colonization pattern of primary tomato roots by Pseudomonas fluorescens A6RI characterized by dilution plating, flow cytometry, fluorescence, confocal and scanning electron microscopy. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 48(1):79–87. doi:10.1016/j.femsec.2003.12.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gyaneshwar P, Kumar GN, Parekh LJ, Poole PS (2002) Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant Soil 245(1):83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johri JK, Surange S, Nautiyal CS (1999) Occurrence of salt, pH, and temperature-tolerant, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in alkaline soils. Curr Microbiol 39(2):89–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaur R, Macleod J, Foley W, Nayudu M (2006) Gluconic acid: an antifungal agent produced by Pseudomonas species in biological control of take-all. Phytochemistry 67(6):595–604. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.12.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lugtenberg BJJ, Kravchenko LV, Simons M (1999) Tomato seed and root exudate sugars: composition, utilization by Pseudomonas biocontrol strains and role in rhizosphere colonization. Environ Microbiol 1(5):439–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Magnusson OT, Toyama H, Saeki M, Rojas A, Reed JC, Liddington RC, Klinman JP, Schwarzenbacher R (2004) Quinone biogenesis: structure and mechanism of PqqC, the final catalyst in the production of pyrroloquinoline quinone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(21):7913–7918. doi:10.1073/pnas.0402640101 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miller SH, Browne P, Prigent-Combaret C, Combes-Meynet E, Morrissey JP, O'Gara F (2010) Biochemical and genomic comparison of inorganic phosphate solubilization in Pseudomonas species. Environ Microbiol Rep 2(3):403–411. doi:10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00105.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pinton R, Varanini Z, Nannipieri P (2001) The rhizosphere: biochemistry and organic substances at the soil-plant interface. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Rodriguez H, Fraga R (1999) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv 17(4–5):319–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rodríguez H, Fraga R, Gonzalez T, Bashan Y (2007) Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential applications for improving plant growth-promoting bacteria. Paper presented at the First International Meeting on Microbial Phosphate SolubilizationGoogle Scholar
  13. Truernit E (2001) Plant physiology: the importance of sucrose transporters. Curr Biol 11(5):R169–R171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD (1995) Root exudate-induced promoter activity in Pseudomonas fluorescens mutants in the wheat rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 61(3):890–898PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Velterop JS, Sellink E, Meulenberg JJM, David S, Bulder I, Postma PW (1995) Synthesis of pyrrolquinoline quinone in vivo and in vitro and detection of an intermediate in the biosynthetic pathway. J Bacteriol 177(17):5088–5098PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Walker TS, Bais HP, Grotewold E, Vivanco JM (2003) Root exudation and rhizosphere biology. Plant Physiol 132(1):44–51. doi:10.1104/pp.102.019661 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivia Rice
    • 1
  • Simon H. Miller
    • 1
  • John P. Morrissey
    • 1
  • Fergal O’Gara
    • 1
  1. 1.BIOMERIT Research Centre, Microbiology DepartmentUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations