Advertisement

Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 585–594 | Cite as

Enhanced establishment and growth of giant cardon cactus in an eroded field in the Sonoran Desert using native legume trees as nurse plants aided by plant growth-promoting microorganisms and compost

  • Yoav Bashan
  • Bernardo Salazar
  • Ma. Esther Puente
  • Macario Bacilio
  • Robert Linderman
Original Paper

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility of long-term desert reforestation technology of mixed vegetation, cardon cactus (Pachycereus pringlei) seedlings from indoor and outdoor nurseries were planted in the field adjacent to one seedling of potential legume nurse trees: mesquite amargo (Prosopis articulata), yellow palo verde (Parkinsonia microphylla), and blue palo verde (Parkinsonia florida). Some of the planting holes were also supplemented with common dairy compost. Additionally, the combinations of legume tree–cactus were inoculated with either a consortium of desert arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB; the diazotroph Azospirillum brasilense Cd, and the phosphate solubilizer Paenibacillus sp.), or a mixture of all. The field experiments were evaluated periodically during 30 months for survival and growth. Cardons reared in an outdoor screen house survived better in the field than those reared in a controlled growth chamber and hardened later outdoors. Association with any legume nurse tree increased survival and enhanced growth of untreated cardons. For cardons growing alone, application of either compost, AM fungi, and all the treatments combined increased survival. For these plants, no treatment affected plant growth during the first 3 months after transplanting. Later, all treatments, except for AM fungi, enhanced plant growth. However, only 2 years after transplanting the enhanced growth effect of AM fungi was also significant. In the presence of the legume nurse trees, transient positive effects on cardon growth were recorded. General evaluation after 30 months of cultivation showed that the treatments positively affected cardon growth when growing alone or in combination only with mesquite amargo but not with the other two legume trees. This study proposes that young legume trees have the capacity to enhance survival and growth of cardon cactus, depending on the legume cactus combination. Additional treatments such as compost or PGPB can either amplify the effect or else attenuate it.

Keywords

Azospirillum Cardon cactus Compost Desert Mesquite Mycorrhizae Nurse plants Pachycereus Palo verde Parkinsonia Plant growth-promoting bacteria PGPB PGPR Prosopis Reforestation Soil erosion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Claudia Rojas, Manuel Moreno, and Luis Leyva for technical assistance in establishing the initial stages of the field studies and Rocio Villalpando, Juan-Pablo Hernandez, Elsa Samarano, and Diana Arizmendi for taking plant measurements and for their help in hand irrigation of the field experiments for 2 years. We thank Jose-Luis Leon de la Luz for botanical advice and Luz de-Bashan for organizing the manuscript and assisting in organization of parts of the field work. This study was mainly supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia of Mexico (CONACYT, contract #50052-Z) and partly funded by The Bashan Foundation, USA. Yoav Bashan participated in this study in memory of the late Avner Bashan of Israel.

References

  1. Arriaga L, Maya Y, Diaz S, Cancino J (1993) Association between cacti and nurse perennials in a heterogeneous tropical dry forest in northwestern Mexico. J Veg Sci 4:349–356. doi: 10.2307/3235593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacilio M, Hernandez JP, Bashan Y (2006) Restoration of giant cardon cacti in barren desert soil amended with common compost and inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense. Biol Fertil Soils 43:112–119. doi: 10.1007/s00374-006-0072-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee MJ, Gerhart VJ, Glenn EP (2006) Native plant regeneration on abandoned desert farmland: effects of irrigation, soil preparation and amendments on seedling establishment. Restor Ecol 14:339–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00142.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bashan Y (1999) Interactions of Azospirillum spp. in soils: a review. Biol Fertil Soils 29:246–256. doi: 10.1007/s003740050549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bashan Y, Puente ME, Rodriguez-Mendoza MN, Toledo G, Holguin G, Ferrera-Cerrato R, Pedrin S (1995) Survival of Azospirillum brasilense in the bulk soil and rhizosphere of 23 soil types. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1938–1945PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bashan Y, Rojas A, Puente ME (1999) Improved establishment and development of three cacti species inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense transplanted into disturbed urban desert soil. Can J Microbiol 45:441–451. doi: 10.1139/cjm-45-6-441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bashan Y, Davis EA, Carrillo-Garcia A, Linderman RG (2000a) Assessment of VA mycorrhizal inoculum potential in relation to the establishment of cactus seedlings under mesquite nurse-trees in the Sonoran Desert. Appl Soil Ecol 14:165–176. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00050-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bashan Y, Gonzalez LE, Toledo G, Leon de La Luz JL, Bethlenfalvay GJ, Troyo E, Rojas A, Holguin G, Puente ME, Lebsky VK, Vazquez P, Castellanos T, Glazier E (2000b) A proposal for conservation of exemplary stands of the giant cardon cactus (Pachycereus pringlei [S. Wats Britt. & Ross]) in Baja California Sur, Mexico. Nat Areas J 20:197–200Google Scholar
  9. Bashan Y, Hernandez JP, Leyva LA, Bacilio M (2002a) Alginate microbeads as inoculant carrier for plant growth-promoting bacteria. Biol Fertil Soils 35:359–368. doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0481-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bashan Y, Li CY, Lebsky VK, Moreno M, de-Bashan LE (2002b) Primary colonization of volcanic rocks by plants in arid Baja California, Mexico. Plant Biol 4:392–402. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bashan Y, Holguin G, de-Bashan LE (2004) Azospirillum–plant relationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances (1997–2003). Can J Microbiol 50:521–577. doi: 10.1139/w04-035 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bean TM, Smith SE, Karpiscak MM (2004) Intensive revegetation in Arizona’s hot desert. The advantages of container stock. Native Plants J 5:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brundrett M, Melville L, Peterson L (eds) (1994) Practical methods in mycorrhiza research. Mycologue, SidneyGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrillo-Garcia A, Leon de la Luz JL, Bashan Y, Bethlenfalvay GJ (1999) Nurse plants, mycorrhizae, and plant establishment in a disturbed area of the Sonoran Desert. Restor Ecol 7:321–335. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72027.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrillo-Garcia A, Bashan Y, Bethlenfalvay GJ (2000a) Resource-island soils and the survival of the giant cactus, cardon, of Baja California Sur. Plant Soil 218:207–214. doi: 10.1023/A:1014953028163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrillo-Gracia A, Bashan Y, Diaz-Rivera E, Bethlenfalvay GJ (2000b) Effects of resource - island soils, competition, and inoculation with Azospirillum on survival and growth of Pachycereus pringlei, the giant cactus of the Sonoran Desert. Restor Ecol 8:65–73. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80009.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drezner TD (2006) The regeneration of a protected Sonoran Desert cactus since 1800 A.D. over 50, 000 km2 of its range. Plant Ecol 183:171–176. doi: 10.1007/s11258-005-9015-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. García-Carreño FL (1993) Peroxidase activity in the xerophytic “Cardón” (Pachycereus pringlei), a cactaceae of the Sonoran Desert of Mexico. J Plant Physiol 142:274–280Google Scholar
  19. Garner W, Steinberger Y (1989) A proposed mechanism for the formation of ‘Fertile Islands’ in the desert ecosystem. J Arid Environ 16:257–262Google Scholar
  20. Grover HD, Musick HB (1990) Mexico, U.S.A.: an analysis of desertification processes in the American southwest. Clim Change 17:305–330. doi: 10.1007/BF00138373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halvorson JJ, Bolton H Jr, Smith JL, Rossi RE (1994) Geostatistical analysis of resource islands under Artemisia tridentata in the shrub-steppe. Great Basin Nat 54:313–328Google Scholar
  22. Leyva LA, Bashan Y (2008) Activity of two catabolic enzymes of the phosphogluconate pathway in mesquite roots inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense Cd. Plant Physiol Biochem 46:898–904. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.05.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marsh BA (1971) Measurement of length in random arrangements of lines. J Appl Ecol 8:265–267. doi: 10.2307/2402144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neilsen GH, Hogue EJ, Neilsen D, Zebarth BJ (1998) Evaluation of organic wastes as soil amendments for cultivation of carrot and chard on irrigated sandy soils. Can J Soil Sci 78:217–225Google Scholar
  25. Nobel PS (1988) Environmental biology of agaves and cacti. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Nobel PS (1996) Ecophysiology of roots of desert plants, with special emphasis on agaves and cacti. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots, the hidden half, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 823–844Google Scholar
  27. Puente ME, Bashan Y (1993) Effect of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense strains on the germination and seedlings growth of the giant columnar Cardon cactus (Pachycereus pringlei). Symbiosis 15:49–60Google Scholar
  28. Puente ME, Bashan Y, Li CY, Lebsky VK (2004a) Microbial populations and activities in the rhizoplane of rock-weathering desert plants. I. Root colonization and weathering of igneous rocks. Plant Biol 6:629–642. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-821100 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Puente ME, Li C, Bashan Y (2004b) Microbial populations and activities in the rhizoplane of rock-weathering desert plants. II. Growth promotion of cactus seedlings. Plant Biol 6:643–650. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-821101 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rincón E, Huante P, Ramírez Y (1993) Influence of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae on biomass production by the cactus Pachycereus pecten-aboriginum. Mycorrhiza 3:79–81. doi: 10.1007/BF00210697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rose SL (1981) Vesicular–arbuscular endomycorrhizal associations of some desert plants of Baja California. Can J Bot 59:1056–1060. doi: 10.1139/b81-144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roundy BA, Heydari H, Watson C, Smith SE, Munda B, Pater M (2001) Summer establishment of Sonoran Desert species for revegetation of abandoned farmland using line source sprinkler irrigation. Arid Land Res Manag 15:23–39. doi: 10.1080/153249801300000798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scott K (2006) Effect of heat on the dormancy and viability of Parkinsonia seeds: implications for management. Ecol Manag Restor 7:153–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2006.280_6.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stehouwer RC, Macneal K (2003) Use of yard trimmings compost for restoration of saline soil incineration ash. Compost Sci Util 11:51–60Google Scholar
  35. Stutz JC, Copeman R, Martin CA, Morton JB (2000) Patterns of species composition and distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in arid regions of southwestern North America and Namibia, Africa. Can J Bot 78:237–245. doi: 10.1139/cjb-78-2-237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Titus JH, Aniskoff LB, Griffith J, Garrett L, Glatt B (2003) Depth distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizae associated with mesquite. Madroño 50:28–33Google Scholar
  37. Valiente-Banuet A, Ezcurra E (1991) Shade as a cause of the association between the cactus Neobuxbaumia tetetzo and the nurse plant Mimosa luisana in the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. J Ecol 79:961–971. doi: 10.2307/2261091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vierheilig H, Coughlan A, Wyss U, Piché Y (1998) Ink and vinegar, a simple staining technique for arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:5004–5007PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoav Bashan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bernardo Salazar
    • 1
  • Ma. Esther Puente
    • 1
  • Macario Bacilio
    • 1
  • Robert Linderman
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Environmental Microbiology GroupNorthwestern Center for Biological Research (CIBNOR)La PazMexico
  2. 2.Department of Soil, Water and Environmental ScienceThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.USDA-Agricultural Research ServiceCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.Plant Health, LLCCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations