Forest humus forms as potential indicators of soil carbon storage in Mediterranean environments
- 348 Downloads
The aim of this work was to investigate the potential of forest humus forms as indicators of soil C storage. To this purpose, Mediterranean forest soils in Southern and Central Italy were examined. Sites differed for elevation, climate, parent material and vegetation conditions, while summer drought was the common ecological factor. A morpho-functional criterion, based on holorganic layers thickness and A horizon properties, was used to classify humus forms, which ranged from Dysmoder to Eumull. Such variability allowed understanding of factors influencing organic matter storage. The relations between carbon stock and humus form were investigated for the topsoil layer (0–20 cm), which was supposed to contain the soil C pools most sensitive to climate change. We found that humus forms can be grouped in statistically different populations, with respect to topsoil C stocks. The use of A horizon structure was the main diagnostic criterion and represented the most effective approach to humus classification in Mediterranean conditions. It appears that humus forms have a clear potential as indicators of organic carbon status in Mediterranean forest soils.
KeywordsHumus forms Carbon sequestration Mediterranean forests Stabilization Carbon pools
Data were supplied by the Italian Forest Service (CONECOFOR Office) and were gathered within the Pilot Project BioSoil, co-funded by the European Commission, following Regulation (EC) No. 2152/2003 concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interaction in the community (Forest Focus).
- FAO (2006) Guidelines for soil description. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 97Google Scholar
- Green RN, Trowbridge RL, Klinka K (1993) Towards a taxonomic classification of humus forms. For Sci 39:1–49Google Scholar
- IUSS, ISRIC, FAO (2006) World reference base for soil resources—a framework for international classification, correlation and communication. World Soil Resources Report 103, FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
- Jabiol B, Brethes A, Ponge JF, Toutain F, Brun JJ (2007) L’humus sous toutes ses formes, 2e éd. AgroParisTech-ENGREF, NancyGoogle Scholar
- Kleber M, Mikutta R, Torn MS, Jahn R (2005) Poorly crystalline mineral phases protect organic matter in acid subsoil horizons. Eur J Soil Sci 56:717–725Google Scholar
- Marschner B, Brodowski S, Dreves A, Gleixner G, Gude A, Grootes PM, Hamer U, Heim A, Jandl G, Rong J, Kaiser K, Kalbitz K, Kramer C, Leinweber P, Rethemeyer J, Schaeffer A, Schmidt MWI, Schwark L, Wiesenberg LB (2008) How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organic matter in soils? J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Page G (1968) Some effects of conifer crops on soil properties. Commonw For Rev 47:52–62Google Scholar
- Page G (1974) Effects of forest cover on the properties of some Newfoundland forest soils. CAN Forestry Service, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- Ponge JF (2009) Effects of amendments on biological performance of forest soils—gaining a better understanding of the meso- and macrofauna in soil development. Rev For Fr 61:217–222Google Scholar
- UN/ECE ICP Forests (2006) Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. 2006 edition. Manual part IIIa on sampling and analysis of soils. Programme co-ordinating centre. http://www.icp-forests.org/pdf/Chapt_3a_2006(1).pdf.
- Zanella A, Jabiol B, Ponge JF, Sartori G, De Waal R, Van Delft B, Graefe U, Cools N, Katzensteiner K, Hager H, English M, Brethes A (2009) Toward a European humus forms reference base. Studi Trent Sci Nat 85:145–151Google Scholar